MLB drug results to be public??

  • Thread starter Thread starter KTCKSports
  • Start date Start date
K

KTCKSports

Guest
Hey y'all,

Did you hear the news that the Grand jury subpoenaded BALCO for MLB drug testing? The players were tested and the results were supposed to be confidential. However if the grand jury gets a hold of this information which is it asking for, the names of all the positive tests may be of public record.

I hope these results become public. I am curious to see who other then that a-hole Barry Bonds is on AAS.

Have a nice day
K-
 
KTCKSports said:
Hey y'all,

Did you hear the news that the Grand jury subpoenaded BALCO for MLB drug testing? The players were tested and the results were supposed to be confidential. However if the grand jury gets a hold of this information which is it asking for, the names of all the positive tests may be of public record.

I hope these results become public. I am curious to see who other then that a-hole Barry Bonds is on AAS.

Have a nice day
K-

Bonds may be an a-hole, but he is still the king. Juice didn't make him either way. He just got better at working the count, etc. Great player! The next time people question the home run record, why don't they ponder the fact that "the babe" could have have had so many more HR's if he weren't a drunken, womanizing piece of shit!!!! Aaron was a great person, but Barry is just better!
 
BOnds is a fucking asshole. Not even close to the greatest and is the worst team player imaginable. Bonds is one of the best all around players but if you think steroids didn't get him from a 40 homerun person a year to 70 or more if he gets pitched to than you r retarded. Babe ruth might have been a womanizer and alcoholic. Who gives a fuck. Hit more homers than other teams combined. Played like 12 games less per season with a hacky sack of a ball. There is no way to compare the fucks of today with the fucks in the past. Aaron seems like a class act. Bonds is a disgrace. SOme pitcher needs to take him out for good. Armor wearing pussy. Loads up in catchers gear and crowds the plate. Cocksucker needs a 95 mph fastball in his ugly mug. I hope deadguy makes it and maybe he will get it done lol
consistent1 said:
Bonds may be an a-hole, but he is still the king. Juice didn't make him either way. He just got better at working the count, etc. Great player! The next time people question the home run record, why don't they ponder the fact that "the babe" could have have had so many more HR's if he weren't a drunken, womanizing piece of shit!!!! Aaron was a great person, but Barry is just better!
 
Thick, sounds like youre looking forward to a Clemens-Piazza-type incident with Bonds. ;)
 
I would love it. SOmeone needs to knock that fucker out. And the clowns that try comparing the babe and bonds are retarded. You cant compare. different ball, 12 more games all sorts of different circumstances that make it impossible to compare past players with todays overpaid fuckwads like Bonds. All records after around 1980 should be started separately or the new records should have astericks.
Bob Smith said:
Thick, sounds like youre looking forward to a Clemens-Piazza-type incident with Bonds. ;)
 
thick said:
BOnds is a fucking asshole. Not even close to the greatest and is the worst team player imaginable. Bonds is one of the best all around players but if you think steroids didn't get him from a 40 homerun person a year to 70 or more if he gets pitched to than you r retarded. Babe ruth might have been a womanizer and alcoholic. Who gives a fuck. Hit more homers than other teams combined. Played like 12 games less per season with a hacky sack of a ball. There is no way to compare the fucks of today with the fucks in the past. Aaron seems like a class act. Bonds is a disgrace. SOme pitcher needs to take him out for good. Armor wearing pussy. Loads up in catchers gear and crowds the plate. Cocksucker needs a 95 mph fastball in his ugly mug. I hope deadguy makes it and maybe he will get it done lol

BTW, I hate most "old school" arguments. I will agree with you about the equipment deal, but they let him do it. He has been around a long time and will never get 70 again IMO because he will never get pitched too enough again. These modern guys would tear up the old time pitchers. I can't believe how many times I have seen guys on gear based boards bash Bonds for using. The people here should know that while it helps, timing and laying off pitches is more important. It's not as simple as getting juiced up, that's what the media wants you to believe. Let's get some ass-wipe reporter on a good cycle and see how he does. With the amount of money involved in modern contracts, I would be more willing to bash a guy who doesn't do all that he can to prepare. Bonds, Sosa, McGwire...all of them deserve credit, and no, I am not retarded in any way. It's called a difference of opinion. :D
 
consistent1 said:
BTW, I hate most "old school" arguments. I will agree with you about the equipment deal, but they let him do it. He has been around a long time and will never get 70 again IMO because he will never get pitched too enough again. These modern guys would tear up the old time pitchers. I can't believe how many times I have seen guys on gear based boards bash Bonds for using. The people here should know that while it helps, timing and laying off pitches is more important. It's not as simple as getting juiced up, that's what the media wants you to believe. Let's get some ass-wipe reporter on a good cycle and see how he does. With the amount of money involved in modern contracts, I would be more willing to bash a guy who doesn't do all that he can to prepare. Bonds, Sosa, McGwire...all of them deserve credit, and no, I am not retarded in any way. It's called a difference of opinion. :D

totally agree, roids and barrys record? i don't see the correlation? so many people want to to discredit him because of the BALCO scandal, don't get me wrong i'm not a fan of his but the guy deserves some credit ...
 
Take an excellent hitter and add 40 pounds of muscle, he becomes an outstanding hitter, ala Bonds. He already had the talent and technique, but adding so much muscle and power is what catapulted him to the top of the game.
 
that's why u hockey and nascar fuckers are so easily duped. I said bonds is damn good. But if you guys think at age 38 he added 40 pounds and hit 30 more homers than his career high (just estimates b/c i dont want to look up that fucktards stats) b/c of his talent you are smoking crack. I am not even close to one of those idiots who say steroids are the only reason he is good. W/o steroids he would still go down as one of the top 10 players of all time. He just WOULD NOT BE THE HOMERUN KING. end of story. Steroids obviously dont make you a good player. Like bob said, they can turn a great player into truely awesome or an above average major league player into an allstar.
big louie said:
totally agree, roids and barrys record? i don't see the correlation? so many people want to to discredit him because of the BALCO scandal, don't get me wrong i'm not a fan of his but the guy deserves some credit ...
 
Chip Bronson said:
hey guys, what's a good stack for a competitive weekend bowler?.... :D



yes i'm the current Carnival Cruise Line shuffleboard champion and i would like to bulk up for the up and coming tourney with Princess. any recommendations greatly appreciated.
 
how many cycles will it take for me to start bowling a 250 game? and i don't like drinking those weight-gain shakes either. they make my ass hurt...
 
Hey, I can hit par 5s in two. :D

I remember playing at a course back home on a 530-550 yard par 5. I ended up blasting the ball about 20 yards over the green in two.
 
The women's tees dont count :)
Bob Smith said:
Hey, I can hit par 5s in two. :D

I remember playing at a course back home on a 530-550 yard par 5. I ended up blasting the ball about 20 yards over the green in two.
 
Hey Dick, thats why I said it was a 530 yard hole. That indicates the distance from the tees I played from.

Now go back to your gold senior citizen teebox.
 
Well some people say it is a 600 yard hole and than tee up with the broads so i wasn't sure. Sorry about that. I have gotten a couple of double eagles on par 5's. been a long time though
Bob Smith said:
Hey Dick, thats why I said it was a 530 yard hole. That indicates the distance from the tees I played from.

Now go back to your gold senior citizen teebox.
 
Ive never gotten a double eagle, but have had a few regular eagles.

Whats your longest drive (in the fairway)? So far mine is 329.
 
I have driven par 4's before much longer than that. I guess i cant answer how far exactly. I have played so many courses it is impossible to keep track. Several courses I have played have that awesome downhill hole where your ball will roll forever and u can drive the green. As for the par 5 that I have double eagled two times it is around a 450 or 460 yard par 5. both times I drove to 90-100 yards away and wedged the second shot in. I was in highschool and did this twice in a matter of just a week or two. Havent done it since but I also dont hardly golf anymore. Used to golf all the time
 
Back
Top