Readalots Enhanced Testing

[Sampei]

Btw let's make a discord for anyone interested? Would be easier to coordinate for future testings etc

To keep results all organized and ideas as well

 

[MarkusLA]

As soon as you find something that fails these tests, you’ll get a ton of support.

Just doing the test helps keep everyone honest. If there is an incentive to cut a corner here and there or not be thorough..

 

[Vanargandar]

Btw let's make a discord for anyone interested? Would be easier to coordinate for future testings etc

To keep results all organized and ideas as well

Second this; creating a Discord for anyone interested in these enhanced testing discussions along with donating would help immensely. @readalot

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

I havn't gone through all the posts yet, so this may have already been addressed...

Someone correct me if I'm wrong. I believe vendors do HPLC testing per batch, whereas Readalot's "additional testing" is for vendor raws. These "additional tests" will capture endotoxins, etc. on vendor raws, thereby tests/results will be much less frequent.

Endotoxin tests can also be performed on AAS oils. In fact, I just send off a vial to be tested for endotoxins, based on the advice of Sir readalot.

 

[BigNoOne]

Just doing the test helps keep everyone honest. If there is an incentive to cut a corner here and there or not be thorough..

You guys don’t look at the endpoint though.

Right now, we hold UGLs accountable with HPLC testing.

UGL tests their raws for purity so they can accurately dose their products.

UGL makes and tests their product to confirm it’s the correct dose.

The customer can always send a blind sample of their own to be tested (hopefully reimbursed by the UGL with a testing incentive).

The results of the customers blind sample should match pretty closely to the UGL’s initial testing results.

How is @readalot ’s expanded testing going to be verifiable? Periodic spot testing costing $1,000s?