Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

@Ghoul Do you think QSC will come back?

Not in any way that'll result in existing orders being filled, or dealing in AAS at all.

Stanford gave a very stark assessment based on his contacts. Things in China aren't "loosening up" any time soon, and it's only a matter of time before the shipping situation gets worse,

The business model for PEDs will change significantly from the way it is now.

What that looks like, whether it works for QSC and the domestic warehouses they established (probably in anticipation of all this) who knows.

For now, it's time for all of us to sit back and bask in our ample stocks we built up in the months leading to this.
 
Last edited:
So, who are y’all using now that qsc decided to step back from whatever heat he’s in. I’ve only used QSC so all my testing $500 worth went up in smoke… as It means nothing now.
 
I've already written them off, this is just me trying to understand the process...For the packages that a lot of us still have sitting in Customs, what are they waiting for?

Is it just a matter of volume? Or are they waiting for clarification from the sender, QSC, who can no longer respond. If that's the case, what now?
 
Not the best Quality? You forgot the last batch of oils they tested?

Since i was customer of QSC (Spring 2024) I had around 20 Kits of Oils and about 25 kits of GH, and a handful of other Peptid kits.

One Oil vial was broken and they sent me a replacement in the next order.
One vial of those 200 had visible floaters.

The price-quality ratio from them was the best.
I’m just saying I have had much better oils from other places. But when you factor in price it’s hard to beat QSC. Nice oils are nice. But often times I don’t want to pay 8 x markup. Sometimes I will though. Sometimes it’s worth it.
 
Fantastic antidote to "Tracy". Thank you!
"Lucky you were born that far away so
We could both make fun of distance
Lucky that I love a foreign land for
The lucky fact of your existence
Baby, I would climb the Andes solely
To count the freckles on your body
Never could imagine there were only
Ten million ways to love somebody"

I'm so terribly sorry to inform you, that that was another Tracy joke.

But there isn't much better than 2001 Shakira.
 
"Lucky you were born that far away so
We could both make fun of distance
Lucky that I love a foreign land for
The lucky fact of your existence
Baby, I would climb the Andes solely
To count the freckles on your body
Never could imagine there were only
Ten million ways to love somebody"

I'm so terribly sorry to inform you, that that was another Tracy joke.

But there isn't much better than 2001 Shakira.
No worries. Happy to stay willfully ignorant on that one. :)
 
One of the current dramas in the peptide world is how a seller got their hands on this peptide everyone wanted, but no one else was willing to sell. Turns out it's because it degrades so terribly in transportation, and anyone who'd done any amount of research should have realized this. Instead everyone is out money and everyone's pissed about it.

Sometimes there's no researching happening at all, just "this person I see posting a lot says it's great, so now I want to try it!"
If it is about Humanin, this isn't completely accurate. We've been on this Humanin issue forever. Vendors have gotten the other Mitochondrial peps bang on. Humanin on the other hand, we don't know if it is the synthesis, or it is the Testing. Domestic labs return test with higher purity and quantity than Jano. Vendors that test little quantity but high purity with Jano would sometimes test High quantity but dodgy purity with Jano. One vendor tested decently (both Jano and Prime) and I bought a batch of Humanin from them. It might have been the worst humanin in the market. Left me with itchy welts the size of Texas. I simply gave up on Humanin, especially after moving beyond all the touted anti-aging and cardioprotective benefits to see that the pathway to these benefits might(or actually) involve(s) a lowering of IGF-1 (reduced IGF being a marker of longer life).
A lot of the things we know about non-glp UGL peptides do not arise from the 'peptide world' if peptide world refers to what some derogatorily refer to as 'karen glp moms'.
Health buffs have been injecting peptides and chems way before the GLP folks entered the game. I doubt it was the typical GLP user data that prominent figures like Dr Seeds and Khavinson used to generate their protocols.
So while i would criticize someone whose protocol is 23 peptides, it's from people like that I gather info on what is bad, what's probably placebo and what negates what :D.
There are many things we don't have enough info on as pharma either gave up on, or used different parameters for. There are even things folks use that are untested in humans, and we have used pharma principles to calculate their human equivalent doses, and gone ahead to use/test. We need as much anecdotal info for some things as much as possible albeit obtained as safely as possible.
 
If it is about Humanin, this isn't completely accurate. We've been on this Humanin issue forever. Vendors have gotten the other Mitochondrial peps bang on. Humanin on the other hand, we don't know if it is the synthesis, or it is the Testing. Domestic labs return test with higher purity and quantity than Jano. Vendors that test little quantity but high purity with Jano would sometimes test High quantity but dodgy purity with Jano. One vendor tested decently (both Jano and Prime) and I bought a batch of Humanin from them. It might have been the worst humanin in the market. Left me with itchy welts the size of Texas. I simply gave up on Humanin, especially after moving beyond all the touted anti-aging and cardioprotective benefits to see that the pathway to these benefits might(or actually) involve(s) a lowering of IGF-1 (reduced IGF being a marker of longer life).
A lot of the things we know about non-glp UGL peptides do not arise from the 'peptide world' if peptide world refers to what some derogatorily refer to as 'karen glp moms'.
Health buffs have been injecting peptides and chems way before the GLP folks entered the game. I doubt it was the typical GLP user data that prominent figures like Dr Seeds and Khavinson used to generate their protocols.
So while i would criticize someone whose protocol is 23 peptides, it's from people like that I gather info on what is bad, what's probably placebo and what negates what :D.
There are many things we don't have enough info on as pharma either gave up on, or used different parameters for. There are even things folks use that are untested in humans, and we have used pharma principles to calculate their human equivalent doses, and gone ahead to use/test. We need as much anecdotal info for some things as much as possible albeit obtained as safely as possible.
Thank you for being more informed than I and providing further context! I was being less than precise, because I was not one of the people involved in the whole ordeal, I've just been watching the fallout. I myself am new to all of this, and sometimes speak with an air of authority I should not. (Should I post the Dunning-Kruger effect again? It's very accurate.)

I'm sure most here would consider me an annoying Karen GLP mom, despite not being a mom (and trying not to be a Karen.) I can do nothing about how annoying I am, alas.

The Jano/ domestic testing discrepancies is another one I'm keeping my eye on. I'm very interested to see if we ever find out why. I'm way too new at this to have an informed guess.
 

Sponsors

Back
Top