Liberty Reserve (digital currency) seized by U.S. government

Millard

Member
Staff member
10+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
LibertyReserve.com, one of the most "anonymous" digital currencies, has been shut down and seized by the federal government with its owner arrested in Spain:

U.S. federal law enforcement agencies on Tuesday announced the closure and seizure of Liberty Reserve, an online, virtual currency that the U.S. government alleges acted as “a financial hub of the cyber-crime world” and processed more more than $6 billion in criminal proceeds over the past seven years.

Read more: U.S. Government Seizes LibertyReserve.com — Krebs on Security

Owner arrested:

The founder of the Liberty Reserve digital currency business has been arrested in Spain on money-laundering charges, Costa Rican authorities have said.

Officials in the Central American country said in a statement that Arthur Budovsky had been detained as part of an investigation that also involved US authorities.

Police raided three homes and five businesses linked to the Costa-Rica-based Liberty Reserve and seized papers and digital documents that will be turned over to US authorities, the statement said. A Russian citizen was also arrested in the case in Costa Rica on Friday and will be extradited to the US, it said.

Budovsky, a naturalised Costa Rican citizen, was detained on Friday. He had renounced his US citizenship and become a resident and citizen of Costa Rica, Costa Rican authorities said.

Liberty Reserve is a company that allows users to apply for an account by supplying a valid email address. Once a person signs up for an account, Liberty Reserve gives them a user name and an account number and they can start transferring money around the world, Costa Rican officials said.

Read more: Liberty Reserve founder arrested in Spain | World news | guardian.co.uk

The federal indictment USA v. Liberty Researve & Arthur Budovsky (PDF):

http://krebsonsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Liberty-Reserve-et-al.-Indictment.pdf
 
Freedom is a quickly fading illusion.

All LR did was move money around, is the US alleging that he laundered his own profits? Or charging him for aiding others in money laundering?
 
Freedom is a quickly fading illusion.

All LR did was move money around, is the US alleging that he laundered his own profits? Or charging him for aiding others in money laundering?

There's more to the story - the indictment is an interesting read if you have time.

Here's the fed's summary of how Liberty Reserve operated (via indictment):

THE CRIMINAL DESIGN OF LIBERTY RESERVE

14. To use LIBERTY RESERVE'S digital currency, commonly referred to as "LR," a user first was required to open an account through the LIBERTY RESERVE website. In registering, the user was required to provide basic identifying information, such as name, address, and date of birth. However, unlike traditional banks or legitimate online payment processors, LIBERTY RESERVE did not require users to validate their identity information, such as by providing official identification documents or a credit card. Accounts could therefore be opened easily using fictitious or anonymous identities.

15. Once a user established an account with LIBERTY RESERVE, the user could then conduct transactions with other LIBERTY RESERVE users. That is, the user could receive transfers of LR from other users' accounts, and transfer LR from his own account to other users - including any "merchants" that accepted LR as payment. LIBERTY RESERVE charged a one-percent fee every time a user transferred LR to another user through the LIBERTY RESERVE system. In addition, for an additional "privacy fee" of 75 cents per transaction, a user could hide his own LIBERTY RESERVE account number when transferring funds, effectively making the transfer completely untraceable, even within LIBERTY RESERVE'S already opaque system.

16. To add an additional layer of anonymity, LIBERTY RESERVE did not permit users to fund their accounts by transferring money to LIBERTY RESERVE directly, such as by issuing a credit card payment or wire transfer to LIBERTY RESERVE. Nor could LIBERTY RESERVE users withdraw funds from their accounts directly, such as through an ATM withdrawal. Instead, LIBERTY RESERVE users were required to make any deposits or withdrawals through the use of third-party "exchangers," thus enabling LIBERTY RESERVE to avoid collecting any information about its users through banking transactions or other activity that would leave a centralized financial paper trail.

17. LIBERTY RESERVE'S "exchangers" were third-party entities that maintained direct financial relationships with LIBERTY RESERVE, buying and selling LR in bulk from LIBERTY RESERVE in exchange for mainstream currency. The exchangers in turn bought and sold this LR in smaller transactions with end users in exchange for mainstream currency. Thus, in order to fund a LIBERTY RESERVE account, a user was required to transmit mainstream currency in some fashion (through a money remitter, for example) to an exchanger. Upon receiving the user's payment, the exchanger credited the user's LIBERTY RESERVE account with a corresponding amount of LR, by transferring LR from the exchanger's LIBERTY RESERVE account to the user's account. Similarly, if a LIBERTY RESERVE user wished to withdraw funds from his account, the user was required to transfer LR from his LIBERTY RESERVE account to an exchanger's LIBERTY RESERVE account, and the exchanger then made arrangements to provide the user a corresponding amount of mainstream currency.
 
ahh another one down:eek: he to use this for services paid for. It seem like green dot is the way to go these day as far as paying input the code and there you go. of course im not sure how this works on the other end? do you feel this is a better way in a hypothetical since
 
Last edited:
Greendot can be used, and is safe for the consumer, but dangerous for the source. There are ways to mitigate risk for the source, but nothing is definite, and greendot poses unique risks similar to PayPal.
 
Last edited:
They carry all that risk in exchange for 1% of the transferred funds. Meanwhile those assholes at PayPal charged me nearly $100 for a transaction of less than 3k.

The fact that our government doesn't only have the ability to screw us over but extradite citizens from other countries and try them under our corrupt laws is disgusting.
 
Ahh, damn mispellings. Millard, why don't users have the ability to edit posts after a couple minutes?

because it would be too much fun for anyone to handle if you could start an argument with someone, and then edit your posts so it looks like they're completely insane.
 
And most people won't care. It doesn't affect them. What most people don't realize is they'll have their liberty stripped from them not in one major action. It's the thousand little laws that gets us.

People thought I was crazy for voting Gary Johnson.
 
Speaking of those Government schmucks,
I still didn't get my Federal tax check :confused:

I am pretty sure the US Government would
Benefit, from a financial advisor...

They are really not good, with money
 
Back
Top