Private Label

@T-Bagger Nope.

https://brotherhoodofpain.com/private-label/57761-public-service-announcement-1.html
Oh Jano, stirring up shit at BoP now and they referenced @mands post there. It’s funny how BoP hates Meso and calls us a joke but didn’t hesitate to use his thread about you.

He (PL) claims to use an FDA accredited lab to test his raws and has physically walked through it. So I wonder if this lab is in the US or if PL is sitting in China too, like a majority of them.
 
@janoshik, I read your replies and you said that it was very possible that PL used Mast E and not Mast P and that your machine wouldn’t pick it up. You said in post Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services that you can take blind samples of Mast E and Mast P. So why didn’t your test blindly identify the Mast? I know what you said over at BoP, but if you can blindly test Mast E, your machine should have identified it, should it?
 
Oh Jano, stirring up shit at BoP now and they referenced @mands post there. It’s funny how BoP hates Meso and calls us a joke but didn’t hesitate to use his thread about you.

He (PL) claims to use an FDA accredited lab to test his raws and has physically walked through it. So I wonder if this lab is in the US or if PL is sitting in China too, like a majority of them.
Well, seems like hypocrisy is a common trail for many.

Now the fun story begins, however.

https://brotherhoodofpain.com/private-label/57761-public-service-announcement-3.html#post875992

Now find 10 differences:

https://iasuperpharma.is/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Anavar-Raw-and-Capaule-Page-1-799x1024.jpg

( https://iasuperpharma.is/hplc-gc-ms-reports/ - scroll down, click Anavar, 4th page )

Also, try checking out if the analytical company does really exist :)
 
@janoshik, I read your replies and you said that it was very possible that PL used Mast E and not Mast P and that your machine wouldn’t pick it up. You said in post Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services that you can take blind samples of Mast E and Mast P. So why didn’t your test blindly identify the Mast? I know what you said over at BoP, but if you can blindly test Mast E, your machine should have identified it, should it?
It was not a blind sample.

I was told it's supposed to contain 3 compounds (mast p and tren a and test p - not 100% sure, going by memory) at 100 mg/ml.

My analytical task was to determine whether the sample indeed contains the said components at 100 mg/ml, not screen it for mast e.
 
It was not a blind sample.

I was told it's supposed to contain 3 compounds (mast p and tren a and test p - not 100% sure, going by memory) at 100 mg/ml.

My analytical task was to determine whether the sample indeed contains the said components at 100 mg/ml, not screen it for mast e.
So is blind testing different than known testing? For example - you were told to test for 3 specifics and only 2 showed up. Is that becuase you programmed your machine to only find Mast P? I don’t get it though because if you can do blind testing, logic says the machine would have identified 3 compounds and would say what they were. Again, that’s logic, not coming from an educated background in this type of thing.
 
So is blind testing different than known testing? For example - you were told to test for 3 specifics and only 2 showed up. Is that becuase you programmed your machine to only find Mast P? I don’t get it though because if you can do blind testing, logic says the machine would have identified 3 compounds and would say what they were. Again, that’s logic, not coming from an educated background in this type of thing.
My job was to determine whether the product fits specifications, which it did not, in this case.

Basically, yes, the machine was programmed to determine those 3 compounds with priority (and most common contaminants). Mast E can sometimes require a special test to be done, which I did not run.

So even though I think that there was no Mast E, I don't have conclusive proof of that and have to give benefit of doubt to the vendor.
 
But why didn’t your machine detect the hormones present? Is that different testing methods?
So to put it simple - my machines did detect the hormones present and it didn't detect nor mast P nor mast E.

However, I didn't run a special test to 100% disprove content of mast e, so I cannot claim with 100% confidence that there was none. And despite the said sponsor and his rep are being massive cunts towards me, I'm giving them the benefit of doubt.
 
So to put it simple - my machines did detect the hormones present and it didn't detect nor mast P nor mast E.

However, I didn't run a special test to 100% disprove content of mast e, so I cannot claim with 100% confidence that there was none. And despite the said sponsor and his rep are being massive cunts towards me, I'm giving them the benefit of doubt.
I think your machine would have detected the compounds, regardless.
 
So according to members here, after the previous incident with @mands is Jano now a credible lab.

I have purchased products from PL and after seeing those lab pictures I am becoming increasingly nervous that I have just gotten fucked over. I am really hoping that is not the case.

I was in a bind and had to buy some test cyp from them after being dicked over by some Dictator gear and compared to the Dictator’s test it was a much smoother inject.

I did roidtest their anadrol and anavar and it did come back spot on though.
 
So according to members here, after the previous incident with @mands is Jano now a credible lab.

I have purchased products from PL and after seeing those lab pictures I am becoming increasingly nervous that I have just gotten fucked over. I am really hoping that is not the case.

I was in a bind and had to buy some test cyp from them after being dicked over by some Dictator gear and compared to the Dictator’s test it was a much smoother inject.

I did roidtest their anadrol and anavar and it did come back spot on though.
You got dicked over by The Dictator’s Gear? Wow - I’ve only heard positive about them.

As far as Jano goes, I would read the threads all posted in the PL thread at BOP and come to your own conclusion, which also includes the thread here started by @mands.
 
Yes brutal/crippling pain every time I have injected his test cyp. I am currently on 100mgs of his anadrol as we speak. I have been on it now for 12 days and feel absolutely nothing. No strength gains, no weight gain, no elevated blood pressure, nothing. This is with 100mgs!
 
Yes brutal/crippling pain every time I have injected his test cyp. I am currently on 100mgs of his anadrol as we speak. I have been on it now for 12 days and feel absolutely nothing. No strength gains, no weight gain, no elevated blood pressure, nothing. This is with 100mgs!
Dang, that’s highly unusual for TD. Have you contacted them? If you need your stuff tested, check out the thread W&M Analytical Liaison (U.S. Domestic)
 
Typical BOP shit show. Customer has complaint with proof and documentation, They berate them, the testing and after they have their bro bash, lock and eventually delete the thread. That fucking rep, what a tool. I have made known my distain for that shit stain. Everyone's a scammer except the lab hes repping. They are infallable.

Unfortunately, everyone knows they can only be as good as their raws and their units of measurement. I can forgive that if the lab admits fault and tries to correct it, but when they unleash that pathetic meat head to discredit people cause hes all tren'd up and ready to argue, thats when I can write a lab off completely. Who the fuck wants to deal with that shit?

This is in no way defending Jano, but he is across multiple platforms and will occasionally get something guessed right. Lmao.
 
Back
Top