newbie23
New Member
I would also like to add to my post for Toolman:
I understand that you want the best care available and you have the money and or insurance to pay for it, so that is fine but there are many guys out there that do not have insurance or much money to pay for there proper care and they have lousy testosterone levels. This is common because most people with low income have carb enriched diets, mac and cheese is cheap but salmon is not.
So what I see with these guys is they just want to feel better and do not have the money to get a 60 panel test every 6 weeks, does this mean we should deprive them of testosterone that will improve there quality of life? Does this mean we should deprive them of supplementation because they do not have the money to closely monitor everything going on in there body?
Think of all the pills they hand out to everyone, viagra, lipitor, anti depressants + many more
Don't think for a second those aren't jacking up there lipids and clogging up there liver while simultaneously suppressing there testosterone most of the time.. Someone will scream "there is no study that proves that", these are the same people that do not realize that the pharm company that produces said medication are the ones responsible for the studies, who is to say they give you the positive results and not the negative? and yes it has happened before multiple times, I can't remember the most recent but it was something like the medication proved to be 70% effective on the initial release, then later they were taken to court when the full data came out and it was only 30% effective and was giving people heart attacks. medication that has only been around for 5 years, not 70 like testosterone.
Should we not allow them an affordable way to get FDA approved testosterone? I don't think so, simply because its not dangerous, and it the effects of low testosterone and insulin resistance are probably much worse for them than a 2x per year 4 panel blood test that they can afford and be happy on.
JustMy2Cents
I understand that you want the best care available and you have the money and or insurance to pay for it, so that is fine but there are many guys out there that do not have insurance or much money to pay for there proper care and they have lousy testosterone levels. This is common because most people with low income have carb enriched diets, mac and cheese is cheap but salmon is not.
So what I see with these guys is they just want to feel better and do not have the money to get a 60 panel test every 6 weeks, does this mean we should deprive them of testosterone that will improve there quality of life? Does this mean we should deprive them of supplementation because they do not have the money to closely monitor everything going on in there body?
Think of all the pills they hand out to everyone, viagra, lipitor, anti depressants + many more
Don't think for a second those aren't jacking up there lipids and clogging up there liver while simultaneously suppressing there testosterone most of the time.. Someone will scream "there is no study that proves that", these are the same people that do not realize that the pharm company that produces said medication are the ones responsible for the studies, who is to say they give you the positive results and not the negative? and yes it has happened before multiple times, I can't remember the most recent but it was something like the medication proved to be 70% effective on the initial release, then later they were taken to court when the full data came out and it was only 30% effective and was giving people heart attacks. medication that has only been around for 5 years, not 70 like testosterone.
Should we not allow them an affordable way to get FDA approved testosterone? I don't think so, simply because its not dangerous, and it the effects of low testosterone and insulin resistance are probably much worse for them than a 2x per year 4 panel blood test that they can afford and be happy on.
JustMy2Cents
Last edited: