Kubrick
New Member
Thats ridiculous! Who knows what the other 45% actually is. I always thought GET-M was better than this. I've never used their gear but heard great things. This is some sloppy, amateur stuff.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Mass Spec Thread
- Thread starter MythotiK
- Start date
Thats ridiculous! Who knows what the other 45% actually is. I always thought GET-M was better than this. I've never used their gear but heard great things. This is some sloppy, amateur stuff.
mercury
New Member
this is total mess.
Mast P - actually DECA
Deca - actually Test
He has no clue what he is mixing.
Mast P - actually DECA
Deca - actually Test
He has no clue what he is mixing.
They have been built up by vets over the years that got great results, but never actually tested their products. Substituting deca for mast is classic, for example. They've probably been doing that so long people would complain if they put mast in there. Wouldn't have the same effect.
BIGMESC
New Member
I believe it is worse then that, Deca and Test E I believe are easily distinguishable from each other in there raw form.
tileguy123
New Member
Ridiculous !!!!
tileguy123
New Member
These results really need to be made available to other forums ... Spread the word guys .. No one should be getting away with this kind of mix up . Come on now
whodatnation
New Member
Wow just wow. And luckily I survived another UGL that I really contemplated ordering from. Weird on how screwed up the compounds are with some being overdosed
illuminatty
New Member
Holy Jesus! I've used getm anavar and test e but they were good. I was going to place an order but I guess not anymore. I guess naps it is...
Thanks Messy! These results reveal one of the biggest problems in the AAS black market, right now!
We get gear that has "something" in it, and it does "something" for us, so we think it is g2g. Little do we know, it is not as advertised and we are running compounds that we don't even know we are putting in our bodies.
We get gear that has "something" in it, and it does "something" for us, so we think it is g2g. Little do we know, it is not as advertised and we are running compounds that we don't even know we are putting in our bodies.
mercury
New Member
I had some NAPS GS/MS tested a while ago, so I do not know the situation today.
But some of the tests results posted by NAPS were faked. Some of the gear was good some bunk.
Bet that primo has a hell of a bite. Atleast its legit though.
Depends on what's in the 45% that's NOT primo.
Still a lot of powder to have dissolved. If its something that falls out of solution easy well.......fuxk that.
olrocko
New Member
Makes me wonder if I've ever had decent gear.
When you do you can tell the difference big time. Its night and day difference.
You ever do bloods
Sent from my RM-917_nam_usa_100 using Tapatalk
Sent from my RM-917_nam_usa_100 using Tapatalk
I'm in the same boat on this. Another bullet dodged. Whenever i think i want to order i should wait a month and see what happens. It seems to be working so far. Those tests are a mess. They make me want to dig up some posts by people who are loving the mast and see what they say. I am pretty sure i would know the difference between deca and just about anything else just through half a cycle.
If this was directed at me yea I do bloods all the time. I am not on right now because we are trying to get pregnant but I am prescribed test so I have to get bloods done. And you can tell a big difference when its dosed correctly or close
And 55% purity isn't terrible for primo. The other 45% is prolly left over primo no eater and the acid that is used to make the ester, along with small amounts of impurities. Not really a ton to worry about unless they are mixing in contaminants themselves atleast according to Patrick Arnold. And I dont what yall expected as far as primo goes. You dont normally find better. Sad but true
Dont get me wrong he is still a shit source and the lack of quality control for a lab this size is appalling.
Could have been a different batch. Batches are going to vary greatly on quality.
My very first "cycle" included mast p from AMA. This was before labmax was available. I was so happy with the results I boasted on another board about how mast p helped my cut. When labmax showed up I tested what was left in the vial, and it was deca. Clueless, I was...
