I would like to know what those of you who support trump will do when he loses the election?

[NorthMich]

Look. Biden is simply better than the asshole who incites riots, panders to the wealthy, and grabs women by the pussy.

I’m not having a Biden party. I’m having a trump is a chump and fucking gone party

 

[BodyMechanic]

You’re a simple formula. Obviously. And your simple message resonates with the simple minded.

Must have hit home with you. Simple and never more true.

You probably have more affinity to large complex convoluted solutions we need to read after they're passed I'm sure.

 

[Skard]

Accusing others, especially your opposition, of what you are guilty of is a major tactic recommended to communists by Saul Alinsky in his book 'Rules for Radicals, which many politicians including Hillary Clinton have cited as a huge influence on their philosophies.

In fact, Clinton's college thesis was about Alinsky.
Incidentally, Ol' Saul dedicated his book to Lucifer.
--Tells a whole lot about the twisted brains of these freaks.

 

[BigBaldBeardGuy]

Look. Biden is simply better than the asshole who incites riots, panders to the wealthy, and grabs women by the pussy.

I’m not having a Biden party. I’m having a trump is a chump and fucking gone party

That makes you a negative person. Just only see the bad in people. You should see the difference when you start focusing on the positives instead.

 

[Skard]

Las Vegas will not pay off on any presidential election bets until March 5th.
Just saying.....
If Biden is locked in with no chance of anything changing, why would they not pay off on bets?

 

[Test_Subject]

Las Vegas will not pay off on any presidential election bets until March 5th.
Just saying.....
If Biden is locked in with no chance of anything changing, why would they not pay off on bets?

If you plan on holding your breath and waiting for the election to be overturned, you're going to have a bad time.

Also, betting on elections is illegal in the US. "Las Vegas" isn't paying out because no legal sportsbook in Vegas would take action on the election in the first place... Find me one Vegas-based book that took election bets, because the gaming commission would love to have a chat with them and take their license if they did.

 

[Skard]

If you plan on holding your breath and waiting for the election to be overturned, you're going to have a bad time.

Also, betting on elections is illegal in the US. "Las Vegas" isn't paying out because no legal sportsbook in Vegas would take action on the election in the first place... Find me one Vegas-based book that took election bets, because the gaming commission would love to have a chat with them and take their license if they did.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimros...no-presidential-payouts/?sh=1a3d22324cae[/URL

Coke and heroin are illegal in the USA, too. That's why there aren't any drugs in this country.

 

[Test_Subject]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimros...no-presidential-payouts/?sh=1a3d22324cae[/URL

Three things that I noticed about that link:

1) The article is from November 30th, which you might note was before the inauguration.

2) Betting on elections in the US is, in fact, illegal and that article is about overseas sportsbooks. It has nothing to do with Vegas. VegasElectionOdds.com is a betting odds aggregator, not an actual sportsbook.

3) It doesn't say anything about witholding payouts until March. A simple CTRL + F and entering "March" confirms 0 results.

This conversation has been a great example of why teaching media literacy in schools is so important.

 

[BodyMechanic]

This is what we have in the white house now:

News

The latest national and international news stories that will inform you, make you laugh and make you think.

www.ladbible.com

As bad as you think Trump may have been, Biden is in a league all by himself. Total buffoon.

 

[Skard]

Three things that I noticed about that link:

1) The article is from November 30th, which you might note was before the inauguration.

2) Betting on elections in the US is, in fact, illegal and that article is about overseas sportsbooks. It has nothing to do with Vegas. VegasElectionOdds.com is a betting odds aggregator, not an actual sportsbook.

3) It doesn't say anything about witholding payouts until March. A simple CTRL + F and entering "March" confirms 0 results.

This conversation has been a great example of why teaching media literacy in schools is so important.

Bets not being paid out until the 5th was something I heard on the radio, hence the question. Upon further investigation it does appear to be false info, so that clears up my question.

Unfortunately there is no time to teach much in schools after communist ideology, climate change, and gender mutation.

I'm not holding my breath for anything, but as for the election, that was already overturned.

 

[Big_paul]

Read my post again big guy. Did I mention Trump at all? Nope. Stop painting us out to be brainwashed followers of some demagogue. It isn’t that way at all.

Win or lose, there were irregularities (and I didn’t even claim they would be enough to reverse the election) that need to be looked into before many Americans feel like there vote matters again. It’s not whining or being a sore loser, it’s cleaning up politics that have probably been run like this for decades. The voting laws need to be clear across the board.

Pelosi was bitching during the summer that armed forces shouldn’t receive mail in ballots if they are serving in a foreign country and at the same time was advocating for mail in ballots here due to covid. That’s not how officials in our country should be operating.

Just keeping things real BBBG. I read your post from start to finish. As far as your veiw of the 2020 election you are propagating some what should be obvious inaccuracies.

The entire U.S judicial system didn't conspire against Donald J Trump. They just found that the cases brought before dozens of judges have no merit.

Im with you on the voting laws. Im for a true democracy where the candidate with the most votes wins, and that voting rights are respected. Seems to me that would be a good start. The GOP would no longer be a factor in national elections though so I don't see that happening in the near future. Anything will be possible when Trump destroys the Republican party though.

 

[Big_paul]

So strange that you can call him a dictator when his policies minimized the government's involvement in most things domestic. And now the man you voted for is putting his foot on the throat of hard working Americans. With the stroke of a pen he made many lives worse already and he isn't doing anything to handle the pandemic that trump wasn't already doing, aside from requiring masks on federal property, a rule which he himself has already broken. But you can sit there with a straight face and call trump a dictator?

I called him a wannabe. As do the majority of Americans and the rest of the free world.

As for Biden I think it woud be fair to give him some time. It's a little too soon to say. He has been President for a week. As far as the pandemic, it's a shit sandwich. I hope he is able to improve the distribution of the vaccines and convince enough people of their safty. The economy rests on his ability to do that. With many conservative that is going to be an uphill battle in that many deny that there is a pandemic. I'm a conservative but my education is in health science.

 

[Skard]

Watch this nineteen second video of Biden and decide for yourself if you think this guy will be around for long.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQ8wICtwDBk

 

[BodyMechanic]

Watch this nineteen second video of Biden and decide for yourself if you think this guy will be around for long.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQ8wICtwDBk

He's already not there. He just signs em baby. He has no fucking clue what's going on. I said before he wouldn't last 2 years, may be one too many. Scary thing is the Dem Woodworms are typing up the exec orders.

 

[Villain]

Hey @Villian whats up? I asked a simple question. I wanted to know how other members felt about what would happen when trump lost the election, lied to his followers about the election results to them and their response. It unfolded just like I had suspected it would. He lost. He fabricated a conspiracy theory about a stolen election, and the rest will go down in history.

At what point did I say there would be mass riots? I admit, other than the violent takeover of the capital for the first time in the history of the nation, other than the sack by the British in 1814, it was a peaceful transfer of power.

Glad to see you are well brother. Honest, my name here is Big_paul and I have never went by any other in the 20+ years that I have been posting on this board.

People can sure get ugly when it comes to politics right. It's in the past for me now. Well I have to tend to the garden. Good to see you are still around. Take care.

I tried to tag you and couldn’t for some reason, not meaning to disrespect you when I said “big Paul or whatever his name is.” I know you’ve been around for a while on Meso.

I’d have to go back and re-read but your original post seemed to imply Trump supporters would be the ones looting and rioting, when that is clear the way of the BLM/Antifa and left crowd, not the right. That being said, there was very little, as you noticed and mentioned. We pretty much go on about our lives without the name calling or childish “not my president” BS.

Good to see you around as well brother.

 

[Millard]

But there definitely WERE irregularities. The majority of the cases were dismissed for lack of standing or other legal process. There’s not exactly a lot of precedent cases here. The evidence was never afforded an opportunity to be presented.

Now was it significant enough to affect the election? I guess we’ll never know. The Mainstream Media use to be about investigative journalism. What story would be bigger than this? Yet they aren’t even touching it. They are eager to say “Trump LIED” but they won’t dig deeper to prove it.

The Mainstream Media extensively covered the legal battle. That WAS the story. The coverage was everywhere. Undoubtedly, mainstream coverage was moreso than conservative-leaning media.

The burden to prove substantial election fraud occurred rested with the "election defense" court challenges. The court cases failed miserably on standing (could not prove their party was harmed) and failed on merit (could not provide significant evidence of election fraud).

Clearly, the Mainstream Media enjoyed non-stop coverage. The Conservative Media, not so much and understandably so.

What was it BBBG almost 60 to 1 got the future of democracy in America wrong. All those judges, some of which Trump appointed, took it upon themselves to toss trumps lawyers and his gripes out of court?

There was a case in Wisconsin that a trump appointed judge let the case be heard. He listened to them and afterwards he voted trumps lawyers down with prejudice, which means he was saying they could not bring the case back to the courts because it was a waste of the courts time. Trump appointed judge. And he actually blasted them with quite a few harsh words. So to say no cases were heard is not entirely accurate. Some were and were resoundly thrown out.

 

[Millard]

Jeff Besos opposes mailing ballots, can't imagine why?

I know this was a rhetorical question.

But if anyone actually read the court documents, they may find it surprising that Amazon actually defended mail-in ballots in political elections in their argument. Amazon attorneys said that such mail-in balloting "promote security and voter turnout":



It's not what I expected. Of course, I think Amazon really just wants to stop or at least delay workers from unionizing for as long as possible. (That's NOT in the court documents lol)

 

[BodyMechanic]

I know this was a rhetorical question.

But if anyone actually read the court documents, they may find it surprising that Amazon actually defended mail-in ballots in political elections in their argument. Amazon attorneys said that such mail-in balloting "promote security and voter turnout":

View attachment 141604

It's not what I expected. Of course, I think Amazon really just wants to stop or at least delay workers from unionizing for as long as possible. (That's NOT in the court documents lol)

Stating it in the court docs, I think, is a way of deflecting criticism, ultimately you're right, their goal is to thwart the unionization of their employees.

It's funny, for years even Democrats publicly stated that mail ballots would be more susceptible to fraud. Total 180 on that. Anyway beat horse [emoji206] already. Now just fingers crossed and pray we don't fall totally into a hole we can't crawl out of.

 

[Human_backhoe]

Stating it in the court docs, I think, is a way of deflecting criticism, ultimately you're right, their goal is to thwart the unionization of their employees.

It's funny, for years even Democrats publicly stated that mail ballots would be more susceptible to fraud. Total 180 on that. Anyway beat horse [emoji206] already. Now just fingers crossed and pray we don't fall totally into a hole we can't crawl out of.

Pissed off enough to remove Nancy but not Aoc hahah?

 

[BodyMechanic]

Pissed off enough to remove Nancy but not Aoc hahah?

LoL

I love AOC. I forgive anything from that woman. Love overcomes all haha