Labmax - Pharmacom (Darius) T-E, Primo, EQ, Tren

flenser

New Member
AnabolicLab.com Supporter
Darius sent me these specifically to lab max. They are from the batch following the ones I previously posted.

Test E. Looks like a pass to me.
d-te-ab-jpg.24400
d-te-uv-jpg.24401


Tren - also looks like a pass to me
d-tr-ab-jpg.24402

d-tr-uv-jpg.24403


More to follow..
 

Attachments

  • D-te-ab.jpg
    D-te-ab.jpg
    33.5 KB · Views: 312
  • D-te-uv.jpg
    D-te-uv.jpg
    20 KB · Views: 309
  • D-tr-ab.jpg
    D-tr-ab.jpg
    25.1 KB · Views: 308
  • D-tr-uv.jpg
    D-tr-uv.jpg
    33 KB · Views: 309
EQ - Another pass - the blue is about the same as the last batch, so I assume it's the same second peak (269) from the mass spec ??
d-eq-ab-jpg.24404

d-eq-uv-jpg.24405


Primo - Maybe pass, but check out the last image. That is EQ on the left and Primo on the right.
d-pr-ab-jpg.24406

d-pr-uv1-jpg.24407

d-pr-uv2-jpg.24408

d-eq-prim-uv-jpg.24409
 

Attachments

  • D-eq-ab.jpg
    D-eq-ab.jpg
    33.1 KB · Views: 302
  • D-eq-uv.jpg
    D-eq-uv.jpg
    33.6 KB · Views: 300
  • D-pr-ab.jpg
    D-pr-ab.jpg
    43.3 KB · Views: 302
  • D-pr-uv1.jpg
    D-pr-uv1.jpg
    32.1 KB · Views: 301
  • D-pr-uv2.jpg
    D-pr-uv2.jpg
    26.6 KB · Views: 300
  • D-EQ-PRIM-UV.jpg
    D-EQ-PRIM-UV.jpg
    21.3 KB · Views: 300
Darius sent me these specifically to lab max. They are from the batch following the ones I previously posted.

Test E. Looks like a pass to me.
d-te-ab-jpg.24400
d-te-uv-jpg.24401


Tren - also looks like a pass to me
d-tr-ab-jpg.24402

d-tr-uv-jpg.24403


More to follow..
Thanks for all these test man.
 
Darius sent me these specifically to lab max. They are from the batch following the ones I previously posted.

Test E. Looks like a pass to me.
d-te-ab-jpg.24400
d-te-uv-jpg.24401


Tren - also looks like a pass to me
d-tr-ab-jpg.24402

d-tr-uv-jpg.24403


More to follow..

Aot of us really appreciate what you do for the meso family flesner. Thanks for taking the time to do all of these tests. Much respect.
 
I am sure his primo is test enan in fact.

I had good primo and it is very nice golden - yellow glow, no blue shit inside.

I do not know what kind of oil he is using but if it is even GSO, the test enan should really glow with 300 mg/ml, it is underdosed I do not think that it might be even 200 mg/ml
 
I am sure his primo is test enan in fact.

I had good primo and it is very nice golden - yellow glow, no blue shit inside.

I do not know what kind of oil he is using but if it is even GSO, the test enan should really glow with 300 mg/ml, it is underdosed I do not think that it might be even 200 mg/ml
From the UV response I'm pretty sure the oil is GSO. With other oils, even with little or no aas, the UV light goes right through. All I got from these tests was a surface reflection.

Take a look at the primo test in the other thread. It looked just like test enan as well, but mass spec showed it to have a MW of 681. I'm super curious about what that might be. It's not the MW (or multiple of) any aas I know of.
 
From the UV response I'm pretty sure the oil is GSO. With other oils, even with little or no aas, the UV light goes right through. All I got from these tests was a surface reflection.

Take a look at the primo test in the other thread. It looked just like test enan as well, but mass spec showed it to have a MW of 681. I'm super curious about what that might be. It's not the MW (or multiple of) any aas I know of.

Dont know why but its kinda funny that nobody, even not the seller, has an idea what this could be...
 
Dont know why but its kinda funny that nobody, even not the seller, has an idea what this could be...
We really need someone smarter than me looking at this stuff. I could be making some really stupid assumptions here.

For example, both mass specs have the same 681 peak, just the second one is smaller than the first. OR.. is the scale on the plots different. I don't know how intensity is defined. Maybe it's just a carrier. I don't know..
 
From the UV response I'm pretty sure the oil is GSO. With other oils, even with little or no aas, the UV light goes right through. All I got from these tests was a surface reflection.

Take a look at the primo test in the other thread. It looked just like test enan as well, but mass spec showed it to have a MW of 681. I'm super curious about what that might be. It's not the MW (or multiple of) any aas I know of.

There was a lot of primo tested all over the place and results posted, good ones had the golden - yellow glow. I do not know what to say about this.

here is labmax

http://www.labmax.ca/primobolan.php

they had their samples were carefully tested and verified

maybe there is primo but contaminated with other steroids, we see this very often and this is why it comes out strange on labmax test.
 
There was a lot of primo tested all over the place and results posted, good ones had the golden - yellow glow. I do not know what to say about this.

here is labmax

http://www.labmax.ca/primobolan.php

they had their samples were carefully tested and verified

maybe there is primo but contaminated with other steroids, we see this very often and this is why it comes out strange on labmax test.
The mass spec is the first one listed here. I would be interested in your analysis..

https://thinksteroids.com/community...e-eq-and-primo.134365131/page-14#post-1300140
 
is the primo the vial that Darius says was mislabeled, or a new vial.
 
I am sure his primo is test enan in fact.

I had good primo and it is very nice golden - yellow glow, no blue shit inside.

I do not know what kind of oil he is using but if it is even GSO, the test enan should really glow with 300 mg/ml, it is underdosed I do not think that it might be even 200 mg/ml

The pictures on labmax site is using pure powder and shows a ton of glow.

I thought labmax couldn't show the concentration based on glow alone ? Doesn't the carrier oil and solvents/suspension agents have a large affect on the glow of the product ?
 
The pictures on labmax site is using pure powder and shows a ton of glow.

I thought labmax couldn't show the concentration based on glow alone ? Doesn't the carrier oil and solvents/suspension agents have a large affect on the glow of the product ?

I have tested a lot of shit over the years, they guys always bring something new to the gym.

I have noticed that GSO affects only testosterone enanthate at low concentration, at very high the glow should be very bright no matter what carrier you use.

It makes sense the more you dissolved the less glow you should get.

But I can be mistaken there might be more involved.
 
Back
Top