pharmacom test e. possible heavy metal

[MitchFit]

Transient changes aren't worth the breath to talk about really. Do we know how much they went up? Regardless they're still within normal ranges and it could have came from anything ie diet, occupational exposure, etc etc

I would like OP to post a baseline for his father's previous results.

 

[Docd187123]

Ok. So this thread inspired me to do some research. While OPs father's levels of Arsenic and Mercury are technically "normal", they do show that he is being exposed to both of those metals from somewhere.

From what I've found. People in the United States should have levels of 0.3-0.4 mcg/L for arsenic (OP dad has level of 4) and mercury levels should be like 1 mcg/L (OP's dad is 8).

This is a bit concerning....
OP can you provide a baseline for heavy metals from your father's previous blood work?

But if you look at the actual blood work, the values look to be in normal range for the lab's reference ranges.

 

[G2Ready]

But if you look at the actual blood work, the values look to be in normal range for the lab's reference ranges.

So are you saying if it was PC injectables, giving him the hard metals it would be over acceptable limits? Or that it's within normal limits so who cares where it comes from?

 

[G2Ready]

Did anyone actually look at the lab report? Everything was normal and in-range for blood serum heavy metals.

There has been a lot of question about "batch" numbers used by PC---- considering ALOT of people have same number even on different compounds..... could simply be some LARGE batches that take several years to sell, but question of quality control by batch numbers has come up

 

[MitchFit]

So are you saying if it was PC injectables, giving him the hard metals it would be over acceptable limits? Or that it's within normal limits so who cares where it comes from?

I think he is saying the latter. However, I've read that neurotoxic side effects of mercury can come from levels around 8 mcg/L. Studies show, people in the United States have around 1 mcg/L if they are NOT exposed to any mercury. OP's dad has x8 times that amount. Of course his levels are not alarmingly high, but I still wouldn't want those levels in my system for a lengthy period of time because that is where the damage can be done.

We really don't know much about his situation. Those levels could have come from a number of things like work exposure and/or diet.

I would really like more information from OP if he could give us it.

I want to add, anabolic lab doesn't show any contamination analysis for pharmacom Test-E300 or really any of their other products for that matter.

 

[MitchFit]

There has been a lot of question about "batch" numbers used by PC---- considering ALOT of people have same number even on different compounds..... could simply be some LARGE batches that take several years to sell, but question of quality control by batch numbers has come up

Yeah pharmacom's batch numbers are a bit sketchy to me. Considering that gear from the same batch numbers have shown markedly different testosterone concentrations. But that's not a big deal unless they're underdosed, which I haven't seen. Heavy metal contamination is a big deal to me though.

 

[Docd187123]

So are you saying if it was PC injectables, giving him the hard metals it would be over acceptable limits? Or that it's within normal limits so who cares where it comes from?

It's within normal limits so it's not something anyone should be freaking out over.

 

[Docd187123]

I think he is saying the latter. However, I've read that neurotoxic side effects of mercury can come from levels around 8 mcg/L. Studies show, people in the United States have around 1 mcg/L if they are NOT exposed to any mercury. OP's dad has x8 times that amount. Of course his levels are not alarmingly high, but I still wouldn't want those levels in my system for a lengthy period of time because that is where the damage can be done.

We really don't know much about his situation. Those levels could have come from a number of things like work exposure and/or diet.

I would really like more information from OP if he could give us it.

I want to add, anabolic lab doesn't show any contamination analysis for pharmacom Test-E300 or really any of their other products for that matter.

He is fine. You realize dentists for example routinely have levels of 15ng/ml or slightly higher even and they're not dropping like flies with neurotoxicity?

 

[Millard]

There has been a lot of question about "batch" numbers used by PC---- considering ALOT of people have same number even on different compounds..... could simply be some LARGE batches that take several years to sell, but question of quality control by batch numbers has come up

That's an entirely different question than the heavy metal numbers recorded on the lab report. But yes, the Pharmacom "batch" numbering is unusual. It refers to a single batch of raws and NOT a single production batch. In other words, a single batch number could result in hundreds of production runs.

 

[crossfitisgay]

That's an entirely different question than the heavy metal numbers recorded on the lab report. But yes, the Pharmacom "batch" numbering is unusual. It refers to a single batch of raws and NOT a single production batch. In other words, a single batch number could result in hundreds of production runs.

Which is a noobie lazy fuck mistake sorry ass system

 

[G.I. Bro]

Cilantro is not going to help with heavy metal toxicity. That article is garbage.

Chelation: Harnessing and Enhancing Heavy Metal Detoxification—A Review

Agree. Most of the supplemental options don't seem that likely to do much. If your blood results are bad there are several rx only drugs to help remove the heavy metals. I've never had an issue, personally.

 

[PHL Official]

@Pharmacom Helper
@Pharmacom Labs

shall i comment this? i saw values within references. if heavy metals were in gear, values were by times higher.

 

[Big pump]

shall i comment this? i saw values within references. if heavy metals were in gear, values were by times higher.

Can you elaborate on "times higher"? So you have seen results when someone had heavy metal contaminationin gear?

 

[drgreenthumb628]

I'll work on getting the numbers on his baseline heavy metals. and he does eat salmon but only rarely nothing out of the ordinary for his diet

 

[drgreenthumb628]

this is frome test e 250mg amps. and was he was taking 1 amp per week sometimes 1.5 weeks so it wasn't like he was blasting the gear

 

[MitchFit]

this is frome test e 250mg amps. and was he was taking 1 amp per week sometimes 1.5 weeks so it wasn't like he was blasting the gear

So he was only getting testosterone levels of 600 on 250mg testosterone per week? Was this at a trough level?

 

[drgreenthumb628]

250mg but his pin schedual wasn't entirly consistant. it was usually around 1.5 weeks per 250mg sometimes sooner. his test levels were the same as his pharma trt injection test levels at same dose. for that bw they were in the 690s. the potency is not in question

 

[MitchFit]

250mg but his pin schedual wasn't entirly consistant. it was usually around 1.5 weeks per 250mg sometimes sooner. his test levels were the same as his pharma trt injection test levels at same dose. for that bw they were in the 690s. the potency is not in question

That's good to know the testosterone was effective.

 

[MitchFit]

250mg but his pin schedual wasn't entirly consistant. it was usually around 1.5 weeks per 250mg sometimes sooner. his test levels were the same as his pharma trt injection test levels at same dose. for that bw they were in the 690s. the potency is not in question

BTW any luck with the baseline numbers?

 

[drgreenthumb628]

he said that his blood work in the past has not shown exposure to heavy metals. i have not seen those results but I will work on getting a copy of them