Questions needed: "Ask Bill Roberts" column

What does he think of the risk/reward (or cost/benefit) ratio of the SARMS - Ostarine, S-4, LGD 50156, MK-6077?

Oversupplementing - taurine/creatine/DAA/Vitamin-D - where is the point of diminishing returns?
 
I didn't know bill roberts was around here.I gotta get around the forum more.I've always enjoyed his work
 
I'd love to see him talk some about using compounds for the strength training athlete. There is a woeful lacking on stacks, training protocol and schedules on cycling for strength, not mass.

I guess basically, "What are more effective cycling and training regimens for the strength athlete vs. the body builder?"
 
I couldn't agree with you more, I train primarily for strength, so I try to use the more androgenic gear like Tren but Halotestin is usually fake so can't trust it.

I don't think short cycling with Tren (2 weeks) works very well for strength, especially 2 weeks on, unless I keep the gains while I am off, I will see. Last cycle I lost a lot of strength and it started at about week 3 in to my PCT. I think by the time you peak with the Tren you are coming off. Around day 8-10 I notice my strength starts to really pick up, so 4-6 days later I drop the stuff, it is a huge let down. I am currently on day 10 now, my squat is barely budging though it is getting easier to get in the bucket with the weight I was using b4 (I fear my squats b4 cycle were a bit too shallow). My Bench is going back up 2.5 lbs every workout, though the amount of volume is starting to fade as I increase weight. My shoulder press jumped a lot and strength and volume is increasing steadily. Deadlifts and Power Cleans I can't really comment on because there are less workouts with these exercises than the other muscle groups, however they have increased.

Now if I can maintain the strength gains and some of the volume over 4 weeks I would consider it a success. It seems to me Tren and Test Prop don't start hitting you hard enough until your about a week in. I think some of the orals work faster maybe that is why Bill recommends Tren/Dbol, the Dbol is a good kick start. Next time I will frontload too, that might speed things up too.
 
Awesome! Please keep the questions coming. I should note that the selected questions will not be answered here in this thread put will be posted on the main thinksteroids.com site. It may be several weeks or months down the road. Also, MESO can not guarantee that all questions will be answered.
 
Awesome! Please keep the questions coming. I should note that the selected questions will not be answered here in this thread put will be posted on the main thinksteroids.com site. It may be several weeks or months down the road. Also, MESO can not guarantee that all questions will be answered.

Good work bro. I love what you're doing with MESO. This is the go to site for all things anabolic! Keep up the good work Millard!
 
Hi Bill, im a powerlifter planning my first cycle, aiming for both size and strength increases. i was just wondering, if someone was going to do a cycle of testosterone enanthate at 500 mgs, a dbol kickstart at 25 mgs for four weeks, with hcg at 250x3 times a week, and aromasin as an anti-e what would be the best idea for recovery? i keep hearing to keep test e cycles long as they dont tend to kick in until week 6 or later. would i be better off keeping it to 8-10 and upping the doseage slightly and frontloading? or just doing 12 weeks as planned. i wanted to do 3 cycles of 8 weeks a year as per your reccomendations but it seems that would not work well with a long ester, is this true? sorry if this is the wrong place (and for the long question!)to ask but couldnt find any other way.
 
Just read the article on time between cycles. Since natural test level recovery is the main goal, what does that mean for guys on TRT who aren't looking for recovery? Is lipid normalization or RBC count the standard then? Obviously we need some time off but what are the milestones?
 
Just read the article on time between cycles. Since natural test level recovery is the main goal, what does that mean for guys on TRT who aren't looking for recovery? Is lipid normalization or RBC count the standard then? Obviously we need some time off but what are the milestones?
That's a great question -- that I don't think has been given much thought by most people. Labs are always a good idea. It never seems advisable to start a cycle when lab values are out of range. Some other things that may be relevant beyond time-on / time-off include total amount of AAS used per year.
 
Would like to see an article on Blast & Cruise, pros, cons, examples etc.

Research on "blast vs cruise" pros cons etc.

Sure no problem, I suspect we'll find that one next months edition of the NEFM, lol!

Goodness do you ever have A LOT to learn about what is required to have research approved.
 
Research on "blast vs cruise" pros cons etc.

Sure no problem, I suspect we'll find that one next months edition of the NEFM, lol!

Goodness do you ever have A LOT to learn about what is required to have research approved.
Not sure what that meant but was just interested in his take on it. Personally I've be on B&C for 18 months.
 
I would love to see some info about how the esters effect the drug.

For example, many users claim long-estered drugs like cypionate, enanthate, etc are best for a bulk. Whereas shorter esters are best for a cut. Why would this be? At the end of the day, minus the mg's lost due to the esters size, isn't it the same active ingredient?
 
A question for Bill: What do you find to be the most potent "hardening" compound pre contest. Ex. Trenbolone,drostanolone, stanozolol etc.
 
I would love to see some info about how the esters effect the drug.

For example, many users claim long-estered drugs like cypionate, enanthate, etc are best for a bulk. Whereas shorter esters are best for a cut. Why would this be? At the end of the day, minus the mg's lost due to the esters size, isn't it the same active ingredient?

Much like "enteric coated ASA" an ester ONLY effects the half life of an AAS compound. It should have essentially no impact on the efficacy of an anabolic agent providing equipotent doses of the parent compound are being compared.
 
Back
Top