Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

Oh I forgot to mention the weirdest part. This was a domestic order & it arrived with “inspected by customs” tape.

Yeah.. no idea what they were trying to do but no thanks.
That's the reason why i will never make an order directly from china, bcuz in my home country the rules are much harder then other countrys.
But u do it, right @Eisenbeiser ? U must have big balls or a good drop. :p
 
There’s already three of us that have come forward in just this small span of time. Each of us were asked to commit crimes and given the full personal details of the other person who ordered due to QSC making a dumb mistake where they should eat the cost of it as a business. It’s ridiculous at best.

Commit crimes! It’s been said a million times the shipment wasn’t illegal. Let’s see the screenshots and proof of the other two cases and what those shipments were. Let us have all the info. If we’re going to resort to hysterics, might as well get us all hysterical.

Edit to add, and if the proof isn’t 100% that they were asked to “commit crimes”, these allegations should be investigated.
 
Aaaah, right. Sorry, hard day @ work.
That makes really nervous.
You missed the part where I said it was a US domestic order. From their US warehouse.

CBP cannot open packages that aren't crossing a border, period. They wouldn't even have the opportunity to get their hands on it.

So that leaves a couple of possibilities. The "US Warehouse" had your package shipped internationally and forwarded it to you without removing the CBP tape. If a single item they may have done this in advance as part of their stock.

The package tape said "Resealed within U.S.P.S.". Few people know the post office can open any package that's not Priority Mail or Express to check for compliance with regulations. The Postal Inspector branch of the PO can also open any package they have suspicion contains illegal goods. Both will be sealed with that tape. Also used to close up damaged parcels that are in USPS possession.
 
Commit crimes! It’s been said a million times the shipment wasn’t illegal. Let’s see the screenshots and proof of the other two cases and what those shipments were. Let us have all the info. If we’re going to resort to hysterics, might as well get us all hysterical.

Edit to add, and if the proof isn’t 100% that they were asked to “commit crimes”, these allegations should be investigated.

Just because QSC says it's "legal peptides" when demanding you to re-ship a pack for them doesn't mean it's true. They stated it was "legal peptides" which was not true. It was a drug that requires a prescription, which would be distribution of a controlled dangerous substance in my locale. I'm lucky that I knew what it was based on the coloring.

I'm not risking my livelihood over someone else's inability to apply the correct label to a package and it's laughable at best that this behavior is being defended.
 
Last edited:
Just because QSC says it's "legal peptides" when demanding you to re-ship a pack for them doesn't mean it's true. They stated it was "legal peptides" which was not true. It was a drug that requires a prescription, which would be distribution of a controlled dangerous substance in my locale. I'm lucky that I knew what it was based on the coloring.

I'm not risking my livelihood over someone else's inability to properly attach labels to packages and it's laughable at best that this behavior is being defended.

Which of those peptides is a prescription drug?

What locale considers non-scheduled drugs "controlled dangerous substances"?

That's not the case anywhere in North America or anywhere in the first world.

Meanwhile you're having Test E shipped into the country, a federal Schedule III Controlled Substance right up there with Codeine and Ketamine, which technically makes you liable to drug trafficking charges from the feds.

(PS Though of course we know from countless seizure letters, the authorities have no interest in prosecuting personal use amounts, ever. But they could if they wanted to.)
 
Last edited:
Just because QSC says it's "legal peptides" when demanding you to re-ship a pack for them doesn't mean it's true. They stated it was "legal peptides" which was not true. It was a drug that requires a prescription, which would be distribution of a controlled dangerous substance in my locale. I'm lucky that I knew what it was based on the coloring.

I'm not risking my livelihood over someone else's inability to apply the correct label to a package and it's laughable at best that this behavior is being defended.
Most peptides are not proscribed and are therefore not illegal. There are however illegal peptides. I would have loved the victim post more of the exchange. Even the Jano scammer more pics even though fake. It helps get some arguments and semantics out of the way.

I also would not ship any thing like Gear, no matter how secure the assurances. Except if QSC arranges a pick-up themselves.. like remote work companies do for fired employees.
 
Most peptides are are not proscribed and are therefore not illegal. There are however illegal peptides. I would have loved the victim post more more of the exchange. Even the Jano scammer more pics even though fake. It helps get some arguments and semantics out of the way.

I also would not ship any thing like Gear, no matter how secure the assurances. Except if QSC arranges a pick-up themselves.. like remote work companies do for fired employees.

I would have QSCs crystal clear email that this was sent in error and return it directly to them, at their expense. Customs forms have a specific category for "returned goods". I would not send it to a third party. It's not legal to send peptides for human consumption to anyone. That's why the "for research use only" is on many peptides.

Or better yet, if I were QSC, like I said, I'd just do the same as if it was a seized or lost package, call it a loss, and make it a "gift" to the customer.
 
Last edited:
No one has mentioned that whatever anonymity that the purchaser has when getting items shipped to them, they’d also have in shipping out. I don’t know about USPS, but FedEx and Purolator don’t require ID to ship a package. You can create shipments online and drop off at various locations. Ship it out using Tits McGee as the name and send QSC the tracking #.

The OP also said it was “peptides and raw powder”, correct me if I’m wrong but BPC157 & TB500, aren’t considered “raw powders” by these standards, and aren’t listed as such on the product list. That’s a huge factor .

I don’t have a dog in this fight, but that’s worth noting.

None of that is true. You might be too young to remember the Unabomber, but there's no way to ship something anonymously after that guy.
 
None of that is true. You might be too young to remember the Unabomber, but there's no way to ship something anonymously after that guy.

Unlike the "anonymity" you have receiving packages? Go to the legal section and read about the New Hampshire lab bust. They had records of EVERY international shipment, including tiny boxes, going to him for years BEFORE they were investigating him. They only pulled those records once he was discovered to be operating a big lab.

Meanwhile, I've never had to present ID to send a package at the PO. And you can pay in cash. If you think the authorities are going to do a "unabomber" investigation to find you for sending that box, even if it contained fentanyl, you're insane.

If they don't like something in it, it'll be confiscated. That's it. That's all they ever do. Plenty here can attest to that.
 
Last edited:
Unlike the "anonymity" you have receiving packages? Go to the legal section and read about the New Hampshire lab bust. They had records of EVERY international shipment, including tiny boxes, going to him for years BEFORE they were investigating him.

Meanwhile, I've never had to present ID to send a package at the PO. And you can pay in cash. If you think the authorities are going to do a "unabomber" investigation to find you for sending that box, even if it contained fentanyl, you're insane.

Let's face it , it's all pseudoanonymity.
You're only anonymous because no one is looking.

I"m saying that the unabomber changed postal regulations so that you can't use stamps to send a package. In other words there is something that identifies you as sending that package, whether it's your ugly mug on the camera at the PO or the credit card you use online (usps.com even required a social)
 
Let's face it , it's all pseudoanonymity.
You're only anonymous because no one is looking.

I"m saying that the unabomber changed postal regulations so that you can't use stamps to send a package. In other words there is something that identifies you as sending that package, whether it's your ugly mug on the camera at the PO or the credit card you use online (usps.com even required a social)

You're absolutely right, they definitely made true anonymity impossible. It's just "real risk" vs theory. They say we all break 5 federal laws a day. And most are breaking far worse ones than whatever peptides might be violating.

That said, again, QSC shouldn't want any of the action coming his way either. What would he have done if it was confiscated? Reship it. That's what he should've done here once the customer said they weren't comfortable reshipping to a third party.
 
Back
Top