Took some.pics.. both sources for tbol powder was legit. And the superdrol as well happy about that. Clear as day legit u def have to use a super super super small amount n it looks the same color as pics if to much like first time I did it colors were superdark. I used like a spec of powder.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Labmax test results
- Thread starter Gunrunner
- Start date
swanny1234
New Member
Not sure if this was asked somewhere in this thread but didn't see it. Do they make a test for tbol? Didn't see it on their website.
swanny1234
New Member
Perfect, thank you.
Did anyone test Ascendant Labs Mast E or Deca?
I could actually vouch for you since by buddy is running arctic gear test as we speak.
@Bkent, Thank you. All we need is bloods. 
Gape Van Damme
New Member
Noob question. I've never used pharma grade gear, so I don't know shit about ampules. Are the two plastic cylinders that come with the testing A/B vials the ampule opener?
Gape Van Damme
New Member
As promised, I tested PEP's Test Prop.
First, I'd like to say that I don't think that little bit of fluorescence in Bkent's test should meet the threshold for proof of Pass/Fail. For instance, I think the florescence should be as pronounced as on the website. But, I don't have much experience with this, so maybe guys like Flenser can weigh in.
This angers me, because I have a good amount of Pep gear on hand.
I don't have before/after pictures, take that for what it's worth, I don't give a fuck. I have one before picture and both vials, A and B, both look brown. It was too hard to see any fluorescence under UV light with Pep's shit, which since I didn't know what to expect from the test, I chose not to take a picture.
I fucked myself, because instead of using the test on a known source (Astro's Test E, which I have bloods to back-up that it's legit), I started with Pep's Test P, and since it was my first time, was initially unsure of how to interpret the results. There was little florescence, but mostly the vial was just brown, both under UV and normal light. There were little flecks of fluorescence, but mostly it was just brown. BTW, I have a rated UV light between 365nm-375nm.
Anyways, I saw LITTLE fluorescence on the Test P, not the glowing vials the website shows. After testing two different Pep Test P vials that came in my shipment, I decided to test Astro's Test E as a control. Astro's Test E displayed the pronounced fluorescence I expected from the test.
In my opinion, though it has hurt me for $400 in Pep Test P and Sustanon, I would have to say that PEP's TEST P was a FAIL. I ordered early January.
Before picture: Both look brown as shit. I use imgur, because it removes EXIF data.
http ://imgur.com/sYAPau7
First, I'd like to say that I don't think that little bit of fluorescence in Bkent's test should meet the threshold for proof of Pass/Fail. For instance, I think the florescence should be as pronounced as on the website. But, I don't have much experience with this, so maybe guys like Flenser can weigh in.
This angers me, because I have a good amount of Pep gear on hand.
I don't have before/after pictures, take that for what it's worth, I don't give a fuck. I have one before picture and both vials, A and B, both look brown. It was too hard to see any fluorescence under UV light with Pep's shit, which since I didn't know what to expect from the test, I chose not to take a picture.
I fucked myself, because instead of using the test on a known source (Astro's Test E, which I have bloods to back-up that it's legit), I started with Pep's Test P, and since it was my first time, was initially unsure of how to interpret the results. There was little florescence, but mostly the vial was just brown, both under UV and normal light. There were little flecks of fluorescence, but mostly it was just brown. BTW, I have a rated UV light between 365nm-375nm.
Anyways, I saw LITTLE fluorescence on the Test P, not the glowing vials the website shows. After testing two different Pep Test P vials that came in my shipment, I decided to test Astro's Test E as a control. Astro's Test E displayed the pronounced fluorescence I expected from the test.
In my opinion, though it has hurt me for $400 in Pep Test P and Sustanon, I would have to say that PEP's TEST P was a FAIL. I ordered early January.
Before picture: Both look brown as shit. I use imgur, because it removes EXIF data.
http ://imgur.com/sYAPau7
Gape Van Damme
New Member
Not shitting on you, brother, just saying I think the legit passes, especially of Test, jumped out bright in your face.
BIO MAST E - FAIL
PEP MAST E - FAIL
ASTRO MAST E - FAIL
I was hoping to say we have a winner, but unfortunately no.
PEP MAST E - FAIL
ASTRO MAST E - FAIL
I was hoping to say we have a winner, but unfortunately no.
Labmax said:
Let down
Shit!!! Even Astro gear?? IDK... maybe pharm grade is the only option anymore. UGLs are too damn disappointing.
Must be an issue in the supplie chain somewhere for all three to have failed and probably all from the same supplier
I don't think there is any pharm grade mast e. It's a UGL invention. Otherwise labmax could just buy the standard to calibrate their test.
Guess That seals the deal on my pep test p.
So does anyone want some premium paper weights?
Good thing I have a trt doc to write a test p script.
So does anyone want some premium paper weights?
Good thing I have a trt doc to write a test p script.
Spyder
New Member
Just to clarify Flenser this is straight from labmax (saw the quote). Also, was mass spec run?
This was the result of GC/MS testing. There's no question of the results. There were no concentration tests done, though. His comments on concentration I posted in Astro's thread are not quantitative as he's not setup for that yet.
Similar threads
Sponsors
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic- Latest: Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
-
