First, thank you for getting the testing done.
Second, thanks for posting the less-than-favorable results.
Third, I agree that the Primus Ray Test C result is disappointing, but JUST AS EQUALLY disappointing - from a test result standpoint, calculating the deviation from label claim on a percentage basis - is the Tren A result.
If my math is correct, the deviation from label claim on the Test C 250 is a deviation of -12%.
The deviation from label claim on the Tren A is a deviation of -11%.
If we are to be disappointed/concerned about one result, then naturally we should have the same reaction to both, right?
And just to be clear, you stated that there is a "5% deflection".
While I FULLY SUPPORT ANY SOURCE RUNNING THEIR BUSINESS HOWEVER THEY WANT TO (ie, selling whatever they decide to sell), THIS IS WHY so many members here encourage sources of legit pharmaceutical products NOT to also sell UGL items.
Legit Pharma items carry very little risk of harming your credibility as a source. But one thing we have learned over the years is that UGL gear will almost always let you down eventually, sooner or later.
Again, I applaud you for getting the testing done and sharing the results, even if they were not as good as you had hoped. And also, again, I have no problem with you running your business however you choose to do so. But this is the risk you run by stocking and selling UGL gear.