OK, I might need to apologize to OPTI and Bolder

I don't think it's a W&M thing, i think it's a you thing that @Eman is hitting on.

Best test cyp ever bro!
View attachment 109418

that would be amazing coincidence that he (and few other shills) try to hit me the same moment I show that W&M results are questionable.

but the good news is there are only a few of them and more people read it and see that the results are flawed
 
just relax don't you see that Eman is a shill for W&M, defending his business and a few others. people are getting scammed by them. does not matter what proof you show it hits their business and their will keep calling you all names trying to discredit in hope to convince people that their business is good.

If this isn't a pot meet kettle moment, I don't know what is, labmax cocksucker.

If I'm a shill for W&M, I must be the worst shill in existence... I don't think I've ever even posted in their thread.

Let me guess, I was a shill for analyzer also because I told you what I thought of you then too.

Take note, YOU are the common denominator.

that would be amazing coincidence

Are you mentally challenged? Why the fuck would I call you out on something before you posted that something? Not to mention I've told you what a waste of server space you are long before any of the analytical testing even existed on Meso...

Any other theories you have? Go ahead and post them up so I can blow holes through them at my convenience.
 
If this isn't a pot meet kettle moment, I don't know what is, labmax cocksucker.

If I'm a shill for W&M, I must be the worst shill in existence... I don't think I've ever even posted in their thread.

Let me guess, I was a shill for analyzer also because I told you what I thought of you then too.

Take note, YOU are the common denominator.



Are you mentally challenged? Why the fuck would I call you out on something before you posted that something? Not to mention I've told you what a waste of server space you are long before any of the analytical testing even existed on Meso...

Any other theories you have? Go ahead and post them up so I can blow holes through them at my convenience.

did you try to talk to your doctor ?

file.jpg
 
movingiron88 I know that you are W&M shill, you can tell whatever you want but there is nothing you can convince people that the tests are reliable except bunch of other shills like you
 
movingiron88 I know that you are W&M shill, you can tell whatever you want but there is nothing you can convince people that the tests are reliable except bunch of other shills like you
Wouldn't a shill be spouting off about how great something is? I have yet to see that out of MI88 or eman, ever. They are simply shitting on you, based on your actions on meso. You shill for glow sticks, which by the way are garbage. I have test cyp in gso and some in mct. Identical brews except for the carrier. The gso shows test cyp but the mct shows that's its not test cyp. What color glow stick do I need for the mct oil to read test cyp? Or is it the testing product that is bad? Hmmm, but i guess this is just me shilling for w&m. Your products are bunk dude, regardless of what you think about any other testing service anywhere on the planet.
 
Wouldn't a shill be spouting off about how great something is? I have yet to see that out of MI88 or eman, ever. They are simply shitting on you, based on your actions on meso. You shill for glow sticks, which by the way are garbage. I have test cyp in gso and some in mct. Identical brews except for the carrier. The gso shows test cyp but the mct shows that's its not test cyp. What color glow stick do I need for the mct oil to read test cyp? Or is it the testing product that is bad? Hmmm, but i guess this is just me shilling for w&m. Your products are bunk dude, regardless of what you think about any other testing service anywhere on the planet.

let me use a language which maybe the only one you can understand.

what the fuck are you talking about ?

where did you see my banner, advertisement ?

the only thing I did is to convey to people how the test works and how to read it and I will keep doing it when I see people asking

they same like I will get into any discussion which I am feeling comfortable to be in.

and you do not have slightest clue about the subject you are talking about (are you expert ?), you just need to ask any chemist and he will tell that those type of tests have been used long before you have been born and will be always used.

did I try to sell it you ?
 
let me use a language which maybe the only one you can understand.

what the fuck are you talking about ?

where did you see my banner, advertisement ?

the only thing I did is to convey to people how the test works and how to read it and I will keep doing it when I see people asking

they same like I will get into any discussion which I am feeling comfortable to be in.

and you do not have slightest clue about the subject you are talking about (are you expert ?), you just need to ask any chemist and he will tell that those type of tests have been used long before you have been born and will be always used.

did I try to sell it you ?

You’re funny. You post here and in W&M and I don’t think anyone listens to anything you say. I read your posts for the pure entertainment. Keep posting my man. You’re amusing!
 
you only post to discredit other testing agencies and guess what else, talk up labmax : )

Shill

how do you discredit test which gives proper color reaction to only one compound ? you have no clue what you are talking about.

on other hand maybe you can answer I could not get from W&M

what does the third curve mean ? and why is the resolution is different you cannot read anything on the graph, this is not what is coming out unless you put it together in photo editor.


fake3.jpg
 
how do you discredit test which gives proper color reaction to only one compound
maybe I should have dropped a few swear words in the post for you to follow along. For someone that likes to tell people they are dumb and not on your level you seem to miss the basics. Let me quote the post and you can read it, again.

The gso shows test cyp but the mct shows that's its not test cyp

What the post says is your product doesn't work correctly based on carrier being used. It's not suitable for testing because it can not detect a compound based on different carriers. So I ask you, why does it not work correctly based on the carrier? You give me a suitable answer based on the facts that I've told you and I'll tell you what the answer to this is.

what does the third curve mean ? and why is the resolution is different you cannot read anything on the graph, this is not what is coming out unless you put it together in photo editor

Should I be more aggressive with my next reply? You seem to respond better to aggression and turmoil.

Shill.
 
on other hand maybe you can answer I could not get from W&M
and please answer this. Why do you keep asking someone questions that they've articulated to you that they can't answer, about half a dozen times? Are you being obtuse by design or do you think that you're proving a point or what? I know you've read the same question before because you reply to it but yet you continue to ask. Maybe you're the one that doesnt get it?
 
Last edited:
What the post says is your product doesn't work correctly based on carrier being used. It's not suitable for testing because it can not detect a compound based on different carriers. So I ask you, why does it not work correctly based on the carrier? You give me a suitable answer based on the facts that I've told you and I'll tell you what the answer to this is.

where did you get your education that you do not understand simple things ?

those type of tests give fluorescence in presence of UV light, each test is made of different chemicals, they can be used for variety of substances and they are used in labs around the world. different test different substances. not only steroids

in this case you get fluorescence in presence of steroids. when you look at the light through a different optical filters it will look different.

in this case each oil works as different filter absorbing/ dispersing the light. this is why it looks different for different oils
 
where did you get your education that you do not understand simple things ?

those type of tests give fluorescence in presence of UV light, each test is made of different chemicals, they can be used for variety of substances and they are used in labs around the world. different test different substances. not only steroids

in this case you get fluorescence in presence of steroids. when you look at the light through a different optical filters it will look different.

in this case each oil works as different filter absorbing/ dispersing the light. this is why it looks different for different oils
So, if I'm understanding you correctly (humor me here for a minute), labmax will not show the presence of test cyp in mct but will show it in gso? Where does one obtain these optical filters to differentiate? You mean the flashlight? Are there different flashlights for different carriers? Please excuse me if I missed the assortment of lights for different carriers being used, didn't see them being advertised or talked about. Can you expand on these filters that labmax is offering if its more than just the flashlight? I'd rather be in the knowledgeable group, or are you referencing something that isn't available to a regular person through labmax?

So, imo, it's unreliable for of testing based on the idea that it's marketed as an all inclusive test for finished oils, raws, capsules or tablets. Does it say that test cyp will not be detected when mct is used and you dont have the special filter? I can't find that in any labmax literature. Can you?

So, something that is used for so many things (including testing other than steroids), has an error rate to it. Seems plausible. Do we now tear down regent testing as a viable means of identification because it has a hard time with different carriers? Or do we view this test as an outlier and anticipate other testing to be ok? Do we try to find out what went wrong and denigrate all regent testing in the process?

Accusing labmax of being fraudulent and scamming seems like a stretch to me if the testing process is solid. In your opinion, you seem to think it is a solid form of identification but from real world experience it comes up short, often.

Think about what you say and how you treat your peers. You have as many holes in your product as anyone else. You should be looking to improve the culture and expand the group's collective skill set. You're doing the opposite.

Dont reply, I dont care. my points been made much like your point the w&m doesnt know how to test gh has been made. But if you'd like we can sit here all day and talk shit. You seem to like that approach but my God you're bad at it.
 
So, if I'm understanding you correctly (humor me here for a minute), labmax will not show the presence of test cyp in mct but will show it in gso?

sorry I am tired talking to you today, why do not you read the instruction page and I am sure they also must be sending instruction with the test.

I just went there and watch the vimeo video they have, it shines nice under uv for both oils

and what are you talking about or get your information when you have it right here

Testosterone cypionate test kit, anabolic steroid test kit
 
sorry I am tired talking to you today, why do not you read the instruction page and I am sure they also must be sending instruction with the test.

I just went there and watch the vimeo video they have, it shines nice under uv for both oils

and what are you talking about or get your information when you have it right here

Testosterone cypionate test kit, anabolic steroid test kit
Oh dude, don't side step the questions. Not a good look. Some might brand you a hypocrite for not addressing my very direct and legitimate questions (based on your post quoted here)
when you look at the light through a different optical filters it will look different.
. The hypocrisy would be you needling w&m about them not answering a question of yours.

Furthermore I've come to conclude that you weren't being obtuse. I think that you're just stuck in your little niche and have zero relevance outside of your lane. So on that premise you weren't being obtuse, you were being a dick that can't see more than what's inside of his little box that he lives in. Much like a young teenager actually.

My point wasn't for you to dig up a hyperlink to instructions but you knew that. Your glowsticks tests don't always work, but you knew that too. Probably the reason you didn't directly answer me.

Like I said:
Think about what you say and how you treat your
Grow up "scientist"
 
go and take some basic fucking chemistry course
What does that have to do with the regent testing not being consistent? Please stay on topic. Would you agree that while human error can happen with analytical testing it can also happen during the manufacturing and packaging of things like regent testing kits? While you avoid admitting any type of culpability when touting regent testing you spearhead the hopeful demise of a peer. Classless.
 
Back
Top