curveball2025
New Member
He has the ability to IMMEDIATELY set an expectation that sets a standard which is far above ANYTHING which currently exists. That is my point. Anyone can be a vendor here without any requirements, but why not establish a higher level of expectation for vendors who pay for "sticky thread" exposure. If those vendors choose not to follow suit, they can still be part of the regular, non-paying, group of vendors.And that's the thing...I don't mind if he feels differently. I'm not trying to jump down his throat (internet communication sucks sometimes...errrr, all the time).
I would humbly invite him back to clarify. It's either:
- i. his ONLY acceptable outcome is "do exactly what I propose and there is nothing to discuss."
- ii. "I didn't see Millard's recent post. Now I understand and agree."
- iii. "I saw his post and disagree with you ass clowns because....." That's where I'm left hanging.
I understand they don't owe an answer. I'm not trying to badger the witness. He actually had a sorta/kinda general question I had in my brain when Narta previously suggested kicking all sponsored sources off the board (a strange suggestion given the outcome that would leave for everyone who buys here)...but I understood the "trap" that Narta was obviously alluding to (..the elephant in the room implication being there was some bowing to sources).
I don't have a problem with the question. I have a problem with a passive aggressive agenda and instant "shut down" once they are pressed on the issue.
I will say Kudos to them for stepping away and not continuing to escalate...that part is fair if that's the choice. However, if there is more to discuss, let's say it out loud...in a "moving the message forward" kinda way...and I guess maybe he's looking for an answer directly from Millard so this novella is not what they requested. To quote Dirt (without permission) - Peace.
I do not see why it is so difficult to comprehend my position, weather you agree with it or not.
As I said, you won!