Sorry thats my typo. 50x100 is right . Made a typo because of Chemtox test, they wrote Modafinil 50mg, should be 100mg, they overturned MGs vs Pieces .
Thanks for notice sir.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Pharmasource EU pharmaceuticals
- Thread starter pharmasource
- Start date
Sorry thats my typo. 50x100 is right . Made a typo because of Chemtox test, they wrote Modafinil 50mg, should be 100mg, they overturned MGs vs Pieces .
Thanks for notice sir.
Exactly
My unsolicited advice to the the doubters and non-believers of this source...
If you truly wish to make a difference or influence the other members viewing this thread, then attempt to speak at least semi-intelligently, and form logical arguments for why you believe that this source should not be trusted and/or used.
The ludicrous name calling and "faggot" this, "suck cock" that comments, almost IMMEDIATELY disqualify your posts from being taken seriously by 99% of the audience you are posting to. Which, after all, I assume is your intent when posting in this thread - to influence and/or inform those reading your posts.
And if this is not your intent, then why even waste your time posting in this thread?
Admittedly, I have not been in this thread much over the last several months, but just reading through the last 5 or 6 pages tonight, I am so confused as to the purpose of some of the posts here.
The more aggressive, belligerent, and disrespectful you are, the more likely you are to have your posts ignored (literally) and discredited by the folks reading this thread. Which, again, defeats the purpose of even posting here. At that point, you are basically "talking just to hear your own voice" because almost no one here is even reading your posts, and if they are, they sure as hell are not trusting in what you are saying.
I'm not trying to lecture anyone (although admittedly I sure do sound like I am lecturing, lol), just trying to encourage some of you who are talking the most and the loudest, to use that energy to argue in a way that might produce positive results.
A coupe of years back in this thread (I believe it was that long ago) @mands and myself and a couple of others had concerns about the packaging techniques being used by this source. We went back and forth with the source and some other members here, respectfully (at least as I recall it), and to @pharmasource credit, he ultimately listened and made improvements that made receiving his packs safer. Not patting anyone on the back, just making the point that a little civility and respect go a long way when voicing concerns and questioning things here.
I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'....
Respectfully.
If you truly wish to make a difference or influence the other members viewing this thread, then attempt to speak at least semi-intelligently, and form logical arguments for why you believe that this source should not be trusted and/or used.
The ludicrous name calling and "faggot" this, "suck cock" that comments, almost IMMEDIATELY disqualify your posts from being taken seriously by 99% of the audience you are posting to. Which, after all, I assume is your intent when posting in this thread - to influence and/or inform those reading your posts.
And if this is not your intent, then why even waste your time posting in this thread?
Admittedly, I have not been in this thread much over the last several months, but just reading through the last 5 or 6 pages tonight, I am so confused as to the purpose of some of the posts here.
The more aggressive, belligerent, and disrespectful you are, the more likely you are to have your posts ignored (literally) and discredited by the folks reading this thread. Which, again, defeats the purpose of even posting here. At that point, you are basically "talking just to hear your own voice" because almost no one here is even reading your posts, and if they are, they sure as hell are not trusting in what you are saying.
I'm not trying to lecture anyone (although admittedly I sure do sound like I am lecturing, lol), just trying to encourage some of you who are talking the most and the loudest, to use that energy to argue in a way that might produce positive results.
A coupe of years back in this thread (I believe it was that long ago) @mands and myself and a couple of others had concerns about the packaging techniques being used by this source. We went back and forth with the source and some other members here, respectfully (at least as I recall it), and to @pharmasource credit, he ultimately listened and made improvements that made receiving his packs safer. Not patting anyone on the back, just making the point that a little civility and respect go a long way when voicing concerns and questioning things here.
I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'....
Respectfully.
Thanks sir, after long time very true post from very respected member ( no offense other respected guys here )
Necessary Evil
Well-known Member
@bickel29, couldn't have said it any better. For me, it all boils down to mutual respect between members and acting like adults. They can say and should say whatever they want to vet a source as long as they are respectful to each other.
MisterSuit
Well-known Member
Call me Sherlock.
This is exactly what I tried to say. Every review or comment should be mature and impartial.
14000 post challenge
Post nr. 14000 receive :
6 blisters Nolvadex 10mg
2 blisters Wochard Anastozol
(open for all members, except well know trolls )
Post nr. 14000 receive :
6 blisters Nolvadex 10mg
2 blisters Wochard Anastozol
(open for all members, except well know trolls )
The anastrazol I got was bunk, even Mr suit said his was
Did you test the raws for the modafinil? 25% off seems alot for production mistakes on your side.
Because of your feelings ? I got actual anastrozol line tested, results posted - 1,2mg. Post your test.
My feelings, Mr suits bloodwork
Modafinil is for me little ,,strange,, All substances in higher concentacions ( for Example Oxymetholon, Tadalafil etc ) are overdosed in results. Modafinil never. My oppinion thats because of his specific powder density, so its possible, that concentration in tablets will be unequal. A guy who making tablets said that for modafinil will be needed different filler and hardener, or better solution will be get it into capsoules.
Because total number of tablets was correct to amount of RAW. From 500gr RAW was made 9800tablets.
Sorry , I belive more HPLC-CAD test, like yours feelings sir. Especially after your behaviour in this thread.
MisterSuit
Well-known Member
lol never said mine was “surely” bunk. Wtf, I always only made hypothesis..
Will you change the process? I dont have a problem taking one more pill to get the desired amount but i dont want to guess.
I can do only test of my products, and I have it done. Now will be tested pharm -grade. may be in future will be tested new anastrozol line again.
For me will be better to upgrade equipment and buy a good capsoule filler.
MisterSuit
Well-known Member
In fact I was also saying that Letrozole didn’t lower my E2 much more.
AIRBORNE DADDY
Well-known Member
Yeah ur boy picholas or whatever has almost fourteen hundred posts in ten weeks...he'll be at 14000 in two weeks.
One customer contacted me and have a bloodtest done, with my testosterone, masteron and pharm grade proviron and exemestane. Hope he post it soon
Similar threads
Sponsors
Latest posts
-
-
TrenboloneTax: Hybrid Cycling / Lifting Log aka Make Hulk Bike Fast- Latest: Trenbolonetax
-
-