MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic
- Thread starter Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
- Start date
BamaCrazy
New Member
I’m milking my GH like the Lobster. No filters needed.
Ghoul
Member
Not in any way that'll result in existing orders being filled, or dealing in AAS at all.
Stanford gave a very stark assessment based on his contacts. Things in China aren't "loosening up" any time soon, and it's only a matter of time before the shipping situation gets worse,
The business model for PEDs will change significantly from the way it is now.
What that looks like, whether it works for QSC and the domestic warehouses they established (probably in anticipation of all this) who knows.
For now, it's time for all of us to sit back and bask in our ample stocks we built up in the months leading to this.
Last edited:
R
readalot
Guest
Honestly, define they.
Can't we all just move on at this point? I'm certainly willing.
These terms aren't going to ever help bring this community together or forward constructively.
Last edited by a moderator:
CamCamthePowerMan
New Member
I have had a couple floaters. I assume from the rubberized seal. But my dumbass would just make sure to tilt vial upside down for solid minute to insure everything settles to the bottom before extraction
CamCamthePowerMan
New Member
So, who are y’all using now that qsc decided to step back from whatever heat he’s in. I’ve only used QSC so all my testing $500 worth went up in smoke… as It means nothing now.
Ghoul
Member
For what? There's no one stop shop any more.
SkeetSlambone
New Member
I've already written them off, this is just me trying to understand the process...For the packages that a lot of us still have sitting in Customs, what are they waiting for?
Is it just a matter of volume? Or are they waiting for clarification from the sender, QSC, who can no longer respond. If that's the case, what now?
Is it just a matter of volume? Or are they waiting for clarification from the sender, QSC, who can no longer respond. If that's the case, what now?
I’m just saying I have had much better oils from other places. But when you factor in price it’s hard to beat QSC. Nice oils are nice. But often times I don’t want to pay 8 x markup. Sometimes I will though. Sometimes it’s worth it.
R
readalot
Guest
Fantastic antidote to "Tracy". Thank you!
chmuse
Member
"Lucky you were born that far away so
We could both make fun of distance
Lucky that I love a foreign land for
The lucky fact of your existence
Baby, I would climb the Andes solely
To count the freckles on your body
Never could imagine there were only
Ten million ways to love somebody"
I'm so terribly sorry to inform you, that that was another Tracy joke.
But there isn't much better than 2001 Shakira.
R
readalot
Guest
No worries. Happy to stay willfully ignorant on that one.
If it is about Humanin, this isn't completely accurate. We've been on this Humanin issue forever. Vendors have gotten the other Mitochondrial peps bang on. Humanin on the other hand, we don't know if it is the synthesis, or it is the Testing. Domestic labs return test with higher purity and quantity than Jano. Vendors that test little quantity but high purity with Jano would sometimes test High quantity but dodgy purity with Jano. One vendor tested decently (both Jano and Prime) and I bought a batch of Humanin from them. It might have been the worst humanin in the market. Left me with itchy welts the size of Texas. I simply gave up on Humanin, especially after moving beyond all the touted anti-aging and cardioprotective benefits to see that the pathway to these benefits might(or actually) involve(s) a lowering of IGF-1 (reduced IGF being a marker of longer life).
A lot of the things we know about non-glp UGL peptides do not arise from the 'peptide world' if peptide world refers to what some derogatorily refer to as 'karen glp moms'.
Health buffs have been injecting peptides and chems way before the GLP folks entered the game. I doubt it was the typical GLP user data that prominent figures like Dr Seeds and Khavinson used to generate their protocols.
So while i would criticize someone whose protocol is 23 peptides, it's from people like that I gather info on what is bad, what's probably placebo and what negates what
.There are many things we don't have enough info on as pharma either gave up on, or used different parameters for. There are even things folks use that are untested in humans, and we have used pharma principles to calculate their human equivalent doses, and gone ahead to use/test. We need as much anecdotal info for some things as much as possible albeit obtained as safely as possible.
chmuse
Member
Just remember: you're in on the jokeNo worries. Happy to stay willfully ignorant on that one.
Also, I mean. 2001 Shakira. I assume most won't be complaining.
chmuse
Member
Thank you for being more informed than I and providing further context! I was being less than precise, because I was not one of the people involved in the whole ordeal, I've just been watching the fallout. I myself am new to all of this, and sometimes speak with an air of authority I should not. (Should I post the Dunning-Kruger effect again? It's very accurate.)If it is about Humanin, this isn't completely accurate. We've been on this Humanin issue forever. Vendors have gotten the other Mitochondrial peps bang on. Humanin on the other hand, we don't know if it is the synthesis, or it is the Testing. Domestic labs return test with higher purity and quantity than Jano. Vendors that test little quantity but high purity with Jano would sometimes test High quantity but dodgy purity with Jano. One vendor tested decently (both Jano and Prime) and I bought a batch of Humanin from them. It might have been the worst humanin in the market. Left me with itchy welts the size of Texas. I simply gave up on Humanin, especially after moving beyond all the touted anti-aging and cardioprotective benefits to see that the pathway to these benefits might(or actually) involve(s) a lowering of IGF-1 (reduced IGF being a marker of longer life).
A lot of the things we know about non-glp UGL peptides do not arise from the 'peptide world' if peptide world refers to what some derogatorily refer to as 'karen glp moms'.
Health buffs have been injecting peptides and chems way before the GLP folks entered the game. I doubt it was the typical GLP user data that prominent figures like Dr Seeds and Khavinson used to generate their protocols.
So while i would criticize someone whose protocol is 23 peptides, it's from people like that I gather info on what is bad, what's probably placebo and what negates what
There are many things we don't have enough info on as pharma either gave up on, or used different parameters for. There are even things folks use that are untested in humans, and we have used pharma principles to calculate their human equivalent doses, and gone ahead to use/test. We need as much anecdotal info for some things as much as possible albeit obtained as safely as possible.
I'm sure most here would consider me an annoying Karen GLP mom, despite not being a mom (and trying not to be a Karen.) I can do nothing about how annoying I am, alas.
The Jano/ domestic testing discrepancies is another one I'm keeping my eye on. I'm very interested to see if we ever find out why. I'm way too new at this to have an informed guess.
R
readalot
Guest
glpfun
Member
Im on tonight and my hips don’t lie something something something
Proud_papa_pump
Member
Don’t think too much on it. It won’t move the packages. Just assume it’s all gone. Tracy and Q might come back in some fashion, but they might not. If you need something now, get a different vendor. There are some good ones still around. If you have a stockpile, use it. If deals pop up, grab what makes sense.
Similar threads
