Shouldn't you decrease price of deca for example until the new batch are stocked in domestic warehouse?
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
MESO-Rx Sponsor Pharmacom Labs officials and our Basicstero.com store
- Thread starter PHL Official
- Start date
RThoads
Subscriber
Appreciate the honesty regarding the deca and tren @Pharmacom Labs.
1) So is it only the deca and tren batches in the USA domestic store that you believe are under dosed?
2) When was the process changed to one that gives you confidence that new batches are better?
3) Should I expect recent orders in the past two weeks from the international store to be from new improved batches or are they at risk of being under dosed in your opinion?
I ask because I also order for some other people which I charge and if they are under dosed I want to know so I may be open about it to those people or else I may lose credibility.
thank you again for being open with communication and admitting what the issues were--I appreciate it if you can clarify these points listed.
@RThoads good post! Would like to know as well.
I wish I would have been paying closer attention to the tests at anaboliclab. I just placed an order of deca. Shit.
@Pharmacom Labs Thanks for the honesty and timely responses. I have a feeling you'll make it right.
I wish I would have been paying closer attention to the tests at anaboliclab. I just placed an order of deca. Shit.
@Pharmacom Labs Thanks for the honesty and timely responses. I have a feeling you'll make it right.
ronin17
New Member
Please get it tested. You can get it tested without it coming back to you. This is what needs to be done. These guys have to be held accountable. Thanks for your effort!
ronin17
New Member
Please tell me you are personally sending sample for testing. Not sending to frank to resend.
Ready4Juice
New Member
Yes thanks for the honesty Phamacom Labs. Just wondering if the mixes with tren and deca in them that are at the domestic warehouse might be under dosed as well.
Allergy man
New Member
I am sending the one I received a few months ago directly to simec. No middle man, no swapping. Just an honest submission for everyone to benefit from.
ronin17
New Member
You are awesome my man!!
DeM0NiCs
New Member
Ordered from int store for the first time and was hoping to get pack in 14 or so days from date of order. Tracking # just became active today 10 days after my order and it says the pack has just arrived in Hong Kong. Look like I'm going to be waiting awhile. Anyone order from int sore recently if so how long did it take your pack?
That happened to me once a while back. You'll get it. Once it shows received at Hong Kong it shouldn't take too long to get there unless it gets bounced around between post offices/customs after it lands...which also happened to me.
Ive learned not to worry to much about tracking, last time tracking said could not locate, two days later it was at my door.
Why are you posting about shipping times publicly? That's stuff that should be kept out of the open.
I assume your talking to DeMONICs, as i never talk about days or times i order. Ive given up trying to suggest everybody do the same.
Yessir, that is correct.
Hardtokill
New Member
Anybody had a pack stuck after processing according to tracking? Stuck on our side not Asia side.
we will do something for sure. Just did not think yet what and now you have a great promo which fully covers all shortcomings!
1all these questions are connected. the problem is that concentration depends on the temperature and oil viscosity exactly at the moment when raws are added. Before we calculated concentration as per formula based on volumen. This is not very precize as you understand. Now we implemented a new equipment/sensor, which is capable to measure exact oil viscosity. Due to this deviations will be less. The process was changed with a new batch. I can not tell now about timing exactly, cause i am in another country kind of on vocation now. But batch with other symbols is already rectified. I can`t say now which numbers are there for the same reason, i am away now. But max ppssible underdosage is no more as 10% for sure. This is generally not so much. Especially considering that lot of other manufacturer do not have such equipment as we do!
Deviations in mixes are also possible yes. Generally in all oils...all oild before were calculated only on volumen. But we tried to add a bit more raws. This is the reason why one substance can have 10% overdosage as bold and another - underdosage as deca. We will for sure not once test future batches and you will see results. We need only time... And money
I hoped exact locations will not be disclosed here. I have already explained this. We take our safety precautions, which takes 1-2 days + custom clearence in the shipper country 2-6 days. So somethimes tracking number can appear really only after 6-10 days. But after that it arrives the States ithin 5-7 days as a rule. 14 days is in most cases enough. Sometimes earlier.
DeM0NiCs
New Member
While I doubt very much they will be able to pinpoint a pack floating around said country along with half a million other packs I do see your point it was not necessary to give timeline and country my bad sometimes I type before I think.
Thank you and no worries. Just trying to keep what should be private,private.
I received couple of other results from Simec. 2 of them are of good purity.
1.
the third one is not so good... but i told you you will see all results independent on how good or bad they are and I keep my word. Yes this is not in our interests, but I hope with the time you will see, that we are not going to lie and hide the truth by all means. Here is the third result.
97.3%. In essays you can see no, because 98.5% is the minimum limit we asked Simec to set. If less that 98,5% this is a not a pass. However this sample could have more moisture. As you remember Simec told 100.7% is probably because the sample is too dry. Here could be the opposite situation. I sent all info to my boss and tomorrow he will have a conversation regarding this with our supplier. If you remember, I told in the very beginning, that we did not test these samples ourselves. The previous sample of nandrolone phenyl (in fact the current, which is on the market now) was ok, however also not as high as it could be. Here is the result of previous nandrolone phenyl batch:
[/URL]
99.198%. We will do our best to imrove all results.
And finally the last thing. I do not know how demanded it will be, but we decided to produce a limited amount of clothes with our symbols. I am looking for a supplier with high quality products. We will put clothes into some bigger orders. Will see how it will turn. If good we continue this.
1.
the third one is not so good... but i told you you will see all results independent on how good or bad they are and I keep my word. Yes this is not in our interests, but I hope with the time you will see, that we are not going to lie and hide the truth by all means. Here is the third result.
97.3%. In essays you can see no, because 98.5% is the minimum limit we asked Simec to set. If less that 98,5% this is a not a pass. However this sample could have more moisture. As you remember Simec told 100.7% is probably because the sample is too dry. Here could be the opposite situation. I sent all info to my boss and tomorrow he will have a conversation regarding this with our supplier. If you remember, I told in the very beginning, that we did not test these samples ourselves. The previous sample of nandrolone phenyl (in fact the current, which is on the market now) was ok, however also not as high as it could be. Here is the result of previous nandrolone phenyl batch:
[/URL]
99.198%. We will do our best to imrove all results.
And finally the last thing. I do not know how demanded it will be, but we decided to produce a limited amount of clothes with our symbols. I am looking for a supplier with high quality products. We will put clothes into some bigger orders. Will see how it will turn. If good we continue this.
Thanks for posting these up @Pharmacom Labs
Similar threads
- Sticky
