Cash in the mail is the way to go. First of all you use the $19.99 priority envolope, which will provide a tracking number. Of course know your source, but it is much more secure than any W.U.. If someone is going to take your money what recourse would you have with W.U., or M.G. anyhow? I have used it multiple times ,and it is my preferred method.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
sending cash for domestics only?
- Thread starter realhugo
- Start date
19.99!!! Wtf
USPS has priority for less than 7.00 with tracking, no need to use Priority Express!!!
Use the all white envelope, not the one with blue on it!!! Damn
I add extra insurance anytime I send more than a couple hundred bucks so it ups the cost a little. Priority mail is like $7 as you said, then if your sending $500, insurance for that is $15 or so. I think it's around $25 for $1000. I don't mind spending $15-$25 extra for the peace of mind knowing I will get my $ back if the thing gets lost. The guy(s) I use know I do this so they usually throw me a free prop in there so it's a wash really. This is all hypothetical ofcourse. I don't use gear or order anything online.
Why would a source be okay with it going via a tracking number? I would think most of them wouldn't be cool with that?
sin
New Member
you don't get a tracking number as a receiver of gear so you don't know the origin of the package, not because of some worry of le tracking it or something else. Sending cash in mail, you know the destination address (which is/should be different than the origin of the shipment of gear) already so having a tracking number doesn't give you any info you wouldn't already have. other than where your cash is at until delivery.
Nice, I like that one.
CanadianGrind
New Member
A lot of company's do cash in mail specially wen your a new client my innovagen connection was cash in mail until I became a big trust worthy client now e transfer
If you do cash defiantly make it priority envelope 100%
Do your research bro PM guys on the form of brand you want an ask bout there order
If you do cash defiantly make it priority envelope 100%
Do your research bro PM guys on the form of brand you want an ask bout there order
I have become a fan of bitcoins, Wish Circle would raise my limits already. lol
bitcoin is not fully undetectable however. if a source gets popped and their account is locked up they will be able to trace every single bitcoin transaction that is sent. and as far as im concerned the only way to transfer money into bitcoin exchange is via a verified bank of some sort. so unless youre able to setup some shell corps and bank accounts just to order gear youre playing with fire so to speak. but then again le doesnt want the end user of gear. thats a slap on the wrist so to speak.
You could cloak and dagger it and move to several wallets and make it very hard to track.
CIM means you are not on camera at a store sending money WU or MG or Wal2Wal to a drug dealer.
Also, you are not paying the fees to wire the money.
You will pay the $5.95 (might have gone up to $6.30) for priority, but you get a tracker and like I said, you are not on camera mailing anything.
As far as a crooked postal worker snagging it, I and many others here have been doing it for years with no issues whatsoever.
As far as a source ripping you off because there's no electronic proof that you sent it - come on, seriously? If a source wanted to screw you, they'd keep your money whether it came CIM or they picked it up from WU.
Also, you are not paying the fees to wire the money.
You will pay the $5.95 (might have gone up to $6.30) for priority, but you get a tracker and like I said, you are not on camera mailing anything.
As far as a crooked postal worker snagging it, I and many others here have been doing it for years with no issues whatsoever.
As far as a source ripping you off because there's no electronic proof that you sent it - come on, seriously? If a source wanted to screw you, they'd keep your money whether it came CIM or they picked it up from WU.
A buddy of mine buys trees this way from cali and they do cash in mail well one of his payments was intercepted because the dogs hit on the money they wound up calling the person who sent the money and tried making a big thing out of it but nothing ever happened and they were able to get the money back, so it could possibly still cause some problems using this method
New study: Up to 90 percent of U.S. paper money contains traces of cocaine
WASHINGTON, Aug. 16, 2009 — You probably have cocaine in your wallet, purse, or pocket. Sound unlikely or outrageous? Think again! In what researchers describe as the largest, most comprehensive analysis to date of cocaine contamination in banknotes, scientists are reporting that cocaine is present in up to 90 percent of paper money in the United States, particularly in large cities such as Baltimore, Boston, and Detroit. The scientists found traces of cocaine in 95 percent of the banknotes analyzed from Washington, D.C., alone.
Presented here today at the 238th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, the new study suggests that cocaine abuse is still widespread and may be on the rise in some areas. It could help raise public awareness about cocaine use and lead to greater emphasis on curbing its abuse, the researchers say.
The scientists tested banknotes from more than 30 cities in five countries, including the U.S., Canada, Brazil, China, and Japan, and found “alarming” evidence of cocaine use in many areas. The U.S. and Canada had the highest levels, with an average contamination rate of between 85 and 90 percent, while China and Japan had the lowest, between 12 and 20 percent contamination. The study is the first report about cocaine contamination in Chinese and Japanese currencies, they say.
“To my surprise, we’re finding more and more cocaine in banknotes,” said study leader Yuegang Zuo, Ph.D., of the University of Massachusetts in Dartmouth.
Zuo says that the high percentage of contaminated U.S. currency observed in the current study represents nearly a 20 percent jump in comparison to a similar study he conducted two years ago. That earlier study indicated that 67 percent of bills in the U.S. contained traces of cocaine.
“I’m not sure why we’ve seen this apparent increase, but it could be related to the economic downturn, with stressed people turning to cocaine,” Zuo says. Such studies are useful, he noted, because the data can help law enforcement agencies and forensic specialists identify patterns of drug use in a community.
Scientists have known for years that paper money can become contaminated with cocaine during drug deals and directly through drug use such as snorting cocaine through rolled bills. Contamination can spread to banknotes not involved in the illicit drug culture because bills are processed in banks’ currency-counting machines.
Previous studies on cocaine in banknotes, however, had several drawbacks. They often were based on sampling only a small number of banknotes, for instance. Some tests destroyed the currency.
In the new study, Zuo and colleagues describe use of a modified form of a standard laboratory instrument termed a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer. It allows a faster, simpler and more accurate measurement of cocaine contamination than other methods, without destroying the currency. The researchers used the method to analyze banknotes of several different denominations from the five countries surveyed.
The U.S. had the highest levels. The scientists analyzed a total of 234 banknotes from the U.S. and found that up to 90 percent of the banknotes contain traces of cocaine. Amounts ranged from .006 micrograms (several thousands of times smaller than a single grain of sand) to over 1,240 micrograms of cocaine per banknote (about 50 grains of sand). For comparison: A grain of sand weighs approximately 23 micrograms; there are one million micrograms in a gram and 28 grams in an ounce.
The scientists collected U.S. banknotes from 17 U.S. cities and found that larger cities like Baltimore, Boston, and Detroit had among the highest average cocaine levels. Washington, D.C., ranked above the average, with 95 percent of the banknotes sampled contaminated with the drug. The lowest average cocaine levels in U.S. currency appeared in bills collected from Salt Lake City.
The researchers studied 27 banknotes from Canada and found that 85 percent were contaminated with cocaine, with amounts ranging from 2.4 micrograms to over 2,530 micrograms of coke per banknote. The researchers analyzed 10 banknotes from Brazil and found that 80 percent were contaminated with cocaine, still high but lower than the U.S. and Canada.
China and Japan had the lowest levels. The researchers analyzed 112 banknotes from China and found that about 20 percent were contaminated with cocaine. Of the 16 banknotes analyzed from Japan, only about 12 percent were contaminated with cocaine, the researchers say.
Despite the high percentage of cocaine-contaminated banknotes, Zuo points out that the amount of cocaine found on most notes was so small that consumers should not have any health or legal concerns about handling paper money.
“For the most part, you can’t get high by sniffing a regular banknote, unless it was used directly in drug uptake or during a drug exchange,” Zuo said. “It also won’t affect your health and is unlikely interfere with blood and urine tests used for drug detection.” This study was partly funded by the University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth.
Smokey McPot
New Member
Priority Mail is the way to go brother. It's much safer and you get a tracking numberI use priority envelope, bday and holiday cards get snatched by postal carriers
Smokey McPot
New Member
Another very safe way is if you wrap your money in a piece of paper and then put it in the envelope. You can't see the money through the envelope which makes it much safer
kinetixtrainer
New Member
I like this idea. Being on cam or being flagged by wiring funds to certain destination is something I wish to avoid. But sending cash doesn't seem to be an option any potential sources are willing to do.
Well it does open more risk to the source, as the LE could stake out the drop spot, so I can understand why UGL's would not be cool with it.
Similar threads
