New rHGH testing method

[muscletrain]

Correct!

Maybe some can be seen on this picture as well?
I put the red lines to point to the corresponding peak in each method.

View attachment 141030

Yes that is quite difference I mean nothing but positive comes from this, if a GH producer fights back against this new test because it makes their product "look worse" well its probably because it is worse than they thought. Excited to see the big boys like Opti and TP/Mauve's be sent in. Opti has consistently tested at 98-99% with 0 dimmer and its been a breath of fresh air for generics.

 

[janoshik]

The number of IU's drop as well or just the purity? Im confused a little

The drop in IUs is the same as drop in the purity, relatively speaking.

 

[janoshik]

Yes that is quite difference I mean nothing but positive comes from this, if a GH producer fights back against this new test because it makes their product "look worse" well its probably because it is worse than they thought. Excited to see the big boys like Opti and TP/Mauve's be sent in. Opti has consistently tested at 98-99% with 0 dimmer and its been a breath of fresh air for generics.

I am thinking the same - looking at this as a chance to improve stuff around.

 

[ThyNoah]

@janoshik any new results from this new method yet that you can share with the community, any of the measurable results etc? Just curious if anyone has tested with this.

 

[janoshik]

@janoshik any new results from this new method yet that you can share with the community, any of the measurable results etc? Just curious if anyone has tested with this.

Any report that has been made in 2021 on GH is with this method, except OneQ (which is in their thread, they requested some specific pharma-like method which doesn't even list purity at all, so they could compare with L4T or something).

So I've done 20-30 GH samples this year so far with the new method - some results made it on meso, some didn't.

I don't keep track about who posted it and I obviously can't post results of my clients, but I was able to look up PharmaSource posting his result: Pharmasource EU pharmaceuticals

 

[effiffoff]

Did you publish it anywhere?
It should give you credit in the scientific world- I assume maybe wrongly.

If not, why?

 

[Type-IIx]

I did not know this happened. Stick with the precise measurement that shows potential degradation of reference quality rhGH. It's important to know what people have post-transit! Peoples' perceptions and understandings of what is acceptable and what is not will adapt appropriately. People will have to be reasonable; and where necessary, sources will be incentivized to improve!

 

[janoshik]

Did you publish it anywhere?
It should give you credit in the scientific world- I assume maybe wrongly.

If not, why?

What benefit is there for me? None, only trouble and more of my time spent.

I prefer to spend my time doing things that I like and I don't really like publishing. My time is limited and I'll gladly exchange a little academic fame for more time with my family.