MESO-Rx Sponsor Opti-Tropin HGH - Canadian Domestic

This is great info never seen this before, so even at that % that is still very, very low dimmer. But it seems that most people with sides *DO* post the cheaper dimmer content ones be that what it is. Honestly I'm sure both products are great but I will always opt for the 100-120iu 0 dimmer kits.
Yes, I oft state that dimer itself is not the issue, but higher dimer is associated with more sides because of other stuff that tends to be there, when dimer is higher. At least that's my understanding of the issue.

Honestly, the biggest reason for worry, if there is not a long track of issues already, is when dimer content suddenly rises between batches.
 
This is great info never seen this before, so even at that % that is still very, very low dimmer. But it seems that most people with sides *DO* post the cheaper dimmer content ones be that what it is. Honestly I'm sure both products are great but I will always opt for the 100-120iu 0 dimmer kits.

That is the decision I’m trying to make as well. Do I want the 100iu kit with 0 dimer or the 280iu kit with 0.5% dimer... how significant is that 0.5% when compared to a comparable GH with no dimer? Might er on the side of caution and go with the 100iu kits to skip any dimer

@janoshik thanks for your answer. What is the realistic margin of error on these tests? Can the 100iu kits possibly come back as no dimer because of the lower amount of GH being tested, and hence a lower amount of dimer? If you combined 2.8 of the 100iu vials (so there’s the same amount of GH as a vial from the 280iu kits) could it possibly come up with a similar dimer content since more quantity of GH is being tested and more dimer may be found? Hope the question makes sense. Thanks.
 
That is the decision I’m trying to make as well. Do I want the 100iu kit with 0 dimer or the 280iu kit with 0.5% dimer... how significant is that 0.5% when compared to a comparable GH with no dimer? Might er on the side of caution and go with the 100iu kits to skip any dimer

@janoshik thanks for your answer. What is the realistic margin of error on these tests? Can the 100iu kits possibly come back as no dimer because of the lower amount of GH being tested, and hence a lower amount of dimer? If you combined 2.8 of the 100iu vials (so there’s the same amount of GH as a vial from the 280iu kits) could it possibly come up with a similar dimer content since more quantity of GH is being tested and more dimer may be found? Hope the question makes sense. Thanks.
I actually have an issue with dimer testing setup that I use that it is TOO sensitive. If I wanted, I could casually detect it down to 0.0000001%, which however I don't find useful and worth the additional work.

I can't tell what the detection limit is right now, as I'm not in the lab, but I feel anything under 0.005% can be safely ignored and I feel that is about the current detection limit as well.

Hope that, even though indirect, this answer is sufficient.
 
Right now I can not say much for quality communication was amazing got fast email responses felt like I was texting the rep I will make a post about how I like their products a little bit later on thinking about running Gh for a full year!
 
You don’t think opti isn’t putting out the best GH in Canada? Lol
I Never said that, I’m actually a very happy customer, however, if you actually understood the point of pushing for “better” testing then you would understand that the more sensitive testing forces us to either accept sub par hgh knowing it could potentially be better, or better yet, the market to produce better HGH.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top