FatGoku
New Member
Hello everyone, I saw this "new member introduction" thread so I thought I'd give it a try plus ask a question which I have always wondered about.
Been training for 10+ years now and have probably exhausted 95% of my natty gains so I am doing some preliminary research about enhancement.
My question is, since testosterone has a decent amount of androgenic side effects with a 100:100 anabolic/androgenic ratio, would it not be a smarter idea to rely more on less androgenic compounds to bear the brunt of the work in your cycle. Obviously you'd still need a test base, but besides a relatively minor dosage (200-250 mg/week) the rest of the "power" in this cycle would come from something else (Anavar, Primobolan, even Turinabol).
Like when I see people doing 500 mg Test cycles, I can't help but ask why they're doing that when they can instead do less Test (300 mg) and stack it with something much less androgenic like Primo and/or Anavar.
Of course this is assuming things like price isn't an issue.
All feedback is appreciated!
Been training for 10+ years now and have probably exhausted 95% of my natty gains so I am doing some preliminary research about enhancement.
My question is, since testosterone has a decent amount of androgenic side effects with a 100:100 anabolic/androgenic ratio, would it not be a smarter idea to rely more on less androgenic compounds to bear the brunt of the work in your cycle. Obviously you'd still need a test base, but besides a relatively minor dosage (200-250 mg/week) the rest of the "power" in this cycle would come from something else (Anavar, Primobolan, even Turinabol).
Like when I see people doing 500 mg Test cycles, I can't help but ask why they're doing that when they can instead do less Test (300 mg) and stack it with something much less androgenic like Primo and/or Anavar.
Of course this is assuming things like price isn't an issue.
All feedback is appreciated!
