Ghoul
Member
One of the current dramas in the peptide world is how a seller got their hands on this peptide everyone wanted, but no one else was willing to sell. Turns out it's because it degrades so terribly in transportation, and anyone who'd done any amount of research should have realized this. Instead everyone is out money and everyone's pissed about it.
Sometimes there's no researching happening at all, just "this person I see posting a lot says it's great, so now I want to try it!"
100%.
Every time I hear "fillers" (it's "excipient ingredients" and their presence or. lack thereof is nearly as important as the peptide) reminds me how little folks understand about all the things that matter besides a "purity" test, and that the other "impurity" 1-5% of stuff in that vial isn't wholesome flakes of angel dandruff.
Look up "peptide impurity characterization" and "peptide mapping" to get a handle on just how blind we are to what's being injected.
If I said: "Inject this, it's 99% the drug you need, and 1% a mix of millions of random drug molecules, that most of the time do nothing noticeable, but we don't really know what effect they'll have", who would go for that deal?
That's the major difference with pharma peptides. They know what the impurities are, and have to confirm they're harmless to the FDA. We get peptides with completely unknown, unexamined impurities.
I say this as someone who engages in this risk taking as well, but I try to minimize it where I can.


