International HGH price comparison

[Excel.exe]

@MyNameIsJeff thank you for the hard work

 

[readalot]

- Feedback/criticism for the new 'source risk' item is welcome.

View attachment 307818

Fantastic effort as always. You don't place probability of QSC takedown as high in the next 12 months given the volumes and packaging issues? Curious your thinking there.

Is Source Risk as you have there the risk of not getting your pack?

Props on all your effort. Thank you.

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

Fantastic effort as always. You don't place probability of QSC takedown as high in the next 12 months given the volumes and packaging issues? Curious your thinking there.

Is Source Risk as you have there the risk of not getting your pack?

Props on all your effort. Thank you.

Well, we had a recent crackdown in China, and QSC was not among the affected sources. That is despite their position as a market leader with extremely high sales volumes. This could indicate that QSC carefully selects its product offerings so as to not put themselves in the crosshairs of authorities.

Also, money talks. A market leader can afford higher kickbacks for officials than the competitors. So if a scapegoat is needed, it's gonna be one of the smaller sources.

Overall, I assess the source risk for QSC as low to very low. And yes, the 'source risk' item relates to the probability of actually receiving the items you ordered.

 

[Sampei]

- Feedback/criticism for the new 'source risk' item is welcome.

View attachment 307818

I would place SRY as high.

They have done too much shit in the last few months, lies after lies, bunk NAD and other quite bad stuff.
Plus their company has been indicted for fentanyl precursors. I mean I would stay a mile far away from them

 

[Sampei]

Well, we had a recent crackdown in China, and QSC was not among the affected sources. That is despite their position as a market leader with extremely high sales volumes. This could indicate that QSC carefully selects its product offerings so as to not put themselves in the crosshairs of authorities.

Also, money talks. A market leader can afford higher kickbacks for officials than the competitors. So if a scapegoat is needed, it's gonna be one of the smaller sources.

Overall, I assess the source risk for QSC as low to very low. And yes, the 'source risk' item relates to the probability of actually receiving the items you ordered.

I agree with you 100%.

 

[readalot]

Well, we had a recent crackdown in China, and QSC was not among the affected sources. That is despite their position as a market leader with extremely high sales volumes. This could indicate that QSC carefully selects its product offerings so as to not put themselves in the crosshairs of authorities.

Also, money talks. A market leader can afford higher kickbacks for officials than the competitors. So if a scapegoat is needed, it's gonna be one of the smaller sources.

Overall, I assess the source risk for QSC as low to very low. And yes, the 'source risk' item relates to the probability of actually receiving the items you ordered.

Thank you for taking the time to craft and share your thoughtful response.

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

Increased Sry labs 'source risk' assessment to 'Medium-high' for now.

 

[FUYAO]

Greetings sir,

I don't understand why FUYAO was marked as Mid-High?
We have low sales and minimum feedbacks, just one feedback was posted here in Thinksteroids forum, but we delivered all our customers who placed the orders, just because I have nothing to say in the thread with low traffic, it doesn't mean I should be labeled as a risky source. Thank you for understanding.

We also have feedbacks in Discord



We have done everything required, we have very competitive prices, testing, and we offer credit store for third party testing. Meso members didn't gave us chance and there is a lack of feedbacks.

Best regards

Homer

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

Greetings sir,

I don't understand why FUYAO was marked as Mid-High?
We have low sales and minimum feedbacks, just one feedback was posted here in Thinksteroids forum, but we delivered all our customers who placed the orders, just because I have nothing to say in the thread with low traffic, it doesn't mean I should be labeled as a risky source. Thank you for understanding.

We also have feedbacks in Discord



We have done everything required, we have very competitive prices, testing, and we offer credit store for third party testing. Meso members didn't gave us chance and there is a lack of feedbacks.

Best regards

Homer

Thanks for chiming in. The reason for the higher risk assessment was due to the 'MIA' marker, which in turn was caused by the fact that your last posting in your thread was from 3 weeks ago.

I would recommend that you bump your thread at least once a week, to let customers know that you are still in business and that you stand ready to help board members with any potential ordering issues.

In addition, you could post a link to your Discord, along with screenshots of customer feedback from there. That would serve to reassure board members about your services and increase the likelihood of them giving you a try. And that will then get the ball rolling also over here.

In any case, I will lower your risk assessment for now, given your recent activity.

 

[MyNameIsJeff]