Very few of us have access to proper testing in order to objectively quantify what the contents of 10g of "x" steroid really are. I don't mean impurities and contaminants, but the percentage of AAS in a raw amount of powder. Without any such means of testing, that means guessing. But some guesses are more informed than others.
So I got a question that maybe some of you can answer. But truth be told, I doubt there are many who can answer it, as it requires technical insight into synthesis of AAS powders, etc.
__________
If you've got "10g winstrol" or "10g anadrol"...How much of those 10g is actually pure winstrol/anadrol? Well if you bought from Sigma Aldrich, it would be 98% or thereabouts. The chinese aren't Sigma Aldrich, though.
But let's say your Chinese supplier has not diluted the product with some other substance. The AAS powder has not been cut. It is the direct result of the manufacturing process/synthesis the producer used. So he isn't out to cheat you.
However, it's not an unreasonable thought that the Chinese will not use super-duper expensive synthesis or purification to yield 98%. On the other hand, they DO manufacture said AAS. I mention win and anadrol as these are less commonly faked, as I believe they are cheaper to produce than say primo or anavar. So let's keep the dicussuion on the stuff that is easy/cheap to make.
And this is where the technical knowledge comes on. If you've got your "average" or most common synthesis of AAS powders for distribution in the West, what % content does this synthesis produce?
If there are 100 methods of synthesis and no method is more likely than the other, well then close the thread already and let's all blindly guess. But I would expect it more probable that some percentages are much more common than others, because one or few kinds of manufacturing processes are much more comonly used.
tl;dr: If you've got 10g of winny or oxy from your average chinese source and he hasn't cut the product, what % concentration is more likely given the most likely manuf. process?
A reply like "you'll never know, could be anything" is trivial and does not answer the question.
So I got a question that maybe some of you can answer. But truth be told, I doubt there are many who can answer it, as it requires technical insight into synthesis of AAS powders, etc.
__________
If you've got "10g winstrol" or "10g anadrol"...How much of those 10g is actually pure winstrol/anadrol? Well if you bought from Sigma Aldrich, it would be 98% or thereabouts. The chinese aren't Sigma Aldrich, though.
But let's say your Chinese supplier has not diluted the product with some other substance. The AAS powder has not been cut. It is the direct result of the manufacturing process/synthesis the producer used. So he isn't out to cheat you.
However, it's not an unreasonable thought that the Chinese will not use super-duper expensive synthesis or purification to yield 98%. On the other hand, they DO manufacture said AAS. I mention win and anadrol as these are less commonly faked, as I believe they are cheaper to produce than say primo or anavar. So let's keep the dicussuion on the stuff that is easy/cheap to make.
And this is where the technical knowledge comes on. If you've got your "average" or most common synthesis of AAS powders for distribution in the West, what % content does this synthesis produce?
If there are 100 methods of synthesis and no method is more likely than the other, well then close the thread already and let's all blindly guess. But I would expect it more probable that some percentages are much more common than others, because one or few kinds of manufacturing processes are much more comonly used.
tl;dr: If you've got 10g of winny or oxy from your average chinese source and he hasn't cut the product, what % concentration is more likely given the most likely manuf. process?
A reply like "you'll never know, could be anything" is trivial and does not answer the question.
