"Kevin's" oxandrolone - mass spec indicates that it is only 39% pure.

[xupc]

There is a big discussion on /r/steroidsourcetalk. /u/unixpo mass spec'd Kevin's oxadrolone powder, and found out that it is only 39% pure. He does not know what the other 61% is. The PDF of the mass spec will soon be available.

In my opinion this indicates that "Kevin" is not a reliable source for Anavar. This potentially affects other sources. However, further information is needed.

 

[TANGO.ECHO.KILO]

this is an issue in the "USAspetz" thread in the underground here as well. Thanks for reposting.

 

[xupc]

I mentioned @usaspetz initially at my original post. However, I edited it out as I am not sure 100% if he sells only from Kevin or sources anavar from other places.

 

[TANGO.ECHO.KILO]

It really doesn't matter because he tests NONE of it. However he did a comical job of defending Kevin's Var in the face of the MS results coming to light. Still waiting for him to resurface and address it in more detail but seems like his initial response was that he was quite satisfied with the purity as long as ppl continued to order

 

[xupc]

Lets hope that a) they will provide compensation for those that bought the powder and b) that there is dbol/tbol/winstrol or some other hormone (as people report good results) and not fucking rat poison.

 

[TANGO.ECHO.KILO]

Dbol is not what I want my girl ingesting when I purchased it under the label of var, I'm sure many guys feel the same way about their wives as well

 

[xupc]

Dbol is not what I want my girl ingesting when I purchased it under the label of var, I'm sure many guys feel the same way about their wives as well

I gave dbol as an example.

I doubt is dbol as I know two girls on it, and both have good results. I also know two guys on it and both have really good results.

I really wonder what it is.. and if it was one bad batch or not.

 

[bigpoppachump]

This is the point where the source comes on this site and gives us all an explanation that no one has ever heard of on how the purity is there and the hormone is as stated using some big complex scientific/mathematical formula. And then somebody actually believes this shit and then they go spreading this new found explanation/formula on other boards and poof! a new idiot bro-science is formed.

 

[newerest]

I dont know if im just jaded but man 39% pure anavar ? Atleast its not fucking dbol right?

Will the full pdf show what the rest of it is?

 

[littlemuscles]

N

I dont know if im just jaded but man 39% pure anavar ? Atleast its not fucking dbol right?

Will the full pdf show what the rest of it is?

Not sure but we will have the pdf soon to see the results. Also /u/unixpro did not have the var mass specd it was sent by one of the mods (/u/polarwolf). Not trying to bust your balls but figured I would say that in case people start asking Unix to do tests or some shit.

 

[belfast32]

Hello, i think there is something very dishonest going on here. I am a private source who is absolutely staying private first off. we opened up recently but got as many new customers as we could handle. so that is not why we are here. we got some mass specs done thru a trusted customer and the results were eerily similar to these.. we were trying to find a more accessible back up powder supplier for an expansion later in the year and the results were as follows.

sample a- 39% purity, test e is present at 89mg/ml

sample b- 61% test e is present at 179 mg/ml

we always send finished product in for testing, but may do powder testing in the future. I also assure you we would not buy raw powder from someone named kevin. also i have heard the poster does not have the results posted for some reason (possibly to doctor) well I'm here to prove my position.

i will send my results to any vet and they can post if they want or vouch, I'm not sure how it works here.

i will disclose my analyst, i probably use the same one as some people here, it wouldn't be hard to set up some type of verification with him that they are mine and authentic.

 

[devildog93]

Sorry man, but if you are attempting to discredit a testing facility, that may be a little harder than crapping on a source. Just the way it has to be, especially with no track record. This isn't to say that couldn't have happened, but i would like to see a second opinion or data point at least, like someone else sending in 2 samples from the same batch and getting different results.
If they botch the MS then i would burn them and let everyone know.

Alin has tried this crap on other boards and it didn't work out so well for him. He had a supposed doctor try and invalidate some bad tests done on his gear. Even on a censored board he received a rash of shit for the attempt. Just saying line your ducks up in a row for something like this.

 

[belfast32]

I'm not, I'm saying i use the same testing facility and one of the reps or one of the people we trusted with the results are using my results for their own purposes. i have proof and created my own thread asking any one from this board who uses a---s to verify that it is where. my results came from. If you got ms tests from him before i will gladly send them to you so you can see that mine are the originals and that he did the testing.

 

[devildog93]

Ok, sorry if i got confused on what you were saying. Mythotic and Lightspan are who you need to talk to i think.

 

[Dr JIM]

This is the same rationale damn near every "source" uses to re-establish credibility when being challenged by those who purchase the END PRODUCT. What am I referring to specifically, GETM was a great example! They forward either a know high grade AAS sample for MS to some "respected" testing facility or re-post the results of someone else's high end AAS product from the net and lament "see guys we sell the good stuff".

Now what does that prove? At best the source is receiving high grade raws, and thereafter stepping on that which is sold to consumers.

So cease the bullshit and find another sucker because I KNOW better.

Personally I could care less what purity or concentration "rating" you or any other source achieves from directed analysis, because that's NOT what 99% of consumers are receiving because that's NOT what is being sold, pure and simple.

The reality is, if a purchaser wants to KNOW the quality of a particular AAS product being sold, they MUST analyze the CONSUMER PRODUCT, period. Anything else is a poorly concocted ruse, on behalf of unscrupulous AAS UGL which is the overwhelming MAJORITY, IME.

Regs
jim

 

[Dr JIM]

I dont know if im just jaded but man 39% pure anavar ? Atleast its not fucking dbol right?

Will the full pdf show what the rest of it is?

Absolutely NOT!!

 

[belfast32]

This is the same rationale damn near every "source" uses to re-establish credibility when being challenged by those who purchase the END PRODUCT. What am I referring to specifically, GETM was a great example! They forward either a know high grade AAS sample for MS to some "respected" testing facility or re-post the results of someone else's high end AAS product from the net and lament "see guys we sell the good stuff".

Now what does that prove? At best the source is receiving high grade raws, and thereafter stepping on that which is sold to consumers.

So cease the bullshit and find another sucker because I KNOW better.

Personally I could care less what purity or concentration "rating" you or any other source achieves from directed analysis, because that's NOT what 99% of consumers are receiving because that's NOT what is being sold, pure and simple.

The reality is, if a purchaser wants to KNOW the quality of a particular AAS product being sold, they MUST analyze the CONSUMER PRODUCT, period. Anything else is a poorly concocted ruse, on behalf of unscrupulous AAS UGL which is the overwhelming MAJORITY, IME.

Regs
jim

This is the same rationale damn near every "source" uses to re-establish credibility when being challenged by those who purchase the END PRODUCT. What am I referring to specifically, GETM was a great example! They forward either a know high grade AAS sample for MS to some "respected" testing facility or re-post the results of someone else's high end AAS product from the net and lament "see guys we sell the good stuff".

Now what does that prove? At best the source is receiving high grade raws, and thereafter stepping on that which is sold to consumers.

So cease the bullshit and find another sucker because I KNOW better.

Personally I could care less what purity or concentration "rating" you or any other source achieves from directed analysis, because that's NOT what 99% of consumers are receiving because that's NOT what is being sold, pure and simple.

The reality is, if a purchaser wants to KNOW the quality of a particular AAS product being sold, they MUST analyze the CONSUMER PRODUCT, period. Anything else is a poorly concocted ruse, on behalf of unscrupulous AAS UGL which is the overwhelming MAJORITY, IME.

I'm not here for that, can you even read?? the results i goot back were 39% purity and 61% purity on test e samples i got from suppliers i was thinking about trying as a backup. someone i trusted stole these to pass of as their own to run a reverse scam. i paid for the tests noone should use them but me. I'm not here sourcing just tellin yiu guys that these results may not be accurate.
Regs
jim

 

[belfast32]

Absolutely NOT!!

Oh i must apologize, where are my manners. we didn't do proper introductions.

I'm so pleased to meet you "DR. Jim" my name is "STARSHIP CAPTAIN BILLY" I'm very pleased to meet you. I don't think important men like us with spectacular totally earned credentials like we have should argue, there is just no winning. it took me 21 yrs of schooling to become an adequate starship captain, how long did it take you to get that med license? i do love these internets

 

[vivame]

Oh i must apologize, where are my manners. we didn't do proper introductions.

I'm so pleased to meet you "DR. Jim" my name is "STARSHIP CAPTAIN BILLY" I'm very pleased to meet you. I don't think important men like us with spectacular totally earned credentials like we have should argue, there is just no winning. it took me 21 yrs of schooling to become an adequate starship captain, how long did it take you to get that med license? i do love these internets

Wow, you went from "private source" to douchebag in just 7 posts!

 

[usaspetz]

this is an issue in the "USAspetz" thread in the underground here as well. Thanks for reposting.

The issue is being looked at by my supplier! no one would deny that this is disconforting to say the least and things must be made right, however, its been 48 Hrs and I've yet to see the actual proof, so far there is just "he says", im sure that's not good enough for you guys, right?