Man just send it off for testing. Don’t need to go back and forth without real proof.
No worries, mate — I will definitely send it for testing, I’m not talking nonsense.
I’m waiting for the reseller’s response regarding what medium I should send it in and how to document everything properly so the test will be credible.
Saying that I’m making claims without evidence is only partially true, because although I don’t have a Jánoshik test YET, I do have blood tests for everything, in chronological order, exactly as I described.
I wanted to discuss this normally here, but then let’s go into the details as well.
By that logic, the Jánoshik tests posted here so far cannot really be considered solid evidence either, because:
The batch number hasn’t changed for 1–2 years.
There was only one instance of a potency difference between two tests, possibly when the oil became very dark.
No one has personally tested the Unique Test E oil themselves, so there has been no blind test — at least none uploaded here. I read the entire forum.
I found only one blood test over the past 3 years, among the very first posts, that could maybe be considered acceptable.
Madsen, although not the most reliable, does perform many tests. At the beginning of the year, Unique tested well with them — but the recently tested vials did not.
Interesting, isn’t it.
Honestly, there’s no real point arguing about this, because falsifying a test doesn’t require much effort. The manufacturer sends 1–2 vials with perfect active ingredient content, the reseller sends those for testing, while the rest of the vials may or may not contain anything.
Anyway, I’m waiting for the response, and I’ll report back with the results at the beginning of January.
