Musclefactorylabs

mass spec easily faked? of COURSE you dont want mass spec when you are pushing underdosed products... makes sense. how much store credit does it take to get a properly dosed oil with no male contraceptives? and how many months will it take to get there?

The fact that mass spec reports are easily faked is a fact. A person with a little computer knowledge could easily use an old report as a template to fabricate a new one. This is why I encourage everyone to get their bloods while on cycle. Blood tests don't lie and underdosed test will clearly show.

As I have said before, I am working on some major changes to make sure we never have to deal with this issue again. I can't promise a 3-4 day delivery but I can work on improving my inventory management better. The whole reason people are waiting for over 4 weeks are due to 1) I never received payment info 2) I ran out of stock.

I understand it's hard to trust my word, but I am doing everything I can to make amends for my mistakes. I'm not running away. I am always going to take care of my customers who have invested their hard earned money... That's a promise. None of this was ever intentional. If it were, I would be going public and launching a huge sale.
 
Last edited:
The fact that mass spec reports are easily faked is a fact. A person with a little computer knowledge could easily use an old report as a template to fabricate a new one. This is why I encourage everyone to get their bloods while on cycle. Blood tests don't lie and underdosed test will clearly show.

As I have said before, I am working on some major changes to make sure we never have to deal with this issue again. I can't promise a 3-4 delivery but I can work on improving my inventory management better. The whole reason people are waiting for over 4 weeks is due to 1) I never received payment info 2) I ran out of stock.

I understand it's hard to trust my word, but I am doing everything I can to make amends for my mistakes. I'm not running away. I am always going to taking care of my customers who have invested their hard earned money... That's a promise. None of this was ever intentional. If it were, I would be going public and launching a huge sale.

Then keep showing up and understand you're going to have some shit thrown your way..
 
Then keep showing up and understand you're going to have some shit thrown your way..

I understand that and you have every right to be mad at me. But I am here to take care of those who were affected by my mistakes, nothing else. Im content with just the roof over my head and food on the table. I'm not looking to make a quick buck and I'm in this business for the long run.

I want to say sorry for everyone who has misplaced their trust with me and I hope to make it up to the community in time.
 
The fact that mass spec reports are easily faked is a fact. A person with a little computer knowledge could easily use an old report as a template to fabricate a new one. This is why I encourage everyone to get their bloods while on cycle. Blood tests don't lie and underdosed test will clearly show.

As I have said before, I am working on some major changes to make sure we never have to deal with this issue again. I can't promise a 3-4 delivery but I can work on improving my inventory management better. The whole reason people are waiting for over 4 weeks is due to 1) I never received payment info 2) I ran out of stock.

I understand it's hard to trust my word, but I am doing everything I can to make amends for my mistakes. I'm not running away. I am always going to taking care of my customers who have invested their hard earned money... That's a promise. None of this was ever intentional. If it were, I would be going public and launching a huge sale.

You have a point about how easy they would be to fake. However, mythotik is a neutral party and I dont see how giving credit for a test that goes through him would be detrimental.

I have 3 blood tests, 2 with actual value and 5-6 labmax credits that I haven't cashed in. Thats a decent bit of gear I could get on credit that I don't want. That is, unless/until we start to see good mass specs. Both from you and customers.
 
As any man with sufficient wisdom might be, I am suspicious, but all hope is not lost. From the outset, Ricky seems to have been open and responsive.

I have heard that his raw source has recently been outed as a known shipper of low purity raws. It is possible that if Ricky is at fault for anything it is poor quality control. Let's be objective. Almost none of Ricky's peers reliably test their raws. At this point, expecting any small lab to ensure a high-purity correctly-dosed product is unwise. Still, that's no excuse.

I have no dog in this fight and I am truly dismayed at recent developments, but it is possible that Ricky could learn from his mistakes. If Ricky implements quantitative testing and produces quality high-purity products (continually independently verified), I think he would have a truly significant competitive advantage. Another lab claims to be testing and outing his shifty raw suppliers, perhaps Ricky would benefit by joining them in this endeavor.

Keep upping your game, Ricky. Maybe, against all odds, you can fix this. Not holding my breath. Not counting you out.
 
Last edited:
Well its good to see ricky on this board .he does respond to emails ....hopefully he will resolve all these issues and compensate everyone who has bad gear. And do It as fast as possible. Making sure this will never happen again and speeding up delivery time....maybe he can bounce back......
 
I recieved some replacement sust. Today. He made me aware that he had test prop that passed labmax and the melting point but is still waiting on the mass spec. He told me if I wanted it he would send it ASAP and I said yes . I didn't expect the sust today . So I have some test. Let's see how it goes.
 
you can gain more insight on mass specs from the metadata that comes in the file.

it can show you various things such as geolocation of where the report was made, ip address of where it was made, time, etc etc..

you can tell from that information sometimes if the report is BS or not
 
Regardless if you have 3 vials or 100, I will compensate and replace it if it's no good. That's my guarantee.
Ricky, or anyone else, can you tell me if any of these are known bad? Don't want to waste time testing something already tested with known results.

Deca 1049
Test c 8001
Test c 3749
Test e 5520
Test p 8090
Test p 2254
Test p 9001
equipoise 7010
Mast p 1030
dianabol 1800
Winstrol 7840
 
He guys so i have some test c, batch # 7574 and I'm wondering whats the deal with that one. Also after checking it appears one has like some pieces inside, but they appear to be like dust or something?? Now should this batch be good, would it be safe to use that or not?
 
I would never touch anything with floaters....
What causes floaters? I mean, when I first received them they were clear now one of them looks like it has like really tiny, almost unnoticeable peices of dust in it, and another looks like it might as well. Does it have to do with temperature or storage?
 
Back
Top