New MESO-Rx member ranking system

[Ghoul]

I seem to be getting called a liar once again although I’ve already proven my case on the others. Just a guy who names calls as his defense. Again, very telling about what cloth he’s cut from.

@Spaceman Spiff I’m truly sorry for involving you but can you verify for these fine folks that Ghoul reported you just this week through messaging Millard.

By all means. Post the ENTIRE message.

The one I sent to Spaceman directly.

Let's see this "attempt to have a member banned".

 

[AlexDavis43]

Answer my question Alex. and then I'll answer yours.

No, since you won't answer this genuinely anyway

What is your intention by tagging Millard so frequently? (ref)

 

[Ghoul]

I seem to be getting called a liar once again although I’ve already proven my case on the others. Just a guy who names calls as his defense. Again, very telling about what cloth he’s cut from.

@Spaceman Spiff I’m truly sorry for involving you but can you verify for these fine folks that Ghoul reported you just this week through messaging Millard.

If you're relied on his representation I tried to "have him banned", you're in for real disappointment.

 

[AlexDavis43]

If you're relied on his representation I tried to "have him banned", you're in for real disappointment.

So what is the point by involving Millard?

 

[B Ware]

Let's see this "attempt to have a member banned".

Bro, stfu already. Geez I’ve posted more responding to you today than I have in the entire last month. I have a life and plan to get back to it but you keep throwing that liar word around and I take great offense as I have not told a single one while you repeatedly have. I have no reason to lie. Do I dislike some guy on the internet, sure but I won’t lie to discredit you. I actually am not trying to get you banned either. I could give two shits. I just wish you’d simmer down and worry about your health and quit giving advice all day and night when you are on a downward spiral bud.

To be clear I don’t believe I said you tried to have a member banned. Although what else would it be when you tag Millard to snitch and messaged him to report that Space Spiff was being mean to you when you were actually the aggressor in the thread that he created?

 

[Ghoul]

On this I completely agree. Just block eachother or fucking ignore eachother and that's it. Easy peasy.

I wouldn't ask ghoul help on AAS or brewing stuff but we all can admit he has helped many ppl with BP and other meds issue. Same as @egruberman for example on lipids related issues, he has delved deep into it.

I mean we all have our flaws why do we need to keep bickering between eachother when it's full of retarded new members just waiting to be kicked in the balls? XD

Status means shit, I mean have you seen some of the WKM in this thread? Have you looked at it?

You are giving Ghoul shit when we have some WKM that have contributed zero fucking nothing since day one till the end of time.

This is the sentiment I've expressed repeatedly even as these cocksuckers have tried to run me off Meso, explicitly trying to het me banned repeatedly,

You remember when I told someone to "Drop dead" and they claimed that was a "death threat"?

And here they are again, with lie after lie, leaning on each other to try and find something they can twist into a weapon.

 

[egruberman]

You mention childish behavior. Did you know Ghoul was recently banned because on numerous occasions when he was confronted about something he resorted to insulting and threatening member’s family members.

I am aware of his childish behavior and as stated, he's not exempt from my criticism of the things he's actually posted. He lashes out at folks in ways that represents emotional immaturity. There's plenty of actual content about which to form an opinion without having to resort to my imagination of what his life must be like or his motivation for posting so much.

For me personally, as I’ve stated Meso used to be a very exciting addicting forum.

In what sense? I've only been here for a little over a year, but every "Veteran" that I've encountered has been a blowhard.

Giving advice about everything when without an internet connection he would be the most uneducated guy here.

You've formed an opinion of the guy and are justifying that opinion with speculation about knowledge that he may or may not possess. For one, it's irrelevant. Whatever knowledge he presents can live on its own merits whether it originated in his head or was something from the Internet. It's clear to me that he is absorbing information, cultivating a degree of understanding and then disseminating that information here. Sometimes his understanding fall short, but often he offers information with the necessary degree of qualification. For example, "I am not sure how beneficial it is to filter peptides prior to administration, but it's something that is often done in a clinical setting, so there must be a good reason for it."

That's the beginning of a potentially interesting discourse and an offer for someone to exercise their own reasoning. By contrast, he could write, "I filter my peptides and you're a fool if you do not."

the most active guy here who answers every question is in the poorest health.

Again, speculation on your part and irrelevant as well. Either his answers have value or they don't.

. It’s just sad that he was rewarded for his behavior based on post count.

This is where I struggle to not act childishly, but I'll do my best. Do you really think the algorithm is so simple as that? I am sure that if you employ your powers of reasoning, you can come up with a better explanation.

Regardless, it's still just an algorithm. Outside of automated means, such as likes, or engagement with the content, there's no easy way to evaluate the quality of one's contributions. As stated in this thread already, It's sad that @Type-IIx does not have "Elite" status, but he is not participating nearly as broadly, in spite of the fact that the depth of the content he offers clearly makes him qualified.

He’s litterally been asked by many what he was actually doing outside of QSC’s thread until recently. He also called me a liar for stating he defended QSC’s floaters by stating, they should be filtering gear anyway but yet later he felt the need to clear up why he did so and justify it, which was his admit to quilt btw.

He has contributions in many other threads, there's the GLP-1 thread, the one or two he made on the closure of the de-minimus loophole, many posts outside of the QSC thread on blood pressure management, and so on.

As for defending floaters, I'm pretty sure that's me. I have and I can walk you through the rational conclusion about why they don't matter, which is not something I believe he's ever done.

act of the matter is behavior issues should never be rewarded but I guess it’s the world we live in today. We are now seeing another member really ramp up his post count as well due to all this. That’s my biggest issue.

Certainly, they could try, but I doubt they would have much success. It's clear that he has an obsessive nature and the focus of that is in the safer use of PEDs as well as other health-related topics. That obsession has led to him offering information that benefits others, which is something I'm reminded of daily when it takes me literally a second to draw up my daily AAS dose through a vial spike he tracked down and recommended.

 

[Ghoul]

Bro, stfu already. Geez I’ve posted more responding to you today than I have in the entire last month. I have a life and plan to get back to it but you keep throwing that liar word around and I take great offense as I have not told a single one while you repeatedly have. I have no reason to lie. Do I dislike some guy on the internet, sure but I won’t lie to discredit you. I actually am not trying to get you banned either. I could give two shits. I just wish you’d simmer down and worry about your health and quit giving advice all day and night when you are on a downward spiral bud.

To be clear I don’t believe I said you tried to have a member banned. Although what else would it be when you tag Millard to snitch and messaged him to report that Space Spiff was being mean to you when you were actually the aggressor in the thread that he created?

Let's see it asshole. Let's see where "I tried to get someone banned".

You and your long list of lies, from inducing "harm" to "shilling for a vendor" in Millard's thread, all intended to get me banned, and here you are now projecting that onto me.

 

[AlexDavis43]

Wow: calling people worthless clowns, low IQ losers, cunts, and knuckle draggers all in one post (ref). Courtesy of guess who

 

[B Ware]

I am aware of his childish behavior and as stated, he's not exempt from my criticism of the things he's actually posted. He lashes out at folks in ways that represents emotional immaturity. There's plenty of actual content about which to form an opinion without having to resort to my imagination of what his life must be like or his motivation for posting so much.



In what sense? I've only been here for a little over a year, but every "Veteran" that I've encountered has been a blowhard.



You've formed an opinion of the guy and are justifying that opinion with speculation about knowledge that he may or may not possess. For one, it's irrelevant. Whatever knowledge he presents can live on its own merits whether it originated in his head or was something from the Internet. It's clear to me that he is absorbing information, cultivating a degree of understanding and then disseminating that information here. Sometimes his understanding fall short, but often he offers information with the necessary degree of qualification. For example, "I am not sure how beneficial it is to filter peptides prior to administration, but it's something that is often done in a clinical setting, so there must be a good reason for it."

That's the beginning of a potentially interesting discourse and an offer for someone to exercise their own reasoning. By contrast, he could write, "I filter my peptides and you're a fool if you do not."



Again, speculation on your part and irrelevant as well. Either his answers have value or they don't.



This is where I struggle to not act childishly, but I'll do my best. Do you really think the algorithm is so simple as that? I am sure that if you employ your powers of reasoning, you can come up with a better explanation.

Regardless, it's still just an algorithm. Outside of automated means, such as likes, or engagement with the content, there's no easy way to evaluate the quality of one's contributions. As stated in this thread already, It's sad that @Type-IIx does not have "Elite" status, but he is not participating nearly as broadly, in spite of the fact that the depth of the content he offers clearly makes him qualified.



He has contributions in many other threads, there's the GLP-1 thread, the one or two he made on the closure of the de-minimus loophole, many posts outside of the QSC thread on blood pressure management, and so on.

As for defending floaters, I'm pretty sure that's me. I have and I can walk you through the rational conclusion about why they don't matter, which is not something I believe he's ever done.



Certainly, they could try, but I doubt they would have much success. It's clear that he has an obsessive nature and the focus of that is in the safer use of PEDs as well as other health-related topics. That obsession has led to him offering information that benefits others, which is something I'm reminded of daily when it takes me literally a second to draw up my daily AAS dose through a vial spike he tracked down and recommended.

I can appreciate this level headed post. It really doesn’t sit well with me that I brought up his health and I apologized for doing so. I will say it’s absolutely not speculation and I wouldn’t have brought it up as just a slinging shit at the wall move. I know it’s a lot to ask someone to read through his post history but read through the extensive list of his prescriptions that he has shared about here and there. (There’s actually more but I won’t cross that line) With that said, I’m genuine when I say I would love to see him create a log and for once take feedback, criticism and reach for a better quality of life. I’d be subbed with nothing but positive vibes for the guy.

Sorry for not addressing your entire post but kiddos are tired and cranky and need help being put down. Night guys

 

[AlexDavis43]

Let's see it asshole. Let's see where "I tried to get someone banned".

You and your long list of lies, from inducing "harm" to "shilling for a vendor" in Millard's thread, all intended to get me banned, and here you are now projecting that onto me.

Your hot temper is what got you banned.

Not "harm" or "shilling for a vendor."

Let's see it asshole. Let's see where "I tried to get someone banned".

What is the point of tagging Millard other than trying to get someone banned?

 

[LGOP528]

Are you also aware that Ghoul DMs Millard to snitch on members? He did so just this week.

That is a pretty strong word for a forum based around illegal substances but I think you knew that.

 

[Ghoul]

Wow: calling people worthless clowns, low IQ losers, cunts, and knuckle draggers all in one post (ref). Courtesy of guess who

So?

What is your point Alex? "Name calling" in a mutual fight is now the unforgivable sin? I thought it was "trying to get a member banned", or "Causing harm to members".?

You're sure you're not just, you know, shifting the goal posts endlessly in a quest to accomplish...what exactly?

 

[Ghoul]

Your hot temper is what got you banned.

Not "harm" or "shilling for a vendor."



What is the point of tagging Millard other than trying to get someone banned?

Alex, you're a deeply dishonest man,

This entire thread has been geared to getting me banned based on false accusations, which have TAGGED MILLARD.

I do the same, truthfully pointing out their behavior, and I'm doing something. despicable?

Here's some name calling for you.

Eat shit, you intellectually dishonest, effeminate, 3rd rate intellect.

You've been butthurt since I pointed out it's not exactly "harm reduction" to tell newbies sterile filtering peptides is pointless, The irrationality is inescapable, and your fragile ego will never let you reverse course, so you lash at the source of your disgrace,

 

[AlexDavis43]

So?

What is your point Alex? "Name calling" in a mutual fight is now the unforgivable sin? I thought it was "trying to get a member banned", or "Causing harm to members".?

You're sure you're not just, you know, shifting the goal posts endlessly in a quest to accomplish...what exactly?

I don't really care about the name-calling.

What's the point in tagging Millard if it's not trying to get someone banned? ChatGPT can't help you here?

 

[Ghoul]

I don't really care about the name-calling.

What's the point in tagging Millard if it's not trying to get someone banned? ChatGPT can't help you here?

I don't really care about the name-calling.

What's the point in tagging Millard if it's not trying to get someone banned? ChatGPT can't help you here?

To highlight the behavior that strips the credibility of those advocating to have me banned, Alex.

And while your ChatGPT taunt won't goad me into anything, it represents another in a long line of examples of your campaign of harassment.

As the recipient of the well deserved consequences of "name calling", a violation of forum etiquette, I certainly hope, as @Millard returns to his thread (in which he's been tagged 50+ times), he considers applying the same standard equally to, especially, those who've stepped outside those boundaries repeatedly with forethought, fraud, and enduring malice rather than an isolated outburst.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

I don't really care about the name-calling.

What's the point in tagging Millard if it's not trying to get someone banned? ChatGPT can't help you here?

Yea dude. Stop being dishonest. The guy was never banned for apeshit on these forums lol

 

[BamaCrazy]

Well look at that. Statuses have been removed

 

[readalot]

Well look at that. Statuses have been removed

Praise to be the most Holy, my end game hath been delivered. The Oracle told of this great event.

Persistence, persistence. Remember that.



Keep grinding!!

 

[Stealth500]

Well look at that. Statuses have been removed

welp.

Now people will have to search for status in actual reality. What a concept.
Those that are somebody in the real world couldn't care less. Larpers on suicide watch.