Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

Is anyone here an admin on the PepChat page or know how to contact one? All the 'mods' shown are bots, and the 1 can message returned an error message. I can't read General Chit Chat or any of the pages where you can comment. I can click different options but nothing is there. Not sure what happened to my account or how to get it fixed.
 
Is anyone here an admin on the PepChat page or know how to contact one? All the 'mods' shown are bots, and the 1 can message returned an error message. I can't read General Chit Chat or any of the pages where you can comment. I can click different options but nothing is there. Not sure what happened to my account or how to get it fixed.
I think QSC chit chat got closed a while ago, though see if you can still comment in the testing section. As for the PepChat admin, you really just need tech support. Go into that tab and thebionaut usually responds.
 
I think QSC chit chat got closed a while ago, though see if you can still comment in the testing section. As for the PepChat admin, you really just need tech support. Go into that tab and thebionaut usually responds.
I don't see anything in Group Buy Testing either.
 
I'm just saying that you're asking about a peptide stack and the best place to get that information is in the Growth Hormone and Peptide section of the board. There are a number of people who won't venture into this vendor thread but who post over there, and they might just have the information you're looking for.

Hell, you might even try using the Search function of the board to answer your question rather than the abysmally low effort you've put in.

But... you do you.
 
This whole thread should be submitted for a case study

Might as well be a separate forum. Most/many customers in this thread surely don't respect the core values Millard laid out very clearly.

First of all, MESO-Rx is not a source board that exists to connect you with a source. MESO-Rx is a harm reduction forum for AAS. The MESO community values harm reduction first and foremost.

MESO-Rx seeks to discourage New Members who seem intent on pursuing loyalty to the source over loyalty to the harm reduction community.


That many of the members in this thread find it acceptable or amusing for a vendor to attack a member with impunity is a joke.

One more time for you readers...

Contrary to the prevailing sentiment in a few source threads, this forum does NOT exist so members can bow down, kiss the ring, and promote/defend the sources (from "a business owners (sic) perspective") against customer criticisms of their products/services.

Yes, Millard was talking to you QSC faithful. Since you love clowns, All Together Now...




Mr Rogers Clown GIF
 
Last edited:
That many of the members in this thread find it acceptable or amusing for a vendor to attack a member with impunity is a joke.
But it’ll be a different story if / as & when they’re on the receiving end.

Don’t get me wrong, I abhorred the “old Meso” culture that thought it was cool & entertaining for members to attack vendors here (often racially) just for the sake of it (& to make the member look “badass”), but they absolutely had it right with their “one for all & all for one” mentality with regards to vendors attacking / mocking / insulting members.

@Millard - thoughts on removing vendors ability to receive likes on their posts? At the very least it would force members who wish to condone such aggressive behaviour by sources against members to physically post their support & thus leave them open to highlighting & criticism of their words of support for those vendors & potentially being held to account for it / justify their words & actions.

Just a suggestion mate.
 
This whole thread should be submitted for a case study. Such vast psychological phenomenons appearing here, I’m truly in awe.

We possibly have Moral Disengagement as one, followed by;

-Cognitive dissonance
-Social Influence & peer pressure
-Sunk Cost Fallacy
-Familiarity Bias
-Herd mentality

So many others to list… truly astonishing, really. I mean cheap stuff is attractive, but this, this is truly an exaggeration of the definition in itself.
This is just typical of any social media thread.
Even the Comments section of a Lakers story on The Athletic will read exactly the same, but with more language moderation
 
But it’ll be a different story if / as & when they’re on the receiving end.

Don’t get me wrong, I abhorred the “old Meso” culture that thought it was cool & entertaining for members to attack vendors here (often racially) just for the sake of it (& to make the member look “badass”), but they absolutely had it right with their “one for all & all for one” mentality with regards to vendors attacking / mocking / insulting members.

@Millard - thoughts on removing vendors ability to receive likes on their posts? At the very least it would force members who wish to condone such aggressive behaviour by sources against members to physically post their support & thus leave them open to highlighting & criticism of their words of support for those vendors & potentially being held to account for it / justify their words & actions.

Just a suggestion mate.

Who the fuck are you to "hold someone to account" for their reaction to a comment?

This is the mindset of leftist trash who, while mouthing support of free expression, insist anonymous speech must be banned, so that "consequences" can be imposed,

No one is forced to participate in this thread, or do business with this vendor.

Let the comments fly and the chips fall where they may. Better to let everyone reveal what that think, and others can govern their decisions accordingly.

Screw you and your censorship by mob intimidation.
 
Last edited:
No one is forced to participate in this thread, or do business with this vendor.

That is not what this is about.

It's about members objecting and acting together against

find it acceptable or amusing for a vendor to attack a member with impunity is a joke.

Nothing to do with censorship.
You read what he wrote the way you wanted, not the way it was meant.
Members would have to write and justify (without having "reactions") why they support such behaviour by a vendor.

Do you think that what the source wrote to Rek, who only tagged the owner after Bubba and I replied about spamming threads (the owner does not approve, see above) is what should be expected and enjoyed by members, here?
Attacked with ad hominem, ghastly insults by a vendor just for highlighting the right thing?

You are always the first one to cry against criticism of a personal nature, when aimed at you.
This time, though, since it was aimed at someone else, you do not seem open to acknowledging that unacceptable behaviour should meet consequences.

You may not like the idea.

But you manipulated the hell out of what @Zebedee has posted.
 
Who the fuck are you to "hold someone to account" for their reaction to a comment?

You actually understood what the fuck he wrote?
This is the mindset of leftist trash

You lost me here. Keep your political bias or whatever. This is a forum owned by somebody, free speech doesn't exist here.

That aside, the premise is idiotic. The fact that this forum exists for the purposes of harm reduction and that vendors should be held accountable doesn't mean that anyone has to be nice to idiots.

Sure, QSC and Tracy should be held accountable for their customer service and their behavior. It's on display for everyone to see. Don't like it, don't buy from 'em. There's the accountability. Hell, the customer service is one of the things that I value most about QSC. I'd rather do business with someone as transparent as Tracy is about everything, including his feelings about idiotic customers. I'd even pay a premium for it.
 
Who the fuck are you to "hold someone to account" for their reaction to a comment?

This is the mindset of leftist trash who, while mouthing support of free expression, insist anonymous speech must be banned, so that "consequences" can be imposed,

No one is forced to participate in this thread, or do business with this vendor.

Let the comments fly and the chips fall where they may. Better to let everyone reveal what that think, and others can govern their decisions accordingly.

Screw you and your censorship by mob intimidation.
Well said. It seems to be those far left types that want to live in their pillow built fort and force everyone into their belief system and delusions. Everyone must cater to them so they don’t feel offended, Which everything offends them but they’re ashamed of nothing. I’ve lost count how many times I’ve seen this guy tag Millard asking him to further cater the forum to his personal needs.
 
Santa peptides promo

US domestic promo items:

CAG10 : Cagrilintide 10mg $160/kit
MZ10 : Mazdutide 10mg $150/kit
NASX30 : NA semax amidate 30mg $70/kit
SX10 : Semax 10mg $50/kit
SK10 : Selank 10mg $50/kit
SS50 : SS31 50mg $280/kit
M2-10 : MT2 10mg $45/kit
M1-10 : MT1 10mg $45/kit
CJN10 : Cjc no dac 10mg $130/kit
LL10 : LL37 10mg $130/kit
G2-10 : GHRP2 10mg $30/kit
FOX10 : FOX04-DRI 10mg $290/kit

NB: SKU (Cag10, mz10 , sx10 etc...) are next to bar codes for the US domestic items, please distinguish your kits carefully and do not mix them.

--- US domestic shipping cost: $10

International promo items:

Tesa/ipa 10mg+5mg blend $130/kit
Ipamorelin 10mg $37/kit
CJC-1295 DAC 10mg $165/kit
Thymosin Alpha 1 5mg $65/kit
MT2 10mg $35/kit
GHRP6 10mg $30/kit
Kisspeptin-10 8mg $65/kit
Sermorelin 2mg $30/kit
GHK CU 75mg $30/kit
IGF LR3 1mg $120/kit
Mots-c 20mg $90/kit
semax 40mg $65/kit
Semaglutide 20mg $120/kit
Epithalon 10mg $28/kit

---- International shipping cost: Shipping is charged based on the weight and no MOQ

Deadline: Saturday 14th december

Accepted payment methods: Bank transfer (USD), Bitcoin, USDT, USDC, ETH

How to order?
‌‎
sigma@sigmachemical.com.cn
Whatsapp: +86 16503300980

Ordering form:

List of items you want:
Email:
Name:
Shipping address (including city, state and zip code):
Phone number:
Preferred payment method:
 
Back
Top