Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

View attachment 309506


Key phrase. Without this, no action could've been taken. They're not controlled substances. That's why places like Peptide Science doesn't have this problem and hasn't for over a decade. They're not sloppy. Hell, they're insanely paranoid about avoiding the slightest hint of "human use".

You can buy urea by the ton. Make a prescription strength foot cream out of it and start marketing it as a cure for dry skin, and now it's "for human use" and the FDA can respond. You can buy Ivermectin for your livestock. no prescription required. Offer it for people and once again the line has been crossed.

Yip... The usual, overly-confident slop moves with inappropriate language use.

(I re-read your post and see you used "sloppy" as well to describe it. ahhh lol.)

I guess it is just too much to ask for people to play it cool.
 
Because there are retards who will go and pick up illegal shit and make it that much easier for them.

You ever heard of undercovers? Setups? Where they set up operations and have you walk right into the trap?

Not every drug bust is a SWAT team raid.

Are you really trying to disagree with me that it's unwise to pick up controlled substances from a federal building? Don't really know what to say if that's the case. Hopefully you just want to argue for the sake of arguing- I understand that a lot more.

The nightmare scenario has always been a leaking package. It give the postal inspectors the right to open a package without a warrant, and it's one of the few scenarios we know often leads to prosecution.

So when you (strangely, noticeably) refuse to pick up a package addressed to you,. it'll get sent to the return address.

Which is a fake address.

Then it'll head to the "Mail Recovery Center".

Where the law says it can be opened.

And your illegal drugs will be in the possession of the Postal Inspectors, and they can take it from there, just as if they discovered a leaking package.

Genius.

Play chess, not checkers,
 
The nightmare scenario has always been a leaking package. It give the postal inspectors the right to open a package without a warrant, and it's one of the few scenarios we know often leads to prosecution.

So when you (strangely, noticeably) refuse to pick up a package addressed to you,. it'll get sent to the return address.

Which is a fake address.

Then it'll head to the "Mail Recovery Center".

Where the law says it can be opened.

And your illegal drugs will be in the possession of the Postal Inspectors, and they can take it from there, just as if they discovered a leaking package.

Genius.

Play chess, not checkers,
But at that point, they can't prove it was your mail. Especially with this stuff...they don't really care about gear.
 
The nightmare scenario has always been a leaking package. It give the postal inspectors the right to open a package without a warrant, and it's one of the few scenarios we know often leads to prosecution.

So when you (strangely, noticeably) refuse to pick up a package addressed to you,. it'll get sent to the return address.

Which is a fake address.

Then it'll head to the "Mail Recovery Center".

Where the law says it can be opened.

And your illegal drugs will be in the possession of the Postal Inspectors, and they can take it from there, just as if they discovered a leaking package.

Genius.

Play chess, not checkers,
Some of those return addresses aren't fake addresses. Some are "package warehouses" i.e some folks looking to make extra bucks on the side, and reship imported stuff. They stick the final labels on all these Yun or Yan labels..
 
It has nothing to do with "super duper scanners". 99% of packs are never scanned. It has to do with whether a container is selected for inspection based on the electronic data sent in advance of its arrival.

Do you really think nothing will change?

That it's simply impossible for US customs to tighten down to the same level as other countries? That's why there are "no reship" countries. What's happened over the last few years with packs from China to the US is an anomaly, It wasn't like this at all 10 years ago.
In time we'll find out.
 
What do you mean by feedback? If you’re talking about testing, Tracy already posted the Jano report in the HPLC thread.....Get some, have it tested.
Having it tested yourself is the only thing you can do to assure quality. He has admitted that his testing is only for marketing and what he ships you may not be the same product he is linking to his price list. It is about the perception you are getting the same batch he has linked to. He would rather link a batch that is not current than not at all. But since we know that, the solution is simple. Test your own shit.
 
Having it tested yourself is the only thing you can do to assure quality. He has admitted that his testing is only for marketing and what he ships you may not be the same product he is linking to his price list. It is about the perception you are getting the same batch he has linked to. He would rather link a batch that is not current than not at all. But since we know that, the solution is simple. Test your own shit.
Understood. I’m waiting for Jano to reply to get the ball rolling and report back here once I get results.
 
Back
Top