International HGH price comparison

[Excel.exe]

@MyNameIsJeff thank you for the hard work

 

[readalot]

- Feedback/criticism for the new 'source risk' item is welcome.

View attachment 307818

Fantastic effort as always. You don't place probability of QSC takedown as high in the next 12 months given the volumes and packaging issues? Curious your thinking there.

Is Source Risk as you have there the risk of not getting your pack?

Props on all your effort. Thank you.

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

Fantastic effort as always. You don't place probability of QSC takedown as high in the next 12 months given the volumes and packaging issues? Curious your thinking there.

Is Source Risk as you have there the risk of not getting your pack?

Props on all your effort. Thank you.

Well, we had a recent crackdown in China, and QSC was not among the affected sources. That is despite their position as a market leader with extremely high sales volumes. This could indicate that QSC carefully selects its product offerings so as to not put themselves in the crosshairs of authorities.

Also, money talks. A market leader can afford higher kickbacks for officials than the competitors. So if a scapegoat is needed, it's gonna be one of the smaller sources.

Overall, I assess the source risk for QSC as low to very low. And yes, the 'source risk' item relates to the probability of actually receiving the items you ordered.

 

[Sampei]

- Feedback/criticism for the new 'source risk' item is welcome.

View attachment 307818

I would place SRY as high.

They have done too much shit in the last few months, lies after lies, bunk NAD and other quite bad stuff.
Plus their company has been indicted for fentanyl precursors. I mean I would stay a mile far away from them

 

[Sampei]

Well, we had a recent crackdown in China, and QSC was not among the affected sources. That is despite their position as a market leader with extremely high sales volumes. This could indicate that QSC carefully selects its product offerings so as to not put themselves in the crosshairs of authorities.

Also, money talks. A market leader can afford higher kickbacks for officials than the competitors. So if a scapegoat is needed, it's gonna be one of the smaller sources.

Overall, I assess the source risk for QSC as low to very low. And yes, the 'source risk' item relates to the probability of actually receiving the items you ordered.

I agree with you 100%.

 

[readalot]

Well, we had a recent crackdown in China, and QSC was not among the affected sources. That is despite their position as a market leader with extremely high sales volumes. This could indicate that QSC carefully selects its product offerings so as to not put themselves in the crosshairs of authorities.

Also, money talks. A market leader can afford higher kickbacks for officials than the competitors. So if a scapegoat is needed, it's gonna be one of the smaller sources.

Overall, I assess the source risk for QSC as low to very low. And yes, the 'source risk' item relates to the probability of actually receiving the items you ordered.

Thank you for taking the time to craft and share your thoughtful response.

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

Increased Sry labs 'source risk' assessment to 'Medium-high' for now.