Ghoul
Member
Is there a point that you'd just go ahead and freeze? Or would that be harmful for hgh?
If it was going to be over A year. But not if it's a frost free freezer under any circumstances.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is there a point that you'd just go ahead and freeze? Or would that be harmful for hgh?
Ok I appreciate the info! I bought enough to use within a yr so I should be good. I'm sure I've seen info on all this before but just now about to start hgh for the first time so I wasn't as concerned before about it.If it was going to be over A year. But not if it's a frost free freezer under any circumstances.
I remember a post you made about cryo/deep freezers used by pharma, the ones that go down to -80 (can't recall if that's Celsius or Fahrenheit) and that the reason they're necessary is that while plain water freezers at 0°/32°, the small amounts of moisture possible left over after the lyophilization process are obviously mixed with whatever is in the powder, changing (lowering) the freezing temp the same way salt and other chemicals used to de-ice roadways do. This means that if that freezing threshold is somewhere within the small fluctuations of your freezers temps (even defrost-free freezers fluctuate a little) you're essentially thawing and freezing the contents over and over, and possibly breaking down/destroying the peptide or GH. Am I remembering any of that post correctly?If it was going to be over A year. But not if it's a frost free freezer under any circumstances.
Larger volume as in Dose? Or Bac water with the dose? Like 2mg but .5/.75ml bacThat helps because it alters the pharmacokinetics, ie, speed of absorption.
Slower means lower blood level peak. Peaks usually correlate with sides.
Another way to slow absorption is with larger volume. .5ml per dose matches what pharma uses.
Larger volume as in Dose? Or Bac water with the dose? Like 2mg but .5/.75ml bac
Check your spam. I put an order in yesterday and immediately got a confirmation after bitcoin landed. Woke up this morning and informed delivery already shows a label was created. Placed many orders and it's always been the same, usually get package inside a week.Put in an order for 4x blue tops and 4x BAC, have received no confirmation email after ordering but will give it a bit. Will update if email or package received.
Most people don't understand how BTC transactions/exchanges work let alone how they are integrated into ecomm platforms. EComm platforms typically do not send out the order receipt email until the BTC transaction has received between 1-3 confirmations on the blockchain. This process is not immediate even if sent out of your personal wallet. If you are sending directly out of an exchange like coinbase, they will often batch transactions which results in additional delays in broadcasting transactions to be confirmed on the blockchain.Put in an order for 4x blue tops and 4x BAC, have received no confirmation email after ordering but will give it a bit. Will update if email or package received.
Yup, sometimes my packs move immediately, sometimes it’s a week before anything. Just be patient, opti seems to always come through.First time ordering from Opti, so forgive me if this process is normal.
I placed an order on Saturday 8/2 and received confirmation on Sunday 8/3. On Monday morning 8/4 I was notified through usps that a shipping label had been created and usps is waiting to receive the package. Fast forward a few days to today 8/7 and there has been zero movement. usps still shows shipping label created but awaiting package. Is this normal/typical?
never seen 60iu vials offered before. IMO the higher you go on IU/vial, the harder it becomes to maintain consistent doses across the batch... that is, a 10% variance in a batch of 10IU vials means +/- 1IU per vial, which isn't a big deal. on the other hand, a 10% variance on a batch of 60IU vials means +/- 6IU per vial, which can swing things a bit more.Looking forward to these green tops to drop. I have enough gh for 6ish months, but 60iu vials?? Has anyone seen anything like that before?
Would make sense considering you see no other vendors doing it. The 3 vials he tested look to be fairly accurate though at ~62iu, ~62iu, and ~59iu. I imagine the convenience alone if using 6+ per day will make that amount of variance worth it. Interested in how easy it reconstitutes as well.never seen 60iu vials offered before. IMO the higher you go on IU/vial, the harder it becomes to maintain consistent doses across the batch... that is, a 10% variance in a batch of 10IU vials means +/- 1IU per vial, which isn't a big deal. on the other hand, a 10% variance on a batch of 60IU vials means +/- 6IU per vial, which can swing things a bit more.
sure it's great to have less vials of GH in the fridge, or if you're using 60IU vials @ 3IU/day or something and not have to recon every week or whatever... but i have a feeling that quality control just gets more difficult overall.
Personally, I wouldn't want reconstituted GH sitting in the fridge for more than a week, 10 days max. For people taking low doses, the 60's really wouldn't make a lot of sense. I'm at 12iu/day currently, so these would be perfect for me in that they'd be exactly 5 doses... assuming they test at 60iu.never seen 60iu vials offered before. IMO the higher you go on IU/vial, the harder it becomes to maintain consistent doses across the batch... that is, a 10% variance in a batch of 10IU vials means +/- 1IU per vial, which isn't a big deal. on the other hand, a 10% variance on a batch of 60IU vials means +/- 6IU per vial, which can swing things a bit more.
sure it's great to have less vials of GH in the fridge, or if you're using 60IU vials @ 3IU/day or something and not have to recon every week or whatever... but i have a feeling that quality control just gets more difficult overall.
10 days max? Iv seen up to a month is generally okay?Personally, I wouldn't want reconstituted GH sitting in the fridge for more than a week, 10 days max. For people taking low doses, the 60's really wouldn't make a lot of sense. I'm at 12iu/day currently, so these would be perfect for me in that they'd be exactly 5 doses... assuming they test at 60iu.
Yeah, I have heard a month as well, but I've also heard a week, and sometimes I see ten days thrown around. I don't know the hard science, which is why I qualified what I said with "personally" as I didn't want to make it sound like I was making a definitively factual statement, but rather stating my preference. While not a fortune any more, GH is still one of the more expensive things I take, especially when you take frequency (daily) and time frame (indefinite use) into account, so I'm being more cautious as I don't want to risk wasting a portion of that money by injected degraded or inert GH.10 days max? Iv seen up to a month is generally okay?
