kosp
Member
Okay I think this is a crucial topic I am highly concerned, I would appreciate your insight based on experience, logic and science, or all together.
I have a case study proposal,
let's assume the following:
-You cycle between 8 to 12 weeks, no more than that.
-You never use tren (brutally suppresive)
-You always go with your HCG
-You properly PCT and rest between cycles, this is, once you are done with your PCT SERMs, you wait about double time than you spent pinning. Natty is awesome too, and still you can have a lot of fun every year. (Personally I do one cycle per year...)
Now imagine I have been doing this for many years, is there any chance I get my HPTA weaker than a forever natty one?
I have a case study proposal,
let's assume the following:
-You cycle between 8 to 12 weeks, no more than that.
-You never use tren (brutally suppresive)
-You always go with your HCG
-You properly PCT and rest between cycles, this is, once you are done with your PCT SERMs, you wait about double time than you spent pinning. Natty is awesome too, and still you can have a lot of fun every year. (Personally I do one cycle per year...)
Now imagine I have been doing this for many years, is there any chance I get my HPTA weaker than a forever natty one?
Last edited: