Lmao!

Grizzly

New Member
I just thought this post I found on another board was hilarious.

"What a lot of strength athletes don't understand is that bodybuilding is totally different. A whole different type of hypertophy that requires vastly different exotic training methods that rarely get results and generally require anabolics to break 200lbs. Let me tell you all that building significant muscle mass on a Yoda-esque program using exotic rep schemes on cables and machines, days of dedicated biceps training, with an overbearing focus on trace mineral balance and insufficient caloric intake makes it really hard to put on muscle. These guys have to have it all together to show any appreciable gains.

Guys that eat and are able to rely on basic programs to increase their weights in squats, pulls, and presses doing basic exercises that strengthen the body and force it to adapt with increased muscle have it easy. They will never know what it's like to fight through moronic inefficiency to needlessly differentiate your training and alleviate worry that when you eventually do start gaining weight someday, it will be in perfect symmetry and proportion - all at 2lbs a year."
 
Last edited:
When I first started reading I thought, "Here we go again." Then... "They will never know what it's like to fight through moronic inefficiency to needlessly differentiate your training". That's pretty well said.
 
I caught that too.....There was contradiction to their point, used to make their point.
 
LOL Yeah, it's sarcastic. It's originally posted in a thread on Dave Gulledge's physique transformation. It addresses several of the misconceptions bb's have about pl's and how bodybuilders and pl's must train sooooooo dramatically different otherwise the bb's will never look any good.

It must not have the same effect out of context or something. Within the confines of that thread, I thought it was hilarious.
 

Sponsors

Back
Top