narta
Member
Go back to the hole you came crawling outIt’s a thread with good intentions, but the tests were conducted by Jano, who was exposed a while ago, making them pretty much worthless
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Go back to the hole you came crawling outIt’s a thread with good intentions, but the tests were conducted by Jano, who was exposed a while ago, making them pretty much worthless
Jano, who was exposed a while ago, making them pretty much worthless
I have debated again and again that extended testing (that matters and it's in the realm of possibility) can't be standardized, simply because you don't have a UGL FDA equivalent authority.
Standards that are ENFORCED. We CAN'T enforce shit on UGLs, period
Expand please. I've vetted Jano's work and provided a review. How was Janoshik exposed? How does Janoshik fake a blinded test?It’s a thread with good intentions, but the tests were conducted by Jano, who was exposed a while ago, making them pretty much worthless
Unfortunately there isn’t a viable option that I can recommend for you but as I said after everything dirty jano did I simply wouldn’t trust anything from him.Right.
What is the alternative?
It would be great for you guys in the States to have someone you can rely on.
From what I have seen here, there is that Chromate lab, which has been inconsistent.
Idk why that is the case.
Idk if they can even test for everything.
That Chemtox lab, in France, idk if they only deal with businesses.
As for Analiza, once again there have been issues.
It's a shame.
It is not an easy arena to operate in.
So how would you go about using someone else to test your stuff?
Not test, at all?
With this opinion of Jano, surely you would refrain from engaging his services.
I see you are another ignorant idiot who I will promptly add to my IGNORE list.It is absolutely crazy you think qsc is on par with other ugls
Get tracy out your mouth, or stay on your knees for him i dont really care
Aww, its cute you think I care.I see you are another ignorant idiot who I will promptly add to my IGNORE list.
Merry Christmas!
I see you are another ignorant idiot who I will promptly add to my IGNORE list.
Merry Christmas!
You are crazy MFer! Merry Christmas you crazy man. Get your freak on.I see you are another ignorant idiot who I will promptly add to my IGNORE list.
Merry Christmas!
Enter competitor in place of customer.Vendor tests, customer tests. Valid check on the vendor's process. No different than HPLC.
So HPLC analysis of AAS raws and finished oils was doomed from the start? Seems to have worked out ok here.Enter competitor in place of customer.
i think the admin should ban the shills because readalots discussions are always subverted by bad actors
I've fallen way behind on this thread and I'm outta time for the AM... @readalot wantedOpportunity to Help Out
There's no problem other than the fact we can order scheduled compounds from European Authorities with one click - last time we ordered scheduled compound from the US I gave up after two months and countless hours spent.
Different vendors have different requirements and some of them are straight out retarded and unfortunately, I cannot afford to go through all that again. Oftentimes the rarer the compound and less known supplier the worse the quality too...
Not particularly keen into investigating this myself, but feel free to inquire on our behalf - our most important paperwork is...
Any takers? We would need the funds for the standard plus whatever Jano comes back with cost wise for the HPLC tests. I recommend a trusted member to handle the funds plus someone would have to contact the supplier and request the standard and ship to Janoshik.
@janoshik [courtesy tag]
Relevance: answering key question on whether HPLC purity for Test C and Test E is accurate for raws with -ene impurities. GCMS data to date suggests it is not and that these impurities are not resolved from the HPLC API peak.
Definitely some inconsistent vetting going on in this GIF.I say we get some participant vetting in here for 2025.
In order to skew hplc you need to empty half a vial and refill it. In order to contaminate it you need one drop.So HPLC analysis of AAS raws and finished oils was doomed from the start? Seems to have worked out ok here.
Thanks for your offer to participate. We are up to 9 and will pick up in the New Year. Will be great question to answer. Merry Christmas Brother!I've fallen way behind on this thread and I'm outta time for the AM... @readalot wanted
Definitely some inconsistent vetting going on in this GIF.