PurplePandaLabs And Monkey King Anabolics Are The Same Lab

Yes I’ve hounded this clown for a very long time about his security. Which they claim is un crackable but it is far from uncrackable.

Besides the fact panda himself broke his own security policy and sold users information to a third party and once called out for it he back tracked and said it was his partner who actually did it.

Edit: wrong thread. Thought I was in a different thread. My fault.

Edit 2: just realized this is a thread dedicated to both labs.... my head is blown lmfao.

Monkey King

1236166824_peeinmouth.gif
 
Just asked my girl. She agrees they are the same. If the nipples are simply harder they change color. And as well as lighting. (Obviously)

Can you please post pics of your gf tits when hard,soft, different weather,etc?
No disrespect to her you know, this is just to prove your point and everything will be evaluated in a scientific way.


It looks like Panda might be preparing to abandon the sinking PPL ship and rebrand as Monkey King Anabolics.

I have confirmed that they are using the same VPN and IP in China.
IDK about VPNs but yeah, both domains are hosted in the same company with the same IP.


View attachment 102050
View attachment 102051

Lol, these tits look awfully alike. The top one from MK was cropped for a very good reason too I imagine if it was taken in the same bathroom. Bottom one posted by PPL. Sadly, sources get traction when they do post these pics.

The sentence structure, intro, marketing technique... All looks very similar. I browsed the intro, didn't give it a lot of thought. Didn't MK show up right around the time the PPL rep was brought on? Directly prior to that, PPL wanted to eliminate the previous rep and get back to being available to his customers directly... Not too long after that, the retard rep 2dumb gets hired and MK makes an entrance.
What was the other source that had like 20 alias?
Was that quality raws?


I don’t think it’s the same woman. The nipples are a lot different. But we’ve definitely all speculated they’re one and the same. MK is all about the bling, including his monkey head vials with gold leaf on them. Panda is all about the bling.
And both sources feature animals panda, monkey
At least they didn't call it golden monkey.
 
Without divulging too much, many sources leave themselves vulnerable because they don't take their security seriously enough. Panda needs to tighten things up.
Is it not because you are using the user data obtained from the forum administration interface therefore severely breaking the trust of everybody using the forum?

Because it's either that, or you made both of them click on the same link which tracked their data - which is also bannable offense, as per what @Millard Baker says.

Does anybody else see any other way he could have determined that?
 
Well fellas, case closed.

CBS tackled this thing from a tech perspective but EJE's girl and I took a more stylish approach with our risque photo evidence.

These threads always happen around Christmas...
I like your style way more.
 
Zero question these titties not being one in the same. Women will always be the downfall of men. Always.

Also who creates two separate businesses exploiting wildlife for personal gain? Sick.

View attachment 102050
View attachment 102051

Lol, these tits look awfully alike. The top one from MK was cropped for a very good reason too I imagine if it was taken in the same bathroom. Bottom one posted by PPL. Sadly, sources get traction when they do post these pics.

The sentence structure, intro, marketing technique... All looks very similar. I browsed the intro, didn't give it a lot of thought. Didn't MK show up right around the time the PPL rep was brought on? Directly prior to that, PPL wanted to eliminate the previous rep and get back to being available to his customers directly... Not too long after that, the retard rep 2dumb gets hired and MK makes an entrance.
 
Last edited:
Did you click any links posted to your email / private messages from anybody? Or did you receive any at all?

Not to my knowledge. My vpn has 20 different servers that it randomly connects to. If the poster of this simply did a website domain check and saw my website and my competitors website domains are hosted by the same domain registrar it’s because their is only one company in China to buy domain names from basically. It’s the domain name group called aliyuan. They are a subsidiary of the alibaba corporation.

I can go around and say I have a 12” dick and five Lamborghinis but that doesn’t make it true. What happened to America being the land of innocent until proven guilty. So how about throw some evidence up for everyone to see instead of just making a random smear thread that is probably working in accordance to some agenda you’re on
 
Not to my knowledge. My vpn has 20 different servers that it randomly connects to. If the poster of this simply did a website domain check and saw my website and my competitors website domains are hosted by the same domain registrar it’s because their is only one company in China to buy domain names from basically. It’s the domain name group called aliyuan. They are a subsidiary of the alibaba corporation.

I can go around and say I have a 12” dick and five Lamborghinis but that doesn’t make it true. What happened to America being the land of innocent until proven guilty. So how about throw some evidence up for everyone to see instead of just making a random smear thread that is probably working in accordance to some agenda you’re on
He is talking about VPN. VPN doesn't really apply to website.

So if you didn't click any links, either he's bullshitting, or he's using the user data obtained from the forum administration interface therefore severely breaking the trust of everybody using the forum.

Don't see any other possibility here - does anybody?

---

As much as it would be disgusting towards anybody on this forum if such data were kept and that he might have access to them (!) it's stupid to assume that it's definite proof that you use same VPN/hosting. So are 100 000 other people, as you have pointed out, and secure services have the way of attracting the same kind of ... users.


I don't really think you are panda, panda is too fucking cheap to purchase an HPLC, but who knows.
 
Look at this. 2 sources claiming foul.

@janoshik love how you have such a vested interest in both PPL and MK. Can't keep your opinions out of either thread, can you? Very telling.

To me it doesn't matter how he got the info regarding the SOURCE. Fuck that source. And I'm willing to bet Millard could also give 2 shits less considering the current state of affairs. Meso is here for members, not you two. Show me one occurance of CBS using data against a member and I'll retract my statements about not giving 2 shits. You can't though.

Try being here for the correct reasons, source.
 
Look at this. 2 sources claiming foul.

@janoshik love how you have such a vested interest in both PPL and MK. Can't keep your opinions out of either thread, can you? Very telling.

To me it doesn't matter how he got the info regarding the SOURCE. Fuck that source. And I'm willing to bet Millard could also give 2 shits less considering the current state of affairs. Meso is here for members, not you two. Show me one occurance of CBS using data against a member and I'll retract my statements about not giving 2 shits. You can't though.

Try being here for the correct reasons, source.
Yes, I'm keen of defending them (where exactly?) because I'm getting so much business there.
Which one do you think gives me more biz - the one, who gets testing done by Chink factories or the other one who apparently does it himself? If they are not the same.

1. If your sorry ass doesn't understand the security implications of such data merely existing for EVERYBODY, I feel sorry for you.
2. Betting anybody's security on the hope that somebody had not abused the power before sounds like a smart move.
3. So you are okay with rules only applying to people you don't like?

No need to answer - it's rhetorical. Your post is very telling as it is.

kkthxbb
 
This isnt the first time I've heard @CensoredBoardsSuck being accused of having mod powers and/or abusing mod powers. I assumed it was a ridiculous claim. I dunno.


From the underground rules:

(8) Threats of cyber-attack are prohibited.


How about actual cyber attacks?

Or is that rule taken as seriously as the no trolling rule?
 
1. If your sorry ass doesn't understand the security implications of such data merely existing for EVERYBODY, I feel sorry for you.
2. Betting anybody's security on the hope that somebody had not abused the power before sounds like a smart move.
3. So you are okay with rules only applying to people you don't like?
Jesus, you know maybe some of this would matter if it wasn't revolving around a source. Have you made a conscious effort to be obtuse or are you really that slow? You do understand what Meso is here for? You have zero clue as to how that information was accessed so keep the "safety of the meso members" rhetoric to a minimum. Also, The rules apply to people I don't like as much as they apply to the ones that I do like but one important fact is being avoided when you ask that question: You're defending a source! But that's your thing because it makes you money. Sources don't get the same treatment as members. Haven't noticed that yet?

Yes, I'm keen of defending them because I'm getting so much business there.
exactly. And the biggest reason that anything you post to Meso should be thrown out with the trash. You have a vested financial interest which makes you completely untrustworthy. Well, a case could be made that you're not trustworthy due to lying about testing a members gear. Lol, we can leave that alone for now though.

Your post is very telling as it is
you're damn right my post is very telling. It illustrates my feelings towards sources and how I feel about their security. If they are as vulnerable as PPL and MK I'd say they're a fucking joke. The clock is ticking for PPL and they know it, hence MK.

(8) Threats of cyber-attack are prohibited.
reading available information (which is what CBS has been accused of in this case) is a far cry from a cyber attack. Ddos or something of the like would be a cyber attack.
 
Back
Top