Now that i'm done with work, off tomorrow and my belly is full, i'm in a much better mood to speak to our new friend
@Necessary Evil .
To begin, there's nothing wrong with asking people for past experiences with a source. What they tell you should be taken as one part of your overall decision.
That's why we preach to read the threads. So you can see for yourself what people are happy about and what people are up in arms about when it comes to a source.
Asking if he's consistently legit is a crapshoot. PS, like every other UGL (hopefully) does his best to churn out a quality product, but he, like the rest, is at the mercy of his raws supplier. Without testing each and every batch of raws, it's really a guessing game of hoping the raws are as pure as stated by his supplier.
Without that consistent, methodical approach, there's never going to be a source that is consistently on the mark, every single time.
Lastly, the dreaded "g2g" question. No one with a conscious can say in good conscious that you should take this or that from a source and inject it into your body.
What if that particular batch that you received wasn't sterile and you got seriously fucked up from it? Now that person is on the hook for pushing it on you because they gave you a seal of approval that ended badly.
As much as we mother fuck one another around here, i don't think anyone wants to see a fellow brother get hurt, and they especially don't want to be the one that was instrumental in someone else's misery.