HAMMER-ANABOLICS

I'm in the mid second week running hammers dbol at 50mg ed and it's definitely underdosed. I just bumped it up to 75mg today.
I put them around 15mg a tab. Not worth the money. Dbol is so abundant, there is no excuse for under dosed tabs. And Hammer's tabs fall apart if you breath on them, very poor quality.

U
 
I put them around 15mg a tab. Not worth the money. Dbol is so abundant, there is no excuse for under dosed tabs. And Hammer's tabs fall apart if you breath on them, very poor quality.

U
You think his anadrol is underdosed too? I keep asking if anyone has taken his adrol but no one has answered lol
 
You sound like you don't mind a source with over priced shit gear. The dbol and Tren are shit, the lab is brand new and you have nothing testing purity. That is all the proof I need. Shill much?
 
You sound like you don't mind a source with over priced shit gear. The dbol and Tren are shit, the lab is brand new and you have nothing testing purity. That is all the proof I need. Shill much?
Chill man..I'm not defending shit. I was just curious on the source. Stay away, got it. Geez
 
You sound like you don't mind a source with over priced shit gear. The dbol and Tren are shit, the lab is brand new and you have nothing testing purity. That is all the proof I need. Shill much?

I would hardly call that shilling. It's actually true. His test number came back better than most UGLs. I'll be the first to say I ran his tren and it was no Bueno. But he made it right with me and I think he's catching a lot of heat here which kind of keeps him away.. Which whatever, I could give a shit less (as I'm sure nobody else gives half a fuck either). Im only saying so far there has only been posted proof that shows his shit to be good, not bad. Even with me running his tren, I don't have bloods to prove it, but I it did jack shit for me.
 
He offered me more tren, which I did not want.... At all. Sent me npp instead. Which (again, speculation..no bloodwork proof) in my opinion has been fucking great.

This is all hearsay. I want to make it clear in not vouching for him. This is my personal experience.
 
No not yet shilling, but it was heading that way. You fucking new guys and these new labs. Like a fly to shit. You try to warn dudes and they argue. One product had proven to be decent by ugl standards. So let's defend this guy huh.
I'm not defending him. I could give half a shit. But people are hell bent on destroying him. I'm being openly objective and stating the truth. I could care less if the motherfucker dropped dead
 
I'm not defending him. I could give half a shit. But people are hell bent on destroying him. I'm being openly objective and stating the truth. I could care less if the motherfucker dropped dead

Right on. Opinions and point of views are most welcome here. Stay up.
 
Var is winny, but the test is good. Tren is garbage, but the test is good. Adrol is questionable, but the test is good. Fucking one hit wonder, right there. And it's the same straight from brokenhammer on other boards - he won't admit his other gear is shit, but his test is good. Why in the FUCK do people join these boards to ask questions if they only want to believe what their mind has already been molded into believing? But, hey, he posts tits and ass, so all the 12 year olds who can't master the complexities of google searches on fake tits drop by, and spend daddy's money on shit gear. Cool, I guess! The grownups who defend him on the other hand, I don't get it.

But the test is good... Keep repeating that in your head and it might make the world right in your mind. Tunnel vision is the word to use here.
 
Well by your logic... His npp is good too right? Because I'm using it and I said it is....

I think people are getting confused. Nobody is defending hammer. Literally, I haven't seen anyone defend him. When people say his test is good, doesn't mean they are defending him. They are stating something that is true (for the moment anyway).This community is held to a higher standard because of the members. Questioning everything is great. I'm all for that. I love this place for that. Looking at a UGL and saying "this guys shit is good" will most likely never happen. Too broad of a statement.Yes, his test has been proven good, his var has been proven winny. I haven't seen any other tests? Have you ? I'm not saying jump on the train. I'm just saying speak objectively as to what is proven rather than opinionated. I myself have ran shit from him that in my opinion is good, and horrible. I'm not gunna write the guy off though, I just know what not to get from him that has been proven by the members here to be either good or shitty. Labeling a source good or bad is just too black and white when they have some stuff that is proven good.
 
You started off fine, but went downhill fast. If a source can only make 1, maybe 2 proven products, but other products that are fake, under dosed, or mislabled, where exactly DO you draw that line of labeling good versus bad?
 
You started off fine, but went downhill fast. If a source can only make 1, maybe 2 proven products, but other products that are fake, under dosed, or mislabled, where exactly DO you draw that line of labeling good versus bad?
Thanks ..?....I guess?

I'm just saying bro. The guys got some good shit and some bad shit. when he was called out on it, he fixed it. I think he's a little bitch for running away from these forums in particular but individually, everyone that I know who hit him up about it he sent new shit to. Bad batches happen dude. Seen it a million times. If a source is willing to admit it and fix it, that's okay.

Fuck this bro. It sounds like I'm defending him now.. I'm just trying to get a point across which is clearly not happening and I'm not going to risk my reputation here trying to change that so fuck it. Kill hammer.
 
Back
Top