Readalots Enhanced Testing

[readalot]

I didn't think you were "going after" homebrewing.

I'm not. But they surely benefitted from the data shared and will benefit from any future inprovements to the raws supply.

 

[Grey Spartan]

You often faced extensive community opposition along with sources and their loyal sycophants at every step of the way.

I'm a humble knuckle dragger, for others like me:

sycophant /sĭk′ə-fənt, sī′kə-/

noun​

1. A person who attempts to gain advantage by flattering influential people or behaving in a servile manner.
2. An informer; a talebearer.
   Similar: informer talebearer
3. A base parasite; a mean or servile flatterer; especially, a flatterer of princes and great men.

 

[Dkland]

Just a though, you magnificent crusader: moonshine homebrewers don't adhere to FDA GRAS standard.

Go at 'em boi!

Damn Narta………
I haven’t drank in some time now but that comment has my redneck self wanting to go back up home and get some moonshine for Christmas……
Hahahaha

 

[BigNoOne]

Quoted for emphasis.

Lol. I’m sure reading that made you feel a little better.

For what it’s worth, I felt like a complete shithead after reading what dingdong sigma chemicrap wrote. Fuck them. Anyone that buys that cheap shit from the Walmart of sources doesn’t have common sense let alone the concern for what they put in their body.

There should be some standard of product so that these terrible sources can’t undercut the guys that do care.

The problem that I have with what you are doing is that it’s ELEVATING the standard for the guys that already care enough to do HPLP testing on everything. The bottom-feeders are the ones that need to elevate what they do. And eliminate the dumbfucks like @MuscleCandy that don’t even bother to test their raws.

The guys that run shop like a normal business will make decisions based on what the community values. If that includes “enhanced testing” then they’ll get behind it. You can’t FORCE them though because there’s a bunch of sources that don’t do the bare minimum.

 

[Vanargandar]

dingdong sigma chemicrap

The hilarity of any bickering that takes place on this forum, which at the end of the day means nothing, is that we all agree QSC is the worst of the worst and we all hate him/her/shim/they/xer equally.

EDIT: So bad that I'd rather buy from MuscleCandy if forced to pick one.

 

[Qingdao Sigma Chemicals]

is that we all (the clowns community) agree QSC is the worst of the worst and we all hate him/her/shim/they/xer equally.

EDIT: So bad that I'd rather buy from MuscleCandy if forced to pick one.

Someone's butt is hurt

 

[readalot]

Someone's butt is hurt

How many butts have you infected with your products Dick (formerly known as "Tracy")? Do you know or have you lost count? Did you ever start a count?

When will you start testing your injectable oils for sterility and even the most basic QC for floaters? 100% clean, right? LoL.

 

[readalot]

The hilarity of any bickering that takes place on this forum, which at the end of the day means nothing, is that we all agree QSC is the worst of the worst and we all hate him/her/shim/they/xer equally.

Not quite. You can see the two likes on that post. Live in infamy. Actually 3 now. Embarrassment.

 

[BigNoOne]

Not quite. You can see the two likes on that post. Live in infamy. Actually 3 now. Embarrassment.

Bruh, FIVE

 

[readalot]

Bruh, FIVE

Members who reacted to message #553

thinksteroids.com

3 likes on Dick's post.

The usual.

 

[FastBun]

Lol. I’m sure reading that made you feel a little better.

For what it’s worth, I felt like a complete shithead after reading what dingdong sigma chemicrap wrote. Fuck them. Anyone that buys that cheap shit from the Walmart of sources doesn’t have common sense let alone the concern for what they put in their body.

There should be some standard of product so that these terrible sources can’t undercut the guys that do care.

The problem that I have with what you are doing is that it’s ELEVATING the standard for the guys that already care enough to do HPLP testing on everything. The bottom-feeders are the ones that need to elevate what they do. And eliminate the dumbfucks like @MuscleCandy that don’t even bother to test their raws.

The guys that run shop like a normal business will make decisions based on what the community values. If that includes “enhanced testing” then they’ll get behind it. You can’t FORCE them though because there’s a bunch of sources that don’t do the bare minimum.

100% only domestic sources testing raws rn… Stan … opti

 

[Grey Spartan]

Members who reacted to message #553

thinksteroids.com

3 likes on Dick's post.

The usual.

LOL! So you now post who likes posts? What is your "harm reduction" motivation behind this?

 

[HereToTeachAndLearn]

IGNORE works well, but I can still see he is losing it. I pity his inability to remain calm and collected. He could accomplish so much more if he could. I would even be a financial supporter.

 

[iris]

LOL! So you now post who likes posts? What is your "harm reduction" motivation behind this?

Fine but what about sources coming here to insult members that don't even buy from them, just because they express their own opinion about what they sell?

 

[readalot]

LOL! So you now post who likes posts? What is your "harm reduction" motivation behind this?

What's the harm reduction motivation behind all the shit I received for simple questions I originally asked. Does every post I do have to be on harm reduction?

My posts above are pretty clear. I was responding to other comments re: the absurdity of members choosing the lowest bottom feeder on here over a member busting ass and $$$ to effect change.

 

[readalot]

What's the harm reduction motivation behind all the shit I received for simple questions I originally asked

Oh nevermind. I think someone already did.

This is important and relevant because the public-facing interactions (e.g. source criticism, feedback, and defending of sources) are accompanied by potentially significant conflicts of interests. It really could use a little asterisk to disclaim.

Some source threads probably have much higher number of secret resellers participating. For example, reseller clientele is probably a much larger percentage of the customer base for raws sources.

You can't always take everything at face value. It's not always what it seems.

That cleared it up. Thanks Millard. I'm losing money on this. I wonder if my detractors can say the same. Good ole COI. Got it. Thanks.

What's the percentage here that actually want to practice what Millard has been preaching?

"Hey, but what about my costs and cash flow?"

 

[BigNoOne]

That cleared it up. Thanks Millard. I'm losing money on this. I wonder if my detractors can say the same. Good ole COI. Got it. Thanks.

How much money did you spend already?

 

[readalot]

How much money did you spend already?

3k USD between the 3 projects.

 

[BigNoOne]

3k USD between the 3 projects.

How’s it add up to $3,000? I don’t see that in the analyses that were done. Metals should be less than $150, HPLC is around that. Jano didn’t cut you any deals? You should have negotiated with him. He must not see long-term value in this testing either or he would have comped you for bringing a ton of future business to him!

 

[iris]

How’s it add up to $3,000? I don’t see that in the analyses that were done. Metals should be less than $150, HPLC is around that. Jano didn’t cut you any deals? You should have negotiated with him. He must not see long-term value in this testing either or he would have comped you for bringing a ton of future business to him!

Why are you so spiteful?
What are you getting out of this, with this relentless campaign of bitchy remarks you keep throwing his way?

What exactly have YOU accomplished, in the time you have been here and/or the other forums you say you are a member of?

One can disagree with the methodology or ideas of what he is doing, but what you bring to the table with this you can explain to everyone who reads this crap.