Igf-1 lr3

[AlwaysHungry]

Hello everybody I'm thinking to start cycling igf-1 lr3 and mk677 along with my pct . So I'm a little confused not about the dosage but on the spots I'm going to pin it I read the most people pin it post workout . But I've also heard they pinned it on the muscle they trained so if I train shoulders I should pin 25mcg on one shoulder and another 25mcg to the other ? Also if I train legs the same with quads? If I train back chest etc?
Also what other benefits should I see expect from recovery ? Muscle growth on long term? And if you're going to stop aas and use it alone off cycle what kind of results do you get? Sorry for to many questions but I didn't find very much info on the internet

 

[TRT]

I don't think it has localized effects at all to be honest. Then again I think all the IGF is fake anyhow.

 

[AlwaysHungry]

Maybe a

 

[janoshik]

I don't think it has localized effects at all to be honest. Then again I think all the IGF is fake anyhow.

Nah, 4/6 igf-1 lr3 samples I had tested proved to be real, and what's surprising, perfectly dosed

however using it during PCT? why?

Just do HGH instead, imo.

 

[AlwaysHungry]

To help maintain the gains . Bro if I had the money for hgh I would ask my personal doc

 

[TRT]

Nah, 4/6 igf-1 lr3 samples I had tested proved to be real, and what's surprising, perfectly dosed

however using it during PCT? why?

Just do HGH instead, imo.

Why would you choose HGH over IGF-LR3 during PCT?

What's cost vs effectiveness in raising IGF?

 

[AlwaysHungry]

I think he's opinion is based by effectiveness of hgh

 

[janoshik]

To help maintain the gains . Bro if I had the money for hgh I would ask my personal doc

I don't believe that IGF-1 LR3 has better ratio of cost/results, but I might be wrong.

Why would you choose HGH over IGF-LR3 during PCT?

What's cost vs effectiveness in raising IGF?

See above.

My belief, based on several anecdotes and knowledge of the prices, is that IGF1 and its analogues have place mostly with people who are already up on the maximum tolerable level of HGH and seek further improvements.

I also believe, that during PCT the more stable levels, which are resulting from use of HGH would help more with maintaining. I would doubt that gaining muscle mass during PCT would be very viable, even with mk677 and IGF1, unless of course, the guy is just a newbie.

However, this is only my subjective belief.

 

[AlwaysHungry]

I say maintain on pct. and gain off cycle

 

[TRT]

Okay. Just curious.

 

[janoshik]

I say maintain on pct. and gain off cycle

Mea culpa, the point remains, though.

 

[ProfessorX]

Why would you choose HGH over IGF-LR3 during PCT?

What's cost vs effectiveness in raising IGF?

IGF1 LR3 is not going to elevate or show IGF1 elevation in a blood test

IGF1 LR3 is a completely different analog with a different molecular weight

IGF-1 (increlex) would be a synthetic protein that is "bio-identical"

IGF1 LR3 is not "bio-identical"

Example:

Injecting Synthetic Growth Hormone will elevate ones Growth Hormone Serum

Injecting IGF1 LR3 will not elevate ones IGF Serum

I agree with with Jano about using HGH

 

[Tmisatix]

I don't think it has localized effects at all to be honest. Then again I think all the IGF is fake anyhow.

I really don't trust any receptor grade IGF . The only legit IGF is really increlex, or any other pharma IGF. 4 weeks on it and you've mutated years worth of tren apparently. Almost impossible to find and the price is extremely high.

It's a shame as I'd love to try

 

[ChestRockwell]

The only legit IGF is really increlex, or any other pharma IGF.

Increlex does lack the ternary complex (ALS/IGFBP-3) so it will require more frequent injections such as brands like Iplex (which contains the binding proteins required to extend half-life, increase bioavailability in certain tissues, etc)...

 

[ProfessorX]

Increlex does lack the ternary complex (ALS/IGFBP-3) so it will require more frequent injections such as brands like Iplex (which contains the binding proteins required to extend half-life, increase bioavailability in certain tissues, etc)...

According to this:

IPlex Information from Drugs.com

It seems to be discontinued


IGF-1 LR3 doesn't seem to be used medically for human use, yet it is praised on most BBing Forums


It does seem to be gaining popularity in the Florida HRT clinics lately

Link: (compounded IGF1)

https://www.eroids.com/sites/default/files/gearpic/126408/received_1131007233665427.jpeg

Home

https://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2015/ucm454009.htm

 

[ChestRockwell]

It seems to be discontinued

That is unfortunate, however I think there may be some other brands that I've seen in some of my references because it is commonly accepted that Increlex does have some shortcomings in IGF-deficient patients (namely the need to frequently inject).

 

[Roco Bama]

There's no need for a recombinant IGF-1. HGH increases GH and IGFs level and is much cheaper. It's like wanting to take amino acids when animal protein can get the job done at a fraction of the cost.

 

[janoshik]

There's no need for a recombinant IGF-1. HGH increases GH and IGFs level and is much cheaper. It's like wanting to take amino acids when animal protein can get the job done at a fraction of the cost.

I agree with you - however, HGH can raise IGF only up to a certain point, after which IGF supplementation becomes viable in my opinion.

 

[ChestRockwell]

Furthermore, there are considerations to be made as it relates to autocrine versus endocrine IGF levels and how one may increase one without increasing the other.

If there were ways to use IGF analogs to increase autocrine IGF levels, that would be advantageous as it relates to hypertrophy potential.

 

[Dr JIM]

IGF-1 LR3 doesn't seem to be used medically for human use, yet it is praised on most BBing Forums


It does seem to be gaining popularity in the Florida HRT clinics lately

As I've mentioned previously LR-3
is almost exclusively used to enhance cell culture growth in research labs

And using the praises of those on PED forums to establish efficacy is something I would very much discourage bc these same folk are often involved in the SALES of those compounds being praised

Finally many "HRT" facilities exist thru-out the U.S. that advertise one med and end up using another.

And since LR-3 is NOT FDA approved for therapeutic human use, I very much doubt it's actually being used in HRT clinics.

Oh sure there are several "clinics" that use a number of supplements for what ails us all
stress, anxiety, malaise,, bla, bla but NOT as specific therapy for a specific medical condition.

And bc some of these "clinics" are not even staffed with a physician they tend to be very careful about the verbiage used in advertisements.

For instance they will treat the SYMPTOMS due to "low T or low IGF" but absent compliance with FDA guidelines they can't treat low T or low IGF values, with those meds specifically designed for that purpose.