MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Penis Size/Shape
- Thread starter Michael Scally MD
- Start date
Re: Penis Size Influences Male Attractiveness
I strained mine once
attempting the TOP PIN MOVE for too long. You know, the one where you toss her legs straight up in the air and put her KNEES in her face and SIT ON HER LIKE SHE's A CHAIR... Problem was - I was about 7 and a quail deep in her arse and she BUCKED ME....! LOL
Its actually a common and really the only surgical procedure to add length, SHORT OF SOME REALLY INVASIVE SURGERY. And published anywhere the talk about it.
I strained mine once
attempting the TOP PIN MOVE for too long. You know, the one where you toss her legs straight up in the air and put her KNEES in her face and SIT ON HER LIKE SHE's A CHAIR... Problem was - I was about 7 and a quail deep in her arse and she BUCKED ME....! LOLIts actually a common and really the only surgical procedure to add length, SHORT OF SOME REALLY INVASIVE SURGERY. And published anywhere the talk about it.
Erect Penile Length and Circumference Dimensions - United States
Herbenick D, Reece M, Schick V, Sanders SA. Erect Penile Length and Circumference Dimensions of 1,661 Sexually Active Men in the United States. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. Erect Penile Length and Circumference Dimensions of 1,661 Sexually Active Men in the United States - Herbenick - 2013 - The Journal of Sexual Medicine - Wiley Online Library
Introduction - Penile size continues to receive popular and empirical attention. Little is known about the process of self-measurement and whether the behaviors a man engages in to become erect for self-measurement are associated with his erect penile dimensions.
Aims The article aims to assess men's erect penile dimensions in a study in which the men would presumably be motivated to report accurate information about their penis size; and to explore associations between men's erect penile dimensions, their method of measurement, and their demographics.
Methods - Data are from an Internet-based baseline phase of a large prospective daily diary study that compared men's use of a standard-sized condom to men's use of a condom sized to fit their erect penis.
Main Outcome Measures - The main outcomes are participant characteristics, activities engaged in during self-measurement process, and self-reported erect penile length and circumference.
Results - For this sample of 1,661 men, the mean erect penile length was 14.15?cm (SD?=?2.66; range?=?4 to 26?cm), and the mean erect penile circumference was 12.23?cm (SD?=?2.23; range?=?3 to 19). Participant characteristics were not associated with measured length or circumference. Most men measured their penis while alone, using hand stimulation to become erect.
Conclusions - In this sample of men who measured their erect penile length and circumference for the purposes of receiving a condom sized to fit their erect penis, we found a mean erect penile length of 14.15?cm and a mean erect penile circumference of 12.23?cm. The self-reported erect penile dimensions in this study are consistent with other penile dimension research. Also, findings suggest that mode of getting an erection may influence erect penile dimensions. Additionally, how a man becomes erect for self-measurement may be associated with his erect penile length and/or circumference.
Herbenick D, Reece M, Schick V, Sanders SA. Erect Penile Length and Circumference Dimensions of 1,661 Sexually Active Men in the United States. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. Erect Penile Length and Circumference Dimensions of 1,661 Sexually Active Men in the United States - Herbenick - 2013 - The Journal of Sexual Medicine - Wiley Online Library
Introduction - Penile size continues to receive popular and empirical attention. Little is known about the process of self-measurement and whether the behaviors a man engages in to become erect for self-measurement are associated with his erect penile dimensions.
Aims The article aims to assess men's erect penile dimensions in a study in which the men would presumably be motivated to report accurate information about their penis size; and to explore associations between men's erect penile dimensions, their method of measurement, and their demographics.
Methods - Data are from an Internet-based baseline phase of a large prospective daily diary study that compared men's use of a standard-sized condom to men's use of a condom sized to fit their erect penis.
Main Outcome Measures - The main outcomes are participant characteristics, activities engaged in during self-measurement process, and self-reported erect penile length and circumference.
Results - For this sample of 1,661 men, the mean erect penile length was 14.15?cm (SD?=?2.66; range?=?4 to 26?cm), and the mean erect penile circumference was 12.23?cm (SD?=?2.23; range?=?3 to 19). Participant characteristics were not associated with measured length or circumference. Most men measured their penis while alone, using hand stimulation to become erect.
Conclusions - In this sample of men who measured their erect penile length and circumference for the purposes of receiving a condom sized to fit their erect penis, we found a mean erect penile length of 14.15?cm and a mean erect penile circumference of 12.23?cm. The self-reported erect penile dimensions in this study are consistent with other penile dimension research. Also, findings suggest that mode of getting an erection may influence erect penile dimensions. Additionally, how a man becomes erect for self-measurement may be associated with his erect penile length and/or circumference.
Mike Oxbig
New Member
Re: Erect Penile Length and Circumference Dimensions - United States
I'm sure the Asians in the country are skewing the results.
I'm sure the Asians in the country are skewing the results.
DieYoungStrong
New Member
Re: Erect Penile Length and Circumference Dimensions - United States
I had a friend in high school, appropriately nicknamed smoke stack. Played lacrosse with him so we were in a locker room together a lot. He went on the become a druggie and so some low budget porn. If you ever saw the size of someone who does porn in person, it ain't even right. Dude had to wear tighty whiteys to keep his shit in check. Looked like someone grafted a forearm between his legs.
In real life before he staryed shooting dope, he always said he had trouble keeping girls because they didnt like it. He ripped them to shreds. He did like that they generally shrieked when he dropped his drawers.
I'm happy with my 2" pudd. Sorry for screwing the averages. It's ok though because I have an ass like a jack rabbit and girth like a tuna can. I don't hit the back, but I beat the shit out of the sides
I had a friend in high school, appropriately nicknamed smoke stack. Played lacrosse with him so we were in a locker room together a lot. He went on the become a druggie and so some low budget porn. If you ever saw the size of someone who does porn in person, it ain't even right. Dude had to wear tighty whiteys to keep his shit in check. Looked like someone grafted a forearm between his legs.
In real life before he staryed shooting dope, he always said he had trouble keeping girls because they didnt like it. He ripped them to shreds. He did like that they generally shrieked when he dropped his drawers.
I'm happy with my 2" pudd. Sorry for screwing the averages. It's ok though because I have an ass like a jack rabbit and girth like a tuna can. I don't hit the back, but I beat the shit out of the sides
Veale D, Eshkevari E, Read J, et al. Beliefs about Penis Size: Validation of a Scale for Men Ashamed about Their Penis Size. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. Beliefs about Penis Size: Validation of a Scale for Men Ashamed about Their Penis Size - Veale - 2013 - The Journal of Sexual Medicine - Wiley Online Library
Introduction No measures are available for understanding beliefs in men who experience shame about the perceived size of their penis. Such a measure might be helpful for treatment planning, and measuring outcome after any psychological or physical intervention.
Aim Our aim was to validate a newly developed measure called the Beliefs about Penis Size Scale (BAPS).
Method One hundred seventy-three male participants completed a new questionnaire consisting of 18 items to be validated and developed into the BAPS, as well as various other standardized measures. A urologist also measured actual penis size.
Main Outcome Measures The BAPS was validated against six psychosexual self-report questionnaires as well as penile size measurements.
Results Exploratory factor analysis reduced the number of items in the BAPS from 18 to 10, which was best explained by one factor. The 10-item BAPS had good internal consistency and correlated significantly with measures of depression, anxiety, body image quality of life, social anxiety, erectile function, overall satisfaction, and the importance attached to penis size. The BAPS was not found to correlate with actual penis size. It was able to discriminate between those who had concerns or were dissatisfied about their penis size and those who were not.
Conclusions This is the first study to develop a scale for measurement of beliefs about penis size. It may be used as part of an assessment for men who experience shame about the perceived size of their penis and as an outcome measure after treatment. The BAPS measures various manifestations of masculinity and shame about their perceived penis size including internal self-evaluative beliefs; negative evaluation by others; anticipated consequences of a perceived small penis, and extreme self-consciousness.
Introduction No measures are available for understanding beliefs in men who experience shame about the perceived size of their penis. Such a measure might be helpful for treatment planning, and measuring outcome after any psychological or physical intervention.
Aim Our aim was to validate a newly developed measure called the Beliefs about Penis Size Scale (BAPS).
Method One hundred seventy-three male participants completed a new questionnaire consisting of 18 items to be validated and developed into the BAPS, as well as various other standardized measures. A urologist also measured actual penis size.
Main Outcome Measures The BAPS was validated against six psychosexual self-report questionnaires as well as penile size measurements.
Results Exploratory factor analysis reduced the number of items in the BAPS from 18 to 10, which was best explained by one factor. The 10-item BAPS had good internal consistency and correlated significantly with measures of depression, anxiety, body image quality of life, social anxiety, erectile function, overall satisfaction, and the importance attached to penis size. The BAPS was not found to correlate with actual penis size. It was able to discriminate between those who had concerns or were dissatisfied about their penis size and those who were not.
Conclusions This is the first study to develop a scale for measurement of beliefs about penis size. It may be used as part of an assessment for men who experience shame about the perceived size of their penis and as an outcome measure after treatment. The BAPS measures various manifestations of masculinity and shame about their perceived penis size including internal self-evaluative beliefs; negative evaluation by others; anticipated consequences of a perceived small penis, and extreme self-consciousness.
Sharpman27
New Member
Haha guys asked to measure their own penis. That is real science my friend. Show us studies of men being measured by doctors, then you will a true average size.
Embrace your small penis, men: Everyone else is lying anyway!
Only one man in 100 reaches beyond the 5-to-7-inch average. Why are men lying, and why do women expect more?
Embrace your small penis, men: Everyone else is lying anyway! - Salon.com
Only one man in 100 reaches beyond the 5-to-7-inch average. Why are men lying, and why do women expect more?
Embrace your small penis, men: Everyone else is lying anyway! - Salon.com
foreveryoung
New Member
what is the correct way to measure, above the top of the penis, pressing tightly on the skin of the abdomen so you can feel the pressure of the bone on the ruler, or just very lightly approaching the skin with no depression of the skin in front of the bone?
"All I know, that when I get an erection I black out."
"women in love are apt to see it as larger--but post break up remember it smaller."
"women in love are apt to see it as larger--but post break up remember it smaller."
Really, I think they now need to do a study on how WAIST SIZE Correlates IN CONJUNCTION with PENIS SIZE, as I am SURE Skinny waisted Bastards (unlike myself) who can really get up between a girls thighs and work their clitoris over with good access have a DEFINITE Advantage. But with STATISTICALLY CURVING RESULTS..
With that said, we MUST Assume that LENGTH THEN BECOMES A DETRIMENT as Compared to GIRTH. Cause to work over a girl's clit with your pubic bone REQUIRES Full Depth Entry. ALL THAT SAID - If ya got a Skinny waist, about 5-7" length (depending on the vagina), THEN MORE GIRTH MUST = MORE FUN.
So then GIRTH is the ONLY FACTOR which does not negate itself, or have a diminishing return with increase.
The matrix appearing something like this (as far as physical and not perceived female LIKES). So imagine you are designing the "Iron Byron of Male Porn Stars"...
Principle #1 - Hip Size - Smaller Equates to Better Always within ANY real human anatomy.
Principle #2 - Girth - Always Bigger is better (Don't believe the lying money grubbers!). They'll get it in there sooner or later..
Principle #3 - LENGTH - This is the REAL ONLY VARIABLE WHICH has SO MANY VARIABLES That apply in real life Application.!!
(a) Length. Regardless of all other factors. Its GOT to be long enough to get in in there.
(b) Longer making up for guys that aren't thin-waisted enough to get in there and work that bean with the "man-bush".
(c) Longer Adding extra "thrill-power" to potentially make up for less girth (as psychological "perceived size factor")
(d) BUT Longer being TOO long, if one IS "thin waisted" enough to up in there good, as then TOO LONG can become an issue..
(e) Longer as "value added" for IF ya JUST CAN'T DANCE... AND for "Long Distance Positions"(Doggie Style, etc..). Personally, I like to "reach out and grab em" from across the room
[)]
So the TRUTH Appearing to BE that there are THREE (3) Factors with regard to EFFECTIVE PENIS SIZE. Those factors being Length, Girth, and Hip Size. Narrower hips ALWAYS Gain better access. There appear to be NO NEGATIVES associated with this in ANY Context. A Fatter Cock is ALWAYs going to provide more Punch and Fun as the woman can expand to get it eventually. Length is NOT ALWAYS better and can be an incumbrance to AT LEAST ONE of the above factors (Waist size, and Girth), whereas NEITHER of the above factors can not negatively affect a shortcoming in LENGTH.
So there ya have it. The only TRULY DYNAMICALLY RELATIVE variable with PENIS SIZE as RELATES TO sex is LENGTH. Smaller hips are always better for sex. Fatter cocks are always better for sex. But TOO LONG can negative the VALUE of NARROW HIPS. With consideration that MOST WOMEN Climax from external Clitoral Stimulation - LENGTH is the ONLY FACTOR which can be "Too Much"..
Proof - The guy with the fat cock who ALSO has a LONG Cock AND Narrow HIPS can't make her cum where the guy with all the same features to ANY "Max Positive" with regard to that principle CAN, if Just the right length....
THEREFORE - Length is the LEAST "Valuable" of the ABOVE THREE FACTORS...
Too much time indeed...[)]
With that said, we MUST Assume that LENGTH THEN BECOMES A DETRIMENT as Compared to GIRTH. Cause to work over a girl's clit with your pubic bone REQUIRES Full Depth Entry. ALL THAT SAID - If ya got a Skinny waist, about 5-7" length (depending on the vagina), THEN MORE GIRTH MUST = MORE FUN.
So then GIRTH is the ONLY FACTOR which does not negate itself, or have a diminishing return with increase.
The matrix appearing something like this (as far as physical and not perceived female LIKES). So imagine you are designing the "Iron Byron of Male Porn Stars"...
Principle #1 - Hip Size - Smaller Equates to Better Always within ANY real human anatomy.
Principle #2 - Girth - Always Bigger is better (Don't believe the lying money grubbers!). They'll get it in there sooner or later..
Principle #3 - LENGTH - This is the REAL ONLY VARIABLE WHICH has SO MANY VARIABLES That apply in real life Application.!!
(a) Length. Regardless of all other factors. Its GOT to be long enough to get in in there.
(b) Longer making up for guys that aren't thin-waisted enough to get in there and work that bean with the "man-bush".
(c) Longer Adding extra "thrill-power" to potentially make up for less girth (as psychological "perceived size factor")
(d) BUT Longer being TOO long, if one IS "thin waisted" enough to up in there good, as then TOO LONG can become an issue..
(e) Longer as "value added" for IF ya JUST CAN'T DANCE...
AND for "Long Distance Positions"(Doggie Style, etc..). Personally, I like to "reach out and grab em" from across the room[)]So the TRUTH Appearing to BE that there are THREE (3) Factors with regard to EFFECTIVE PENIS SIZE. Those factors being Length, Girth, and Hip Size. Narrower hips ALWAYS Gain better access. There appear to be NO NEGATIVES associated with this in ANY Context. A Fatter Cock is ALWAYs going to provide more Punch and Fun as the woman can expand to get it eventually. Length is NOT ALWAYS better and can be an incumbrance to AT LEAST ONE of the above factors (Waist size, and Girth), whereas NEITHER of the above factors can not negatively affect a shortcoming in LENGTH.
So there ya have it. The only TRULY DYNAMICALLY RELATIVE variable with PENIS SIZE as RELATES TO sex is LENGTH. Smaller hips are always better for sex. Fatter cocks are always better for sex. But TOO LONG can negative the VALUE of NARROW HIPS. With consideration that MOST WOMEN Climax from external Clitoral Stimulation - LENGTH is the ONLY FACTOR which can be "Too Much"..
Proof - The guy with the fat cock who ALSO has a LONG Cock AND Narrow HIPS can't make her cum where the guy with all the same features to ANY "Max Positive" with regard to that principle CAN, if Just the right length....
THEREFORE - Length is the LEAST "Valuable" of the ABOVE THREE FACTORS...
Too much time indeed...[
)]because sperm competition has been so important evolutionary speaking it seems to me that penis length/size might be related to the extent of sperm competition. Selection would favor bigger cocks that can deliver a large ejaculate in situations where females are more promiscuous.
chimps are promiscuous and have relatively large penises and huge ejaculates
gorillas have small cocks (relative to body size) and small ejaculates.
2 ways to pass on genes
shoot a big load deep in as many different females as possible = chimps where selection favors big cocks and large ejaculates
beat the shit out of all other males, guard your females and impregnate her when you want. gorillas -- here selection favors big muscular bodies-- don't need a big cock or a large ejaculate since no other males are fucking your mate!
chimps are promiscuous and have relatively large penises and huge ejaculates
gorillas have small cocks (relative to body size) and small ejaculates.
2 ways to pass on genes
shoot a big load deep in as many different females as possible = chimps where selection favors big cocks and large ejaculates
beat the shit out of all other males, guard your females and impregnate her when you want. gorillas -- here selection favors big muscular bodies-- don't need a big cock or a large ejaculate since no other males are fucking your mate!
DieYoungStrong
New Member
Penile Representations in Ancient Greek Art
Ancient Greek pottery and sculpture demonstrates genitals of several sizes depending much on the identity of the depicted person. Phallus in artistic representation is connected much with gods of fertility, such as the goat-footed god of forests Pan and the dwarfish god Priapus.
They both are imaged with supersized genitalia and usually ithyphallic, because the phallus is considered as symbol of abundance. In several agricultural ceremonies to honor them, people bear or wear artificial phalli, for good luck and wealth and healthy animals.
On the other hand, the cult of the god Dionysus combines orgiastic rituals with Maenads and Nymphs and wine culture accompanied by the ithyphallic goat-footed and nailed figures with sexual super-activity, called Satyrs and Sileni.
Phallic worship centered on all these gods: Pan, Priapus, and the Dionysian cult. The representation of a supernatural phallus remained a permanent feature in all the fertility festive manifestations.
Furthermore, the exaggerated size of an erected male organ was strongly believed to bring virility, fertility and good luck, as a symbol of the regenerating power of Nature. In urban centers, like ancient Athens, the worship of the god Hermes was expressed with columns at the main streets bearing the god’s head on the top and an ithyphallus on the base.
The artistic evidence implies that over-large genitals were considered aesthetically unpleasing by the Greeks and Romans. The ideal type of male beauty, epitomized in classical sculpture, normally depicts genitals of somewhat less than average size.
Consequently, the exaggerated genitals of Priapus made him seem ugly and grotesque figure, though benevolent. The small penises shown on ordinary mortals may have been no more than a convention, to distinguish them from fertility figures, such as Pan, Satyrs and Priapus. It also had been pointed out that many of these images belong to athletes during or immediately after hard exercise with the penis shrunk and the testicles hoist high.
Rempelakos L, Tsiamis C, Poulakou-Rebelakou E. Penile representations in ancient Greek art. Arch Esp Urol 2013;66(10):911-6. Archivos Espa
OBJECTIVES: The presentation of the cult of phallus in ancient Greece and the artistic appearance of the phenomenon on vase figures and statues, as indicative of the significant role of the male genitalia in all fertility ceremonies.
METHODS: The examination of a great number of penile representations from the ancient Greek pottery and sculpture and the review of the ancient theater plays (satiric dramas and comedies ).
RESULTS: Phallus in artistic representation is connected either with gods of fertility, such as the goat-footed and horned Pan or the ugly dwarf Priapus or the semi-animal nailed figures Satyrs, devotees of the god Dionysus accompanying him in all ritual orgiastic celebrations. Phallus also symbolizes good luck, health and sexuality: people bear or wear artificial phalli exactly like the actors as part of their costume or carry huge penises during the festive ritual processions.
On the contrary, the Olympic gods or the ordinary mortals are not imaged ithyphallic; the ideal type of male beauty epitomized in classical sculpture, normally depicts genitals of average or less than average size. It is noteworthy that many of these images belong to athletes during or immediately after hard exercise with the penis shrunk. The normal size genitalia may have been simply a convention to distinguish normal people from the gods of sexuality and fertility, protectors of the reproductive process of Nature.
CONCLUSIONS: The representation of the over-sized and erected genitalia on vase figures or statues of ancient Greek art is related to fertility gods such as Priapus, Pan and Satyrs and there is strong evidence that imagination and legend were replacing the scientific achievements in the field of erectile function for many centuries.
Ancient Greek pottery and sculpture demonstrates genitals of several sizes depending much on the identity of the depicted person. Phallus in artistic representation is connected much with gods of fertility, such as the goat-footed god of forests Pan and the dwarfish god Priapus.
They both are imaged with supersized genitalia and usually ithyphallic, because the phallus is considered as symbol of abundance. In several agricultural ceremonies to honor them, people bear or wear artificial phalli, for good luck and wealth and healthy animals.
On the other hand, the cult of the god Dionysus combines orgiastic rituals with Maenads and Nymphs and wine culture accompanied by the ithyphallic goat-footed and nailed figures with sexual super-activity, called Satyrs and Sileni.
Phallic worship centered on all these gods: Pan, Priapus, and the Dionysian cult. The representation of a supernatural phallus remained a permanent feature in all the fertility festive manifestations.
Furthermore, the exaggerated size of an erected male organ was strongly believed to bring virility, fertility and good luck, as a symbol of the regenerating power of Nature. In urban centers, like ancient Athens, the worship of the god Hermes was expressed with columns at the main streets bearing the god’s head on the top and an ithyphallus on the base.
The artistic evidence implies that over-large genitals were considered aesthetically unpleasing by the Greeks and Romans. The ideal type of male beauty, epitomized in classical sculpture, normally depicts genitals of somewhat less than average size.
Consequently, the exaggerated genitals of Priapus made him seem ugly and grotesque figure, though benevolent. The small penises shown on ordinary mortals may have been no more than a convention, to distinguish them from fertility figures, such as Pan, Satyrs and Priapus. It also had been pointed out that many of these images belong to athletes during or immediately after hard exercise with the penis shrunk and the testicles hoist high.
Rempelakos L, Tsiamis C, Poulakou-Rebelakou E. Penile representations in ancient Greek art. Arch Esp Urol 2013;66(10):911-6. Archivos Espa
OBJECTIVES: The presentation of the cult of phallus in ancient Greece and the artistic appearance of the phenomenon on vase figures and statues, as indicative of the significant role of the male genitalia in all fertility ceremonies.
METHODS: The examination of a great number of penile representations from the ancient Greek pottery and sculpture and the review of the ancient theater plays (satiric dramas and comedies ).
RESULTS: Phallus in artistic representation is connected either with gods of fertility, such as the goat-footed and horned Pan or the ugly dwarf Priapus or the semi-animal nailed figures Satyrs, devotees of the god Dionysus accompanying him in all ritual orgiastic celebrations. Phallus also symbolizes good luck, health and sexuality: people bear or wear artificial phalli exactly like the actors as part of their costume or carry huge penises during the festive ritual processions.
On the contrary, the Olympic gods or the ordinary mortals are not imaged ithyphallic; the ideal type of male beauty epitomized in classical sculpture, normally depicts genitals of average or less than average size. It is noteworthy that many of these images belong to athletes during or immediately after hard exercise with the penis shrunk. The normal size genitalia may have been simply a convention to distinguish normal people from the gods of sexuality and fertility, protectors of the reproductive process of Nature.
CONCLUSIONS: The representation of the over-sized and erected genitalia on vase figures or statues of ancient Greek art is related to fertility gods such as Priapus, Pan and Satyrs and there is strong evidence that imagination and legend were replacing the scientific achievements in the field of erectile function for many centuries.
I bet there is a direct connection between penis size and female booty size. I bet a chinaman would have a hard time hitting bottom on a big booty west africa girl.
MANWHORE
Subscriber
A small bootie holds less sweat, so keeps clean longer.
This is why I like them. I love eating pussy, and whatever else is around it.
Big booties also have dimples which turns me off.
I also like clean tight pussies. not all that roast beef hanging out..
Next time a girl says you have a small penis,
just tell her all the things I just mentioned. Watch how fast she runs off crying.
Especially:
"You have a little dick"
"No honey, you have a huge used pussy"
This is why I like them. I love eating pussy, and whatever else is around it.
Big booties also have dimples which turns me off.
I also like clean tight pussies. not all that roast beef hanging out..
Next time a girl says you have a small penis,
just tell her all the things I just mentioned. Watch how fast she runs off crying.
Especially:
"You have a little dick"
"No honey, you have a huge used pussy"
Uhh-Uhhh - SHIT WAS MAD TIGHT ON ME G..... 
A small bootie holds less sweat, so keeps clean longer.
This is why I like them. I love eating pussy, and whatever else is around it.
Big booties also have dimples which turns me off.
I also like clean tight pussies. not all that roast beef hanging out..
Next time a girl says you have a small penis,
just tell her all the things I just mentioned. Watch how fast she runs off crying.
Especially:
"You have a little dick"
"No honey, you have a huge used pussy"
Similar threads
Sponsors
Latest posts
-
-
Wuhan Wansheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (USA, International)
- Latest: Andrewthatguy
-
-
