That is not what this is about.
It's about members objecting and acting together against
Nothing to do with censorship.
You read what he wrote the way you wanted, not the way it was meant.
Members would have to write and justify (without having "reactions") why they support such behaviour by a vendor.
Do you think that what the source wrote to Rek, who only tagged the owner after Bubba and I replied about spamming threads (the owner does not approve, see above) is what should be expected and enjoyed by members, here?
Attacked with ad hominem, ghastly insults by a vendor just for highlighting the right thing?
You are always the first one to cry against criticism of a personal nature, when aimed at you.
This time, though, since it was aimed at someone else, you do not seem open to acknowledging that unacceptable behaviour should meet consequences.
You may not like the idea.
But you manipulated the hell out of what
@Zebedee has posted.