hellerhiwater
Member
Now that the enforcement action’s purpose has been made abundantly clear, and the offending member has signaled their contrition and intention to abide by the guidelines laid out—is it not appropriate to lift the restrictions to signal a good faith desire to move forward in cooperation with the stated goals?The recent enforcement action was about protecting members’ absolute freedom to report disputes, scams, disagreements, product issues, or any other negative experience with any source. Members must be welcomed and encouraged to speak openly about sources, with no source being above criticism regardless of reputation or longevity or number of supporters.
Sources are prohibited from taking actions that stifle, suppress, intimidate, or retaliate against members who report complaints. The same standard applies to all members: no one may discourage reporting, pressure complainants into silence, normalize retaliation, or attempt to shield a source from scrutiny.
This principle has always been central to MESO-Rx. We do not protect sources from criticism. We do not discourage dissatisfied customers from reporting. We do not bury complaints.
This is not complicated. It is not controversial. It is fundamental to harm reduction. We invite every member to support this principle and help maintain a culture where transparency and accountability come first.
I for one am confident these fellas have a plan for how to modify their speech in the future to retain the air of harm reduction while still adding their pedigree’s weight to the discussion.
Respectfully requested, of course.
