The problem and I do not say it strategically (for neurotic children, welcome to the real reality of normal people) is that steroids have a psychological idiosyncrasy and that's what I put on the table explicitly. Some interpret it as a classist issue (because they are basically superficial people and very selfish), others interpret it as an attempt on their homeland. All that, both positions are a mistake. And that is evident in the writings of Bill Roberts, who is a similar guy to you or me and who knows very well this emotional cognitive aspect of the use of steroids. That he likes to use hcg from the fourth week of the cycle. Now again, as with the subject of estrogen's primacy and the elusive responses of bill roberts to it (basically tamoxifen according to bill has a characteristic such that it is well received in the body after the use of steroids because we enter a pro estrogen mode that only exists in women, then the evasive began, conciliator posting and even bbc3 said some interesting things) the interesting topic of hcg shows once again another interesting psychological aspect NOT recognized (I guess this is the "reason" to personal attacks towards my posts), psychological aspects as I say have to do with a search for emotional well-being that is politically and morally wrong as I interpret of the confessions of some, because basically that emotional well-being sometimes does not save relation with reproduction. And indeed AUTOPOIESIS explains that the existence of a living system is not related to reproduction as a way to perpetuate its existence in itself.It's OK no problem.Certainly we have some that go beyond autopoiesis and we have legitimate psychological interests. I am not here to moralize anyone with my sermon. But Epistemology fortunately gives us lights necessary to understand the paradoxes of such an exciting subject as this.
Cheers guys