Sigma Audley Inc. - Your source for peptides, ancillaries, AAS, and more!

[The Answ3r]

It’s been a week now on SSA 24iu HGH. Maybe it’s still early, but so far I haven’t noticed much difference from the others. No negative reactions, sleep’s still great, no water bloat. We keep pinning and see where it goes. If I had to rank everything I’ve tried so far, it would go something like this: 1. Lobster, 2. Opti/SSA, and 3. Q. Just my completely unscientific, highly subjective bro ranking.

 

[dinfar1337]

It’s been a week now on SSA 24iu HGH. Maybe it’s still early, but so far I haven’t noticed much difference from the others. No negative reactions, sleep’s still great, no water bloat. We keep pinning and see where it goes. If I had to rank everything I’ve tried so far, it would go something like this: 1. Lobster, 2. Opti/SSA, and 3. Q. Just my completely unscientific, highly subjective bro ranking.

i have 10 years worth of ssa hgh at 8iu.

should tell you all you should know. its good enough to be ran for 10 years, for the price aswell? lobster and opti can go kick it they can

 

[The Answ3r]

i have 10 years worth of ssa hgh at 8iu.

Bombaclat… this is money rich millionaire. Ten years of SSA HGH at 8iu a day? That’s 29,200iu total. Bro’s not holding a stash, he’s guarding the Fort Knox of growth hormone.

 

[roofer22]

i have 10 years worth of ssa hgh at 8iu.

should tell you all you should know. its good enough to be ran for 10 years, for the price aswell? lobster and opti can go kick it they can

I thought I was doing good with a six month supply. Rookie numbers

 

[HKOX]

Just sent over my list (tablets and oils) and got 'no stock' back as a response. Do they not mark items that are out of stock as such on their price list?

EDIT: nm, I see some of the items are struck through on the left side (and over right where the reports are)

 

[Mariafitness]

theres no graphite in hgh.

theres no graphene in covid vaccines either.

it was part of some fake news in 2022 tho.

Nope. over 10 countries have found it in analyzes, its graphene that clots the blood and leads to stroke, wich is why every shot is now banned for at least one age group (most common is for young boys)

 

[dinfar1337]

Nope. over 10 countries have found it in analyzes, its graphene that clots the blood and leads to stroke, wich is why every shot is now banned for at least one age group (most common is for young boys)

thanks, link me anything that could even slightly suggest theres any graphene in our hgh.

i think you're severely drunk

 

[touringsedan]

If you have any recommended new products or specifications, please let us know and we will carry out research and development and production

α-Klotho (Alpha Klotho)
FOX04-DRI (I believe you said you are already working on this)

 

[touringsedan]

If you have any recommended new products or specifications, please let us know and we will carry out research and development and production

• Name: Bimagrumab (BYM338)
• Type: Human monoclonal antibody targeting activin type II receptors (ACVR2A/B)
• Administration Route: Intravenous, long half-life for monthly dosing
• CAS Number: 1356922-05-08

 

[dinfar1337]

If you have any recommended new products or specifications, please let us know and we will carry out research and development and production

just fucking get us steroids instead of a million cancer inducing peptide thanks!

 

[Photon]

• Name: Bimagrumab (BYM338)
• Type: Human monoclonal antibody targeting activin type II receptors (ACVR2A/B)
• Administration Route: Intravenous, long half-life for monthly dosing
• CAS Number: 1356922-05-08

yea you dont want to use this from any ugl.
thankfully, you wont ever see it either.

 

[CarvinDC125]

That’s odd. That’s exactly how I do it. And Cashapp just raised my transfer limits for btc to crazy high amounts. Like 100K/week.

They are closing accounts too! They closed mine due to frequent transfers to my exodus. They said it looked suspicious so they closed my account.
I just don’t understand like are we only supposed to transfer funds like once a year or something? For the record it was three transfers since May 2024! And that was considered suspicious

 

[CarvinDC125]

just fucking get us steroids instead of a million cancer inducing peptide thanks!

Dude, I love they have HGH and GLP-1s so cheap. What’s your problem?

 

[CarvinDC125]

will say, after about 5 clear vials of the 36iu gh, I just reconstituted one with the noted "floaters" / fiber looking things. Does seem to be a very common occurrence..

I got 2 vials like that so far from my 24iu kit.
Not cloudy and barely noticeable but a few floaters In a couple vials I got 5 vials left in this kit.
I did not toss the vials with floaters. I used them and did not filter either. So far haven’t ran into any injection site reactions but I still have my concerns and will likely start filtering on kits moving forward.
I will say this did not used to be an issue. I’ve used their GH for a year now and only recently with the last two kits I’ve had have I started noticing 2-3 vials per kit having floaters

 

[CarvinDC125]

So the two types of aggregation that can occur are "growth", where peptides bump into each other and adhere into a "snowball" kind of structure, growing larger over time.

The other type of aggregation is spontaneous, where certain conditions will cause a certain size and shape to form almost immediately. with no intermediate "growth".

The latter is what I think the strings are, and most commonly the result of the PH being too acidic or base.

What may happen is the PH changes a little as the solution sits, just enough for the conditions to no longer support the spontaneous large string aggregates and they fall apart, "disaggregate" back into solution. On the other hand, the change in PH may just result in smaller, sub visible aggregates, not breaking the strings down back into rHGH monomers.

Ideal PH would prevent aggregation almost entirely.

You can see the impact of PH on types of aggregates formation here using GLP-1 as an example peptide (cloudy particles vs strings):

View attachment 340227

And the impact on rHGH. The researchers were able to reproduce conditions creating "strings" by adjusting PH:

View attachment 340225

When this happens in GH and you see those tiny amount of floaters that look like just a few tiny specs or maybe one or so of the little strings does that mean there is less GH now in that vial? For instance your 24iu vial may only have 18ius worth of GH active? IE the more floaters you see the less GH in the vial that will be effective? I’m trying to understand how the floaters affect the amount of GH in the vial.

 

[BP_6]

• Name: Bimagrumab (BYM338)
• Type: Human monoclonal antibody targeting activin type II receptors (ACVR2A/B)
• Administration Route: Intravenous, long half-life for monthly dosing
• CAS Number: 1356922-05-08

Look at the Administration Route. This is not a product an average steroid user would be doing. These are usually done in a outpatient clinic hooked up to an iv.

 

[CarvinDC125]

thanks, link me anything that could even slightly suggest theres any graphene in our hgh.

i think you're severely drunk

So is he saying some labs have found Graphene in SSA’s HGH?
That makes no sense.
One dude here just posted he been using SSA HGH for years. He would been dead by now lol…Jokes aside though I highly doubt it’s in HGH from ssa as popular as GH is you would see a lot more people having sides if it did contain it

 

[Ghoul]

When this happens in GH and you see those tiny amount of floaters that look like just a few tiny specs or maybe one or so of the little strings does that mean there is less GH now in that vial? For instance your 24iu vial may only have 18ius worth of GH active? IE the more floaters you see the less GH in the vial that will be effective? I’m trying to understand how the floaters affect the amount of GH in the vial.

Aggregated rHGH isn't active, so however much forms into aggregates is wasted. That's not the major concern with aggregates, but at the least, it reduces the amount that's functional.

It could be less than 1%, or, in the worst case scenario I've seen via experiments intentionally degrading rHGH 35% was lost to aggregation. (and that was completely invisible).

How much is impossible to say. without advanced testing. Visible aggregation has always been a thing with rHGH, but you've never seen a Jano result that said "Formed visible particulates", or even a patten of bad test results associated with rHGH batches known to have this problem.

That's because insoluble aggregates are filtered out prior to testing. So if a significant chunk of rHGH aggregates, say 5%, that will come out of the volume, not the purity. Since most vials are overdosed and we're used to variation, a 5% loss in volume, ie 4mg (12iu) vs 4.2mg (12.6iu) in a vial sold as 10iu won't be noticeable, as opposed to 91% purity vs 96% purity.

What's really funny is you'll hear people say Xyz "Cockroach" brand is "Superior" because they injected 10iu and don't get any sides, while 10iu of "XQC" brand is inferior because 10iu gives them carpal and water retention.

Guess what? Carpal and water retention are exactly what high levels of growth hormone are supposed to do. That's perfectly normal in medical treatment. It's mentioned on every box of pharma rHGH.

It's not impurities causing carpal. It's a sign the one NOT causing carpal at the same dose is less active, and aggregation reducing potency is the most likely reason.

 

[CarvinDC125]

Aggregated rHGH isn't active, so however much forms into aggregates is wasted. That's not the major concern with aggregates, but at the least, it reduces the amount that's functional.

It could be less than 1%, or, in the worst case scenario I've seen via experiments intentionally degrading rHGH 35% was lost to aggregation. (and that was completely invisible).

How much is impossible to say. without advanced testing. Visible aggregation has always been a thing with rHGH, but you've never seen a Jano result that said "Formed visible particulates", or even a patten of bad test results associated with rHGH batches known to have this problem.

That's because insoluble aggregates are filtered out prior to testing. So if a significant chunk of rHGH aggregates, say 5%, that will come out of the volume, not the purity. Since most vials are overdosed and we're used to variation, a 5% loss in volume, ie 4mg (12iu) vs 4.2mg (12.6iu) in a vial sold as 10iu won't be noticeable, as opposed to 91% purity vs 96% purity.

What's really funny is you'll hear people say Xyz "Cockroach" brand is "Superior" because they injected 10iu and don't get any sides, while 10iu of "XQC" brand is inferior because 10iu gives them carpal and water retention.

Guess what? Carpal and water retention are exactly what high levels of growth hormone are supposed to do. That's perfectly normal in medical treatment. It's mentioned on every box of pharma rHGH.

It's not impurities causing carpal. It's a sign the one NOT causing carpal at the same dose is less active, and aggregation reducing potency is the most likely reason.

Wow!
Thank you so much for the explanation. That is really interesting.
I never thought of it that way in terms of testing.
I’m going to look into this a little further. Sounds like a very interesting rabbit hole lol

 

[bigdaddyandfriends]

Aggregated rHGH isn't active, so however much forms into aggregates is wasted. That's not the major concern with aggregates, but at the least, it reduces the amount that's functional.

It could be less than 1%, or, in the worst case scenario I've seen via experiments intentionally degrading rHGH 35% was lost to aggregation. (and that was completely invisible).

How much is impossible to say. without advanced testing. Visible aggregation has always been a thing with rHGH, but you've never seen a Jano result that said "Formed visible particulates", or even a patten of bad test results associated with rHGH batches known to have this problem.

That's because insoluble aggregates are filtered out prior to testing. So if a significant chunk of rHGH aggregates, say 5%, that will come out of the volume, not the purity. Since most vials are overdosed and we're used to variation, a 5% loss in volume, ie 4mg (12iu) vs 4.2mg (12.6iu) in a vial sold as 10iu won't be noticeable, as opposed to 91% purity vs 96% purity.

What's really funny is you'll hear people say Xyz "Cockroach" brand is "Superior" because they injected 10iu and don't get any sides, while 10iu of "XQC" brand is inferior because 10iu gives them carpal and water retention.

Guess what? Carpal and water retention are exactly what high levels of growth hormone are supposed to do. That's perfectly normal in medical treatment. It's mentioned on every box of pharma rHGH.

It's not impurities causing carpal. It's a sign the one NOT causing carpal at the same dose is less active, and aggregation reducing potency is the most likely reason.

Recently I've been determining my dosing of GH by how much I can take without getting disruptive carpal tunnel syndrome. If I don't get any tingling, I increase the dose. If I cannot type or hold the steering wheel without going nuts, I decrease it. Target dose is the one that gets me a few brief tingles about 3 hrs after the dose. In me at least, any water retention seems to preferentially affect nerve sheaths, and the median nerve is the most sensitive as it courses through a physically restricted space.

That target dose does depends on the brand. When I was using meditrope (not sure if it is still available) that was 4iu/day. Bought some K4L and it was quite a bit higher... and rarely mixed clear despite careful reconstitution. I'm now using SSA and Opti Gold Top kits which I can take 7-8iu/day. Some of that is no doubt my tolerance increasing over time. But I have a feeling if I shot 8iu of Meditrope I'd have some problems... think I still have a couple kits in my pep refrigerator so maybe I'll go back to it when I finish the current kit.