@Qingdao Sigma Chemicals ,
You do have a point, not many labs share results when they are bad.
I think that's good and it shows you're transparent.
I do have a suggestion for you.
Let's talk about for example the Test Cyp.
In terms of price, I don't care that it's 20mg less. That's nothing in terms of price.
But I do care about the 20mg less because I don't know
why it is 20mg less.
You said it's not the raws, when it comes to Test Cyp,
I believe you on that. It's actually been tested by a member if I recall correctly and it was 98% pure or more. So I agree, it's not the raws.
But that still doesn't answer the question on what went wrong. I understand it's the brewer, but what exactly happened during the brewing process?
For example:
Is he not able to calculate things correctly? (this can be easily fixed, no problem)
Is he stealing raws? (this would mean he is not to be trusted with other things that matter)
Is there something wrong with the equipment? (this could lead to a big problem if let's say, it's not mixed/weighed/whatever properly, you could end up with a single very highly overdosed vial in the batch. That means that one person is going to get really unlucky and blow his heart out when he thinks he's doing a 1200mg cycle but it's actually triple that. This might be exaggerating a bit but you get my point.
Is he not capable of brewing? This would mean he might make mistakes in things like keeping things clean and sterile too. Which is a way bigger problem than 20mg less per vial. Worst case scenario someone gets an infection, or worse. Nobody is testing for microbial contamination so we have to trust the brewer. But again, can we trust him if he's making these simple mistakes?
This is just a friendly suggestion. I honestly think you are doing great with a lot of things, but this could use some improvement.