Ideal concentrations?

Lol, where to start? How would you know it has pip if you never seen that concentration before? And who says it has pip? Obviously if you heard someone say that then you heard about the 300mg blend that you said never existed. So far you're making yourself look stupid kid. You just showed all of us you have zero knowledge about AAS and don't know shit. But,
3668202.jpg

okay...well there's an easy way to settle this. you will have no problem doing this all you have to do is post three things.

-an active listing for a 300mg rip blend, which I'm sure exists
-a recipe for the blend
-at least one user review

that's it! you got this.
 
Unless you prefer the "opinions" of others, evidence based Pharmacokinetic studied of this nature can generally be located on the net with a little effort since they are FDA prerequisite for all approved drugs.

(Yet by no means does this imply all such info is available to the general public, since some meds exhibit "specialized" as in proprietary kinetics)

Nonetheless providing the ester comparisons are identical extrapolations to other "unapproved", as in clandestine
AAS would seem reasonable IMO.

Of course the latter assumes one has purchased the real McCoy in the absence of excipients that alter depot absorption, etc.

Jim

I applaud you for trying to seem intelligent but most of that did not make sense and is riddled with typos. Please resubmit a revised version of this post and please provide these "evidence-based pharmacokinetic studies" that are so easy to retrieve. Thank you.
 
I applaud you for trying to seem intelligent but most of that did not make sense and is riddled with typos. Please resubmit a revised version of this post and please provide these "evidence-based pharmacokinetic studies" that are so easy to retrieve. Thank you.

Hey if you can't read or understand upper level English locate another forum or find a dictionary Clown.

As evidence you can't read try reviewing @Erin post in THIS THREAD since it's one of many Pharmacokinetic
studies readily avaliable on the net, lol!

As for the "typos" this is an AAS forum
rather than some class on proper prose, punctuation or some "spelling B"
.
 
Last edited:
okay...well there's an easy way to settle this. you will have no problem doing this all you have to do is post three things.

-an active listing for a 300mg rip blend, which I'm sure exists
-a recipe for the blend
-at least one user review

that's it! you got this.

Too easy. Like i said it's common. And just recently people started calling that "rip blend". It was originally TMP - Tren/Mast/Prop.

201249652-310x310.jpg
 
Hey if you can't read or understand upper level English locate another forum or find a dictionary Clown.

As evidence you can't read try reviewing @Erin post in THIS THREAD since it's one of many Pharmacokinetic
studies readily avaliable on the net, lol!

Oh...well I entered that post into a piece grammar checker and it identified four errors...I guess the blasted thing is broken!!
 
But let us not overlook someone so gifted, continue your existing course and "correct" all of Mesos punctuation and spelling errors--- bc to date you've offered nothing more of value IMO.
 
But let us not overlook someone so gifted, continue your existing course and "correct" all of Mesos punctuation and spelling errors--- bc to date you've offered nothing more of value IMO.

Uh whatever yeah I just read that study thanks! I didn't see it initially, for whatever reason. It more or less answered my question, with an emphasis on more.
 
Too easy. Like i said it's common. And just recently people started calling that "rip blend". It was originally TMP - Tren/Mast/Prop.

201249652-310x310.jpg

It's common? LOL. It's so common you had to search for it! You are trying too hard, and it's sad. It's not even remotely common, not to mention that you are tragically navigating around the fact that it's not PIPless, not at all. Make it yourself and let me know how Pip free it is and send me some! ;) I mean you know what you're doing so it should be easy. Tell me what recipe you would use.
 
It's common? LOL. You are trying too hard, and it's sad. It's not even remotely common, not to mention that you are tragically navigating around the fact that it's not PIPless, not at all.

Trying too hard? Ha. The sad thing about it is you're trying to tell people with experience what you believe. Again, you dont know shit! You sure are making this enjoyable though.
795.gif
 
It says:
18% bb
2% ba

The long ester is the same also.
200mg Tren E
200mg Test E
200mg Mast E
600mg total

and it has no PIP?? that's cray. because that ratio is pretty standard for 100mg/ml recipes...but i'm sure you knew that! ;)

oh and pretty please what's the carrier oil?
 
Back
Top