Excel.exe
Member
@MyNameIsJeff thank you for the hard work
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fantastic effort as always. You don't place probability of QSC takedown as high in the next 12 months given the volumes and packaging issues? Curious your thinking there.
Well, we had a recent crackdown in China, and QSC was not among the affected sources. That is despite their position as a market leader with extremely high sales volumes. This could indicate that QSC carefully selects its product offerings so as to not put themselves in the crosshairs of authorities.Fantastic effort as always. You don't place probability of QSC takedown as high in the next 12 months given the volumes and packaging issues? Curious your thinking there.
Is Source Risk as you have there the risk of not getting your pack?
Props on all your effort. Thank you.
I would place SRY as high.
I agree with you 100%.Well, we had a recent crackdown in China, and QSC was not among the affected sources. That is despite their position as a market leader with extremely high sales volumes. This could indicate that QSC carefully selects its product offerings so as to not put themselves in the crosshairs of authorities.
Also, money talks. A market leader can afford higher kickbacks for officials than the competitors. So if a scapegoat is needed, it's gonna be one of the smaller sources.
Overall, I assess the source risk for QSC as low to very low. And yes, the 'source risk' item relates to the probability of actually receiving the items you ordered.
Thank you for taking the time to craft and share your thoughtful response.Well, we had a recent crackdown in China, and QSC was not among the affected sources. That is despite their position as a market leader with extremely high sales volumes. This could indicate that QSC carefully selects its product offerings so as to not put themselves in the crosshairs of authorities.
Also, money talks. A market leader can afford higher kickbacks for officials than the competitors. So if a scapegoat is needed, it's gonna be one of the smaller sources.
Overall, I assess the source risk for QSC as low to very low. And yes, the 'source risk' item relates to the probability of actually receiving the items you ordered.
Thanks for chiming in. The reason for the higher risk assessment was due to the 'MIA' marker, which in turn was caused by the fact that your last posting in your thread was from 3 weeks ago.Greetings sir,
I don't understand why FUYAO was marked as Mid-High?
We have low sales and minimum feedbacks, just one feedback was posted here in Thinksteroids forum, but we delivered all our customers who placed the orders, just because I have nothing to say in the thread with low traffic, it doesn't mean I should be labeled as a risky source. Thank you for understanding.
We also have feedbacks in Discord
We have done everything required, we have very competitive prices, testing, and we offer credit store for third party testing. Meso members didn't gave us chance and there is a lack of feedbacks.
Best regards
Homer
Thanks for this, my friend!
Top tier.who has tried QSC hgh?
is it actually any good at all compared to other sources...
I hope I have 1800iuTop tier.
that's a big statement... better than TP?Top tier.
does qsc gh vials have a vacuum?I hope I have 1800iu
I've been thru 20 kits or so and they all had a strong vacuumdoes qsc gh vials have a vacuum?